Ruth Bader Ginsburg died

Worthless Loser

Blackpilled
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
17,822
Reputation
5,629
Daps
119,138
6-3 Conservative majority in Supreme Court means:

-Good chance ACA/Obamacare is ruled unconstitutional. (Trump is currently at the Supreme Court trying to strike it down)
-Roe vs Wade is gone, anti-abortion laws passed by states allowed to go through.
-More voter suppression tactics (As a 5-4 Conservative majority, the Supreme Court ruled to gut the voting rights act during Obama's term.)
-Less chance Qualified Immunity is taken as a case before the court.
-Workers Rights? Yeah right. They already screwed people on that just 2 years ago.

Trump re-elected with a 6-3 Majority
-Getting away with another type of Muslim ban (even though it took them three revisions) this time directed toward whoever he wants. Could be toward Mexico. Or could be toward the African "shyt hole" countries he hates so much.
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,437
Daps
152,934
Reppin
NULL
So, we going to act like black people didn't vote to allow this woman to have 8 fukking years to step down?

Black people gave her 8 fukking years to step down and she didn't.

Stop blaming Black people for what happened today.

She had plenty of time to step down and didn't.

Tell Democrats to stop putting older MFers in the Supreme Court in the first place.

I find it funny that people are quick to blame Black people for everything that happens in the country. :mjpls:
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,251
Reputation
2,761
Daps
76,325
Reppin
NULL
Because all these old ass career politicians are from an era where Republicans were some what on the same page as them and agreeable to most common sense issues. Democrats really think the system is working as it should, they still think Republicans will come around like they did with Nixon.


When trump made that comment about running for a third term, I saw people defending the shyt. They claimed that he meant Trump Jr would run after his second term, then they were entertaining the idea of trumps daughter winning after Trump Jr.

They were excited about this, this is what the Republican base is now and these old ass Democrats dont understand that they cant win playing fair anymore.

:francis:

I believe it. I think a lot of them are friends, like people in high finance roles on Wall Street or Hollywood types in entertainment. Quid pro quo, you scratch my back I‘ll scratch yours, etc. We think there’s a real dislike between them when they look at each other like peers that just have a disagreement about policy or strategy. So they’re never really going to put their foot on their throats like they should.

You clearly don’t know politics. The Dems couldn’t do jack shyt when the republican senate said no vote. The senate holds all the power. Dems pander, Republicans ignore rules and play to win. Then they got the power. And yet still folks are hesitant to vote dem. :heh:Folks gonna bang that don’t vote drum til they get enough senators to amend the constitution and then wonder what happened

First of all, chill out with your condescending bullsh*t. Every one above 12 knows the Republicans control the Senate. I lived in DC for 80 percent of Obama’s two terms. I was literally there. The point is the bolded.
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,437
Daps
152,934
Reppin
NULL
I believe it. I think a lot of them are friends, like people in high finance roles on Wall Street or Hollywood types in entertainment. Quid pro quo, you scratch my back I‘ll scratch yours, etc. We think there’s a real dislike between them when they look at each other like peers that just have a disagreement about policy or strategy. So they’re never really going to put their foot on their throats like they should.



First of all, chill out with your condescending bullsh*t. Every one above 12 knows the Republicans control the Senate. I lived in DC for 80 percent of Obama’s two terms. I was literally there. The point is the bolded.

shyt, Ginsburg and racist ass Scalia were friends.
 

Captain Crunch

Veteran
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
44,709
Reputation
2,560
Daps
113,569
Reppin
NY
I don't think you understand anything about the US political system.
The local courts under Democratic control have advanced civil rights - all other have worked against.

Biden will nominate Kagan-like judges at worst.

Ok what civil right laws have local courts advanced, and how have they benefitted us? Give me specific examples of laws they advanced, that specifically benefit us?

Are you actually this fukking stupid?

FOH w/ the name calling, either you can answer these questions below or get TF on :camby:

How has the courts(local or SC) advocated on our behalf in the past 12 years?

Given that Biden is a ws and was molded by the lines of Strom Thurmond, do you honestly believe he'll select judges that will fight for black people's interests?
 

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
42,849
Reputation
6,093
Daps
168,508
Reppin
Dallas, TX
I mean I already knew that. I;m just saying that given how things have been going (yale lawsuit etc.) there's a very good chance that affirmative action won't exist in 5 years. Trump might accelerate that timeline.
If he gets rid of affirmative action then it's white women who'll suffer the most since they've been the main benefactors of it.
 

Malik1time

What you looking at?
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
25,424
Reputation
5,276
Daps
98,186
Reppin
Queens
Can someone explain to me how is helps trump?
If he lose won’t it mean nothing who he appoints?
 

TRY GOD

BOTH SIDES.
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,626
Reputation
3,270
Daps
76,467
Reppin
GOD

TallMan_J

Retired from TheColi
Bushed
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
8,703
Reputation
1,301
Daps
31,512
Reppin
Retired
What is your point? This isn't about her dying, I doubt people knew of her before Trump got elected. Its about her seat being open.

So the Black Community is generally too stupid and uninformed to be aware of who the people of the highest ranking court in the nation are? You typed this yourself. How did you come to this conclusion?
:ohhh:

"So what if she said some racist and suspect shyt? What's that got to do with anything?"-You

Yet, if it was Trump or a Republican that committed the violation, all hell would break loose and you wouldn't shut up about it. But it's okay if the Dems do it. You'll defend Massa until your last breath, asking us "What is your point?".
:wow:

Support who you're going to support, but you've exposed yourself as a DNC shill in plenty of other threads and you're continuing to do so in this one. Keep it up. We see you.
:ehh:

So, we going to act like black people didn't vote to allow this woman to have 8 fukking years to step down?

Black people gave her 8 fukking years to step down and she didn't.

Stop blaming Black people for what happened today.

She had plenty of time to step down and didn't.

Tell Democrats to stop putting older MFers in the Supreme Court in the first place.

I find it funny that people are quick to blame Black people for everything that happens in the country. :mjpls:

Rep. Nothing but facts, mane.
:ehh:
 
Last edited:

TRY GOD

BOTH SIDES.
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,626
Reputation
3,270
Daps
76,467
Reppin
GOD
No troll, I honestly never gave a shyt about the supreme court because they are the last defenders of white supremacy(DRED SCOTT...DRED SCOTT....DRED SCOTT), so serious answers are the only thing I care about.


Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the most senior member of the court's liberal wing, was the only justice to pen a separate opinion in the case. Ginsburg concurred with the judgment of the court, but wrote separately to note that she disagreed with Comcast's assertion that the civil rights legislation only barred discrimination in a contract's final stages.

"Thus, a lender would not violate [the law] by requiring prospective borrowers to provide one reference letter if they are white and five if they are black," Ginsburg wrote. "Nor would an employer violate [the law] by reimbursing expenses for white interviewees but requiring black applicants to pay their own way."

The court's opinion, written by Gorsuch, neither accepted nor rejected Comcast's claim on that front.

Ginsburg also wrote, in a footnote, that she disagreed with the but-for standard in discrimination cases.

"I recognize, however, that our precedent now establishes this form of causation as a 'default rul[e]' in the present context," she wrote.

Supreme Court hands win to Comcast in $20 billion racial discrimination suit





I didnt forget.[/QUOTE
 
Top