people in here talking about the lack of moves and how **instert current player** would've beasted, need to put things into context.
if you put LeBron in the '60s, you'd have to strip him of most of his moves, simply because they hadn't been invented yet.
its like when bill Russell said that he never saw a blocked shot until he blocked one. people need to think about these things before they look down on older entities for not being as advanced. in reality, the Oscars, russells, wilts, etc were THEE advanced chit back then. once you acquire an understanding of this, then go back and watch the footage or more than likely - the highlights, you'll understand the amazement.
so yea, I was never shocked whenever I heard an oldhead say that Oscar was a better guard than Jordan, or if they leave Jordan out of their goat list.
i'll say this tho. the only gripe I have is that the game was still type-segregated back then. should've been a lot more niccas in the league than there were.
So had not even invented blocks back then?

The first crossover probably had them like


So with that logic can we say that a 100 years from now when their playing with bionic parts and they will look at the game we plan now and consider it inferior?
