Should College Football Expand The Playoffs?

Rigby.

The #1 Rated Mixtape of all Time
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
52,107
Reputation
2,465
Daps
74,820
Reppin
JordanHareStadium
Yeah I don't like how they killed off the computers that was more fair than a bunch of old cronies playing round of golf and sitting in boardroom for an hour winging it.
All the committee has been good for is forcing 1 or 2 matchups they’ve assumed everyone wanted to see again

2014: Urban vs Saban (good call)
2015: shyt was a complete whiff, but Clemson vs Oklahoma rematch had some narratives
2016: Clemson vs OSU rematch (whiff)
2017: everyone knew we were getting Clemson vs Alabama again
2018: Clemson vs Alabama AGAIN (and of course the SEC bowl UGA vs UA that 4 people outside of the south will enjoy)

They just hit the fukk outta the X button picking Alabama or Clemson for these ratings
 

Pure Water

Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
15,319
Reputation
3,029
Daps
75,574
Yes. 8 teams. Ohio State and Penn State could have beat any of these teams that played in the playoff today. UCF just beat the team that would have eliminated Alabama if they wouldn't have lost to the other team in the championship. This whole the regular season is the playoff thing is lazy rhetoric. The truth of the matter is they didn't want to expand to 8 from the jump because they want to see how having a playoff with affect viewership of lesser bowls.

FCS ain't got these issues, Basketball ain't got these issues, lacrosse ain't got these issues, baseball ain't got these issues, DII and DIII ain't got these issues. So I really don't want to hear the bullshyt.
 

UserNameless

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
36,629
Reputation
3,390
Daps
65,971
Reppin
Everywhere...You never there.
Conference winners would also eliminate a fukking committee that doesn't even have a protocol to go by.

They picked Alabama to go and some probably decided that if they only lost one game they were going no matter what.

Playoffs shouldn't be decided by how many games a person watches. If that's the case they should've just used the old bcs algorithms or the ap/coaches poll average.

Yeah I don't like how they killed off the computers that was more fair than a bunch of old cronies playing round of golf and sitting in boardroom for an hour winging it.

Every game doesn’t matter. That’s been obvious since 2012 BCS title game and reason why ESPN even went away from the slogan. Rings true af with this flaky ass committee making selections and their criteria changing by the week

Yes. 8 teams. Ohio State and Penn State could have beat any of these teams that played in the playoff today. UCF just beat the team that would have eliminated Alabama if they wouldn't have lost to the other team in the championship. This whole the regular season is the playoff thing is lazy rhetoric. The truth of the matter is they didn't want to expand to 8 from the jump because they want to see how having a playoff with affect viewership of lesser bowls.

FCS ain't got these issues, Basketball ain't got these issues, lacrosse ain't got these issues, baseball ain't got these issues, DII and DIII ain't got these issues. So I really don't want to hear the bullshyt.

I don’t mean to beat a dead horse but Alabama dead ass didn’t beat a now top 15 team. They didn’t make the conference champ...like how do you even formulate the sentence “every season game matters” when this situation exists


#Message
 

Homeboy Runny-Ray

From Around The Way
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,724
Reputation
-959
Daps
20,142
Reppin
Classic Niccas
No

4 teams leaves very little room for error during the regular season. Additional games for the boys who ain't making no money :smh:


No, extending the playoffs takes away the "playoff" atmosphere that surrounds every game during the season. And I don't want to hear the inevitable bytching about it being too many teams when there's a down year and some 3 loss team sneaks in and wins it


no it doesn't.

the same scenarios would be at play this year if it was an 8-team playoff with just two at-large bids.

only difference is that Alabama would've knew they were a lock once auburn lost, instead of waiting another 12 hours to watch the selection show.

basically, the only losers would be ESPN with their long drawn-out selection show. but the actual games would've had the same exact implications. in fact, THEY WOULDVE MEANT MORE. plus, the pac-12 chip would've meant more, and that group of 5 schools would have something to play for. and real-rap, the AAC was the 5th best conference this year.
 
Last edited:

mr. smoke weed

Smoke Album Done......Wait n See #SmokeSquad
Resting in Peace
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,313
Reputation
3,850
Daps
52,089
Reppin
Chi
Top 8 and if you don't want the change I'm gonna say you have an agenda
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,404
Reputation
4,605
Daps
94,067
Reppin
The Diaspora
8 teams at the minimum..miss me with that "Every game matters" narrative.

Clemson lost to Syracuse and struggled with FSU and went in as #1 :stopitslime:

Bama ain't beat nobody aint make the conference championship game and got in :stopitslime:

Everyone killed Ohio State for that Iowa lost but EVERYONE in Big 10 country knows going to Kinnick Stadium at night and dealing with Kirk Ferentz is literally hell..

Wisconsin lost once in a good showing against OSU and everyone in the media treated em like they were Nevada or some shyt.

UCF just based on the eye test had the athletes and coaching to compete with anyone .
 
Last edited:

Professor K.

rap game Paul Millsap
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
8,837
Reputation
3,154
Daps
34,425
Reppin
Atlanta, GA
no it doesn't.

the same scenarios would be at play this year if it was an 8-team playoff with just two at-large bids.

only difference is that Alabama would've knew they were a lock once auburn lost, instead of waiting another 12 hours.
No, they would have known they were in before they even played that game no matter what happened. Outside of rivalry, that game wouldn't have mattered whatsoever and you could argue they might as well had rested their starters and threw that game to avoid playing another meaningless game in the SEC championship.

After their bowl performances, does anyone really think that USC and Auburn deserved a shot at the national championship? Really? People think it's a good idea on paper but it has far more potential to be terrible in execution.

And, most importantly
No

4 teams leaves very little room for error during the regular season. Additional games for the boys who ain't making no money :smh:

Would be some bullshyt
 

bnm8907

All Star
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
2,685
Reputation
575
Daps
6,021
Reppin
NULL
No, they would have known they were in before they even played that game no matter what happened. Outside of rivalry, that game wouldn't have mattered whatsoever and you could argue they might as well had rested their starters and threw that game to avoid playing another meaningless game in the SEC championship.

After their bowl performances, does anyone really think that USC and Auburn deserved a shot at the national championship? Really? People think it's a good idea on paper but it has far more potential to be terrible in execution.

And, most importantly


Would be some bullshyt



How do they do it at Div1 AA, Div 2, Div 3 etc. ?
 

Jerz-2

GOATs Status
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
15,770
Reputation
5,519
Daps
58,087
No, extending the playoffs takes away the "playoff" atmosphere that surrounds every game during the season. And I don't want to hear the inevitable bytching about it being too many teams when there's a down year and some 3 loss team sneaks in and wins it
This is true....but money wins out every time, dawggie.

They'e GOING to six teams eventually. I don't think they go to eight though, personally.
 

DropTopDoc

Smokin my Opps like Patrick Mahomes pops
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
42,039
Reputation
6,849
Daps
84,457
Reppin
South Side Chicago to Nola
Every game never counted, so let’s all relax, on the every game counts, nikkas wouldn’t be playing east west state 2-3 games out the year,if that was the case, and the stadium still be packed for them trash games. honestly if they shave off one or two out of conference games, and make an conference vs conference challenge in the early part of the year, like acc vs big ten, then a week or two later acc vs sec, with like matches, last years conference winner vs last years conference winner, and work it’s way down accordingly, that way you get a decent out of conference, you cut down on some games, and with the 4 team play offs you have some semblance of a true proven winner, granted the up top have a harder schedule, but at least it’s no doubt that a usc or osu earned their spot


Or just move it to 6, you got the top power 5 and then one exception outside the conferences power 5, or a school who was on the outside looking in
 
Top