1. what proof?? either youre cognizant of it or youre not.
2. youre right. I apologize for that. its still besides the point tho.
sidenote: 3 big hits is a huge feat in itself. the fact that their names are still brought up way more than people with numerous successful albums, says something. but again, this is all besides the point.
3. outkast was ALWAYS safe music for people that didn't really like hip-hop. some of yall just didn't catch onto it until later when they got bigger & more blatant with it. but that's on yall if yall cant keep up.
the difference between outkast and groups like pm dawn/arrested development is that outkast also developed a substantial hip-hop base. I don't know why yall keep acting like I'm grouping them in with those groups, because I'm clearly not. i wouldnt even be surprised if theyre not influenced by them either. I'm just saying they drew from their consumer base. AND THATS ALL IM SAYING.
1. Nah, bruh, you don't make a claim and skate by talking about "you had to be cognizant". Prove it. Plain and simple.
2. It's not beside the point. If you had one album that was huge and made other albums that were flops, and you're not even acknowledged after the fact (considering how huge the debut was), they are pretty much culturally irrelevant. 3 big hits is not a huge feat. There's a lot of groups/artists who had three hits and then nothing. When PM Dawn is brought up it is in relation to them not really being Hip Hop or in relation to what KRS did to one of the members.
3. Kast was not ALWAYS safe music, which goes back to the content they had in their music from day one. They have multiple songs on every album that are first person narratives of violence, misogyny, drug dealing, smoking weed, etc. Not to mention, it was profanity laced. It wasn't safe. I don't think Arrested Development had profanity in their music. Same goes for PM Dawn.
What point are you trying to make in stating they drew from their consumer base?




