And LeBron has been much more successful during that time, individually and teamwise.
By going 2-4 in the NBA Finals over that span?

Kobe's won the NBA Finals in 2 out 3 chances...surrounded by lesser teammates in 8 of the 13 seasons over the time span. LeBron has had 6 chances to win, but has only won 2 times...even though he was surrounded by better teammates in 8 of his 13 seasons than Kobe has been according to you.

How is that "more successful" then? Kobe's harboring a 66% success rate, LeBron a 33% success rate, but you're saying LeBron has been much more successful?

Last edited:



"5>2" isn't a crazy argument its a fact, and "Shaq" can be countered wit "Wade & Bosh"
LeBron had to go to Miami to win and Kobe won without Shaq but LeBron hasn't won without Wade & Bosh. And
@ doesn't have more rings because he's better at basketball, this is the dumbest post I ever seen on this subject.
