Prince Akeem
Its not that deep breh....
Where do you get "performance problems" and "inadequate dev tools" from?
If Drive Club and Killzone ship this fall with those same "issues" then you have a argument.
PS4 Versus Xbox One: Resolutions and Frame Rates
- Thread starter FBGPlank
- Start date
Where do you get "performance problems" and "inadequate dev tools" from?
If Drive Club and Killzone ship this fall with those same "issues" then you have a argument.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,430
- Reputation
- -10,667
- Daps
- 22,257
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
You really walked into that one
The Xbox 360 on paper >>> PS3. Then sony "claimed" the cell would be able to do all these things it ended up NOT doing.
The GPU and RAM solution is better than PS3 on paper just like how the PS4 GPU and RAM solution is better then xb1 on paper. Basically sony was like "The ps3 has secret sauce tho" and fans of sony ran with it and never looked back. The reason sony had some incredible looking games is not because of the PS3, but because of talented studios who spent over 100million dollars creating Killzone, Uncharted/etc. Just like a movie, the bigger budgets stuff looks better. You think Grand Theft Auto 5 is gonna look Shabby on either system? The Budget is the reason. Microsoft is known for NOT spending much. Halo 4 was the first time they spent over 100mil on a game. None of this has anything to do with what a console can do on paper tho, and by the way you have been carrying on. You now appear as a guy who doesn't understand how this stuff works. No need to hurl a hateful insult in reply. Just admit you was wrong
"Rumors" have been rampart about it going both ways, but you probably couldn't find a single reliable link showing that. So all we can go off of is E3, because if PS4 games were easier to make/etc. Then we'd of seen that. What we seen is the Xbox One games seem to be much farther along than PS4 games. SuperDae spoke on this way back when and said he seen both but that he liked Xbox One games BETTER. And that people are in for a rude awakening if they think the Xbox One is weaker than the PS4. He's the guy who leaked everything. So my honest opinion is I think the Xbox One is much more powerful than they are leading on so they can have the advantage all gen long. Sony has made it clear thats what they want, Microsoft has made it clear there specs even finalized to make comparisons yet. All I know is sony added 4gb of RAM for unknown reasons. It has to be Xbox related...
You really walked into that one
The Xbox 360 on paper >>> PS3. Then sony "claimed" the cell would be able to do all these things it ended up NOT doing.
The GPU and RAM solution is better than PS3 on paper just like how the PS4 GPU and RAM solution is better then xb1 on paper. Basically sony was like "The ps3 has secret sauce tho" and fans of sony ran with it and never looked back. The reason sony had some incredible looking games is not because of the PS3, but because of talented studios who spent over 100million dollars creating Killzone, Uncharted/etc. Just like a movie, the bigger budgets stuff looks better. You think Grand Theft Auto 5 is gonna look Shabby on either system? The Budget is the reason. Microsoft is known for NOT spending much. Halo 4 was the first time they spent over 100mil on a game. None of this has anything to do with what a console can do on paper tho, and by the way you have been carrying on. You now appear as a guy who doesn't understand how this stuff works. No need to hurl a hateful insult in reply. Just admit you was wrong
"Rumors" have been rampart about it going both ways, but you probably couldn't find a single reliable link showing that. So all we can go off of is E3, because if PS4 games were easier to make/etc. Then we'd of seen that. What we seen is the Xbox One games seem to be much farther along than PS4 games. SuperDae spoke on this way back when and said he seen both but that he liked Xbox One games BETTER. And that people are in for a rude awakening if they think the Xbox One is weaker than the PS4. He's the guy who leaked everything. So my honest opinion is I think the Xbox One is much more powerful than they are leading on so they can have the advantage all gen long. Sony has made it clear thats what they want, Microsoft has made it clear there specs even finalized to make comparisons yet. All I know is sony added 4gb of RAM for unknown reasons. It has to be Xbox related...
nikka, STFU!!!!!!! Nobody trying to read your long ass garbage posts.
You really walked into that one
The Xbox 360 on paper >>> PS3. Then sony "claimed" the cell would be able to do all these things it ended up NOT doing.
The GPU and RAM solution is better than PS3 on paper just like how the PS4 GPU and RAM solution is better then xb1 on paper. Basically sony was like "The ps3 has secret sauce tho" and fans of sony ran with it and never looked back. The reason sony had some incredible looking games is not because of the PS3, but because of talented studios who spent over 100million dollars creating Killzone, Uncharted/etc. Just like a movie, the bigger budgets stuff looks better. You think Grand Theft Auto 5 is gonna look Shabby on either system? The Budget is the reason. Microsoft is known for NOT spending much. Halo 4 was the first time they spent over 100mil on a game. None of this has anything to do with what a console can do on paper tho, and by the way you have been carrying on. You now appear as a guy who doesn't understand how this stuff works. No need to hurl a hateful insult in reply. Just admit you was wrong
"Rumors" have been rampart about it going both ways, but you probably couldn't find a single reliable link showing that. So all we can go off of is E3, because if PS4 games were easier to make/etc. Then we'd of seen that. What we seen is the Xbox One games seem to be much farther along than PS4 games. SuperDae spoke on this way back when and said he seen both but that he liked Xbox One games BETTER. And that people are in for a rude awakening if they think the Xbox One is weaker than the PS4. He's the guy who leaked everything. So my honest opinion is I think the Xbox One is much more powerful than they are leading on so they can have the advantage all gen long. Sony has made it clear thats what they want, Microsoft has made it clear there specs even finalized to make comparisons yet. All I know is sony added 4gb of RAM for unknown reasons. It has to be Xbox related...
You really walked into that one
The Xbox 360 on paper >>> PS3. Then sony "claimed" the cell would be able to do all these things it ended up NOT doing.
The GPU and RAM solution is better than PS3 on paper just like how the PS4 GPU and RAM solution is better then xb1 on paper. Basically sony was like "The ps3 has secret sauce tho" and fans of sony ran with it and never looked back. The reason sony had some incredible looking games is not because of the PS3, but because of talented studios who spent over 100million dollars creating Killzone, Uncharted/etc. Just like a movie, the bigger budgets stuff looks better. You think Grand Theft Auto 5 is gonna look Shabby on either system? The Budget is the reason. Microsoft is known for NOT spending much. Halo 4 was the first time they spent over 100mil on a game. None of this has anything to do with what a console can do on paper tho, and by the way you have been carrying on. You now appear as a guy who doesn't understand how this stuff works. No need to hurl a hateful insult in reply. Just admit you was wrong
"Rumors" have been rampart about it going both ways, but you probably couldn't find a single reliable link showing that. So all we can go off of is E3, because if PS4 games were easier to make/etc. Then we'd of seen that. What we seen is the Xbox One games seem to be much farther along than PS4 games. SuperDae spoke on this way back when and said he seen both but that he liked Xbox One games BETTER. And that people are in for a rude awakening if they think the Xbox One is weaker than the PS4. He's the guy who leaked everything. So my honest opinion is I think the Xbox One is much more powerful than they are leading on so they can have the advantage all gen long. Sony has made it clear thats what they want, Microsoft has made it clear there specs even finalized to make comparisons yet. All I know is sony added 4gb of RAM for unknown reasons. It has to be Xbox related...
I thought it was always known that the ps3 was more powerful, it was just a bytch to program for.
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
It is. This dude courtdog is a clown that'll say anything in hopes that people as dumb as him will believe it. 
I already knew it was more powerful
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,430
- Reputation
- -10,667
- Daps
- 22,257
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
That president was offered a CEO position and 50millon dollars to join Zynga. How would that happen if he got firedPresident leaves microsoft shortly after unveiling the console. Yea, its all good at Microsoft.
Microsoft gets mad at him, then they be like "Yo Zynga, make this piece of shyt your leader and give him Dave Chappelle money"
It being a bytch to program for is why it wasn't more powerful. And for the majority of this gen games looked and played better on Xbox. Not to mention the xbox has a better graphics card than PS3 does. Better Ram solution as well. These things made it easier to program for, easier to get better results.
I have always admitted that PS3 had a few great looking titles, but its fact they didn't look good because of "cell". Big budget titles is why. If what I just said is incorrect I hope somebody corrects me
Nah bruh, if you couldn't handle a simple paragraph then there is no way you have read up on the topics we are discussing which require a hell of a lot more reading that what I post (Story Tru)
Oh wait, am I EXPOSING!!! nikkaz again
Where do you get "performance problems" and "inadequate dev tools" from?
If Drive Club and Killzone ship this fall with those same "issues" then you have a argument.
I'm talking about right now. Obviously we have more time until launch. The performace issues should be fixed before launch. But I don't see the games magically jumping up to 60fps
ChrisDorner
Banned
60 FPS =/= graphical or gameplay quality IMO
nikkas say call of duty the GOAT cuz of the framerate but at the same time say they're tired of it
I never once played a shooter & thought "you know what this game needs? More FPS
"
60 FPS =/= graphical or gameplay quality IMO
nikkas say call of duty the GOAT cuz of the framerate but at the same time say they're tired of it
I never once played a shooter & thought "you know what this game needs? More FPS
I'd agree with you about any other genre, but shooters need to be as smooth as possible, with as little lag as possible. That's why killzone never made it to the popularity of a lot of other shooters. After playing COD at a smooth stable 60fps anything less just feels sluggish in comparison.
Jonas Mattson has provided some comments regarding the RAM advantage the PS4 supposedly has over the Xbox One. According to a report by Gameranx on June 26, the environmental artist at CD Projekt RED was asked about how the studio will make use of the faster system memory of Sony’s next-generation console in “The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.” He responded by saying that the open-world role-playing game won’t be taking “too much advantage” when developing the project on the PS4 as opposed to the Xbox One
Why hurt your sales on a multiplat game....