Remember When Napolean aka śïñe•qúå_nøn Sh!tted On Black Folks For Supporting Mike Brown.?

☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,255
Reputation
-34,066
Daps
611,790
Reppin
The Deep State
Barnett114 said:
Quoting me like I'll really going to respond :patrice:
Click to expand...
If only you all handled ACTUAL white supremacists on this forum that are crowding you out in The Coliseum or Higher Learning, we'd actually learn what the real motives were with the moderation done on here.

I've proven i'm black on this forum dozens of times. Now i've proven my clear stance on every issue placed before me.

At some point, its going to have to be stated that this is a baseless hit job.

Go after real problems. I'm not one of them.
 
C

Creflo ½ Dollar

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
4,791
Reputation
-1,716
Daps
16,112
Reppin
GA
∆y = f(∆x) said:
The real problem is that I have to keep answering this.

I maintain that:

  1. This was before Philando Castile (a case I thought would really change things). IMO, this was the case that people should have gone crazy over and turned Minneapolis/St. Paul into what happened in Baltimore with Freddie Gray.
  2. Darren Wilson was looking for confrontation. It doesn't seem to me that Darren Wilson approached Mike Brown in good faith
  3. There was never enough evidence to prosecute Darren Wilson
  4. Wilson was over-charged: Amid Conflicting Accounts, Trusting Darren Wilson
  5. Mike Brown's case was the wrong hill for us to die on. Too much happened and its not clear what took place to a reliable degree. This bothers people and it ignores the reality of the situation.
  6. It looked like there was a fight/scuffle/altercation with Darren Wilson. You can't fight Darren Wilson. Period.That deflates any sort of defense necessary to charge Wilson with a crime and it takes away the leverage you need with white jurors.
  7. I knew SOMETHING happened with Mike Brown's case of having his hands up because of the sheer preponderance of witness accounts, but there was not enough to do with it
  8. The video of Mike Brown in the convenient store before the murder hurts the argument that he didnt get into an altercation with Darren Wilson in the court of public opinion. This is just what happens. You know this is true.You can't fix that on a societal level of how things are viewed.
  9. This interpretation of the video changes things: Stranger Fruit (film) - Wikipedia that Mike Brown wasn't in the wrong at the convenient store...or less in the wrong. Either way, it may not really change much if Darren Wilson didn't know what happened when he rolled up on Mike Brown
  10. Ultimately in the court of public opinion, its impossible to account for enough leverage to successfully win enough support to defend Mike Brown's case. Its a perfect storm of bad options. Its not Walter Scott. Its not Philando Castile. Its not Trayvon Martin. Its not Tamir Rice. Its not Renisha McBride. Its not Eric Garner. Why people died on the Mike Brown hill, I maintain was a missed opportunity for the community and it hurt our ability to successfully navigate public opinion towards changing the outcomes in police brutality and assault. It got co-opted by people who didn't know what they were doing, who didn't know what they were talking about, and didn't know how to use it to our advantage to push for change. As more information came out, it was harder and harder defend and no one wanted to back down because of the newfound publicity of guys like Deray and Netta etc.
  11. If we understand that the Civil Rights Era of the 60s, we understand that they PICKED AND CHOSE which cases to take up as activist projects. Strategy mattered. Pretending that it didn't influence decision making is a fatal error.

And whats worse? i've said this ad nauseam and no one updates the fact that i've addressed this.

At this point, its harassment at the highest levels.

I'm TIRED of answering this.

I have repeated this DOZENS of times.
Click to expand...


Well a lot of posters are going to bash you and but that response actually make sense.

The Coli can do their own research to prove different but I haven’t seen nobody provide any facts to shyt on your argument most people just reacting emotionally but facts and evidence prove exactly what you was saying.

But regardless if we as black people chose another argument to fight on Cacs still dnt care. Cacs dnt care about facts as you can see for example the Kap situation and Trumps whole presidency.
 
Billy Ocean

Billy Ocean

Divine Universal Black Man Representin'
Supporter
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
42,779
Reputation
9,309
Daps
207,637
Reppin
TPC
∆y = f(∆x) said:
The real problem is that I have to keep answering this.

I maintain that:

  1. This was before Philando Castile (a case I thought would really change things). IMO, this was the case that people should have gone crazy over and turned Minneapolis/St. Paul into what happened in Baltimore with Freddie Gray.
  2. Darren Wilson was looking for confrontation. It doesn't seem to me that Darren Wilson approached Mike Brown in good faith
  3. There was never enough evidence to prosecute Darren Wilson
  4. Wilson was over-charged: Amid Conflicting Accounts, Trusting Darren Wilson
  5. Mike Brown's case was the wrong hill for us to die on. Too much happened and its not clear what took place to a reliable degree. This bothers people and it ignores the reality of the situation.
  6. It looked like there was a fight/scuffle/altercation with Darren Wilson. You can't fight Darren Wilson. Period.That deflates any sort of defense necessary to charge Wilson with a crime and it takes away the leverage you need with white jurors.
  7. I knew SOMETHING happened with Mike Brown's case of having his hands up because of the sheer preponderance of witness accounts, but there was not enough to do with it
  8. The video of Mike Brown in the convenient store before the murder hurts the argument that he didnt get into an altercation with Darren Wilson in the court of public opinion. This is just what happens. You know this is true.You can't fix that on a societal level of how things are viewed.
  9. This interpretation of the video changes things: Stranger Fruit (film) - Wikipedia that Mike Brown wasn't in the wrong at the convenient store...or less in the wrong. Either way, it may not really change much if Darren Wilson didn't know what happened when he rolled up on Mike Brown
  10. Ultimately in the court of public opinion, its impossible to account for enough leverage to successfully win enough support to defend Mike Brown's case. Its a perfect storm of bad options. Its not Walter Scott. Its not Philando Castile. Its not Trayvon Martin. Its not Tamir Rice. Its not Renisha McBride. Its not Eric Garner. Why people died on the Mike Brown hill, I maintain was a missed opportunity for the community and it hurt our ability to successfully navigate public opinion towards changing the outcomes in police brutality and assault. It got co-opted by people who didn't know what they were doing, who didn't know what they were talking about, and didn't know how to use it to our advantage to push for change. As more information came out, it was harder and harder defend and no one wanted to back down because of the newfound publicity of guys like Deray and Netta etc.
  11. If we understand that the Civil Rights Era of the 60s, we understand that they PICKED AND CHOSE which cases to take up as activist projects. Strategy mattered. Pretending that it didn't influence decision making is a fatal error.

And whats worse? i've said this ad nauseam and no one updates the fact that i've addressed this.

At this point, its harassment at the highest levels.

I'm TIRED of answering this.

I have repeated this DOZENS of times.
Click to expand...


Good job, ya'll. Keep ya'll foot on this bytch ass Indian's neck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top