So What Exactly is Wrong with "Social Justice"?

[Uncle Hotep]

this is dangerous to you? a bunch of white folks standing in front of a rob e lee statue with wick torches from home depot.... you should be ashamed of ya self black man

 

[Maschine_Man]

Very few people have a problem with REAL social justice. The problem is, stuff like this is presented as "social justice" now a days:



^This is from Everyday Feminism, a massive SJ website, so you can't tell me this doesn't count. Especially if you read the comments on FB, a lot of the "warriors" support this.

yo, that women dude guy person just opened up a whole new can of worms.... that whole women with penises vs women with vaginas thing...

but gain, THIS person still gets that there are still only 2 genders.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

This is like one large Prager U advertisement

 

[acri1]

So many idiots trying to tiptoe around their misogyny and anti-LGBTQ feelings. Just own your bigotry instead of trying to intellectualize it and come up with wild conspiracy theories about how women and gay people run society and are plotting its destruction

This.

But honestly, at this point the term is used for anybody who cares about anything. Like, I've been called a SJW for caring about police brutality and climate change.

 

[Maschine_Man]

This.

But honestly, at this point the term is used for anybody who cares about anything. Like, I've been called a SJW for caring about police brutality and climate change.

The problem is those that feel that tolerance is more important then logic and understanding.
Which is why dudes like you (I'm assuming) that actually stand up for real social issues that "tolerate" and don't say anything to those virtue signalling retards that actually turn social justice in to a farce, are part of the problem.

People that truly believe in equality and fairness and justice need to stop being so tolerant of these "SJW's" that don't care in that stuff and only want the attention of looking like a progressive person.

 

[Pressure]

People that use the line diversity for diversity's sake are racist anyway. I don't really care much about the race of a fictional character. The first officer is a black woman that's cool if she was a Hispanic male that would be fine too or a white male. Everything isn't a political statement or some grand statement.

Diversity for diversity's sake? Is there another sake diversity is supposed to be for other than its own?

Is it diversity for diversity's sake or is just fair representation?

 

[Pressure]

The problem is those that feel that tolerance is more important then logic and understanding.
Which is why dudes like you (I'm assuming) that actually stand up for real social issues that "tolerate" and don't say anything to those virtue signalling retards that actually turn social justice in to a farce, are part of the problem.

People that truly believe in equality and fairness and justice need to stop being so tolerant of these "SJW's" that don't care in that stuff and only want the attention of looking like a progressive person.

Tolerance is logical and it operates around fairness and equality.

You just hate it when logic, fairness, equality goes against your emotions or instincts.

 

[ghostwriterx]

The problem is those that feel that tolerance is more important then logic and understanding.
Which is why dudes like you (I'm assuming) that actually stand up for real social issues that "tolerate" and don't say anything to those virtue signalling retards that actually turn social justice in to a farce, are part of the problem.

People that truly believe in equality and fairness and justice need to stop being so tolerant of these "SJW's" that don't care in that stuff and only want the attention of looking like a progressive person.

 

[GPBear]

I love how there's two pages of intelligently written dense paragraphs, and then @Pink_Freud 's stupid ass coming in and ranting a bunch of nonsense that ultimately boils down to "but here is the kicker, Social Justice in 2017 is NOT about real justice and equality" meanwhile not offering any concrete evidence.

You kinda just kept going on and on to fill in space around that to make yourself seem articulate because all the posts around yours are completely dismantling everything you hold dear

Get fukked

 

[Maschine_Man]

Tolerance is logical and it operates around fairness and equality.

You just hate it when logic, fairness, equality goes against your emotions or instincts.

No, see you don't understand that act of tolerance isn't the problem, it is the act of being tolerant of bad ideas and allowing them to go unchecked.

Me tolerating a mental health patient that thinks he's the King of England and that his best friends are JFK and Mr. T doesn't mean that I should accept what he is saying as logical and truth. Which is no different than what goes on in current society.

Tolerance doesn't mean that what you are tolerating is logical or makes any sense at all. All it means is that you allow it to exist without interference.

And if you can't see how this mindset is a problem then you are part of the problem.

This mindset occurs on the right just as much as it occurs on the left. Ppl will say shyt and do shyt and it will stay unchecked for fear of not appearing tolerant. Which allows this reckless thought and behavior to exist and grow.

This is the problem with group think and ppl putting more importance on group membership(and division) than on actual truth and ideas. Everyone is afraid to be outcasted from their ingroups so they allow these bad ideas and recklessness to manifest and you end up with retards like Antifa and Richard Spencer.

see above...

 

[thekingsmen]

Alot of these kats dont know the origins of SJ let alone the definition.

 

[NvrCMyNut]

Nothing wrong with social justice. The SJW movement however is rooted in eroding our basic freedoms to create a quasi police state. See: Sweden, Germany, Britain etc

 

[Maschine_Man]

I love how there's two pages of intelligently written dense paragraphs, and then @Pink_Freud 's stupid ass coming in and ranting a bunch of nonsense that ultimately boils down to "but here is the kicker, Social Justice in 2017 is NOT about real justice and equality" meanwhile not offering any concrete evidence.

You kinda just kept going on and on to fill in space around that to make yourself seem articulate because all the posts around yours are completely dismantling everything you hold dear

Get fukked

No one is dismantling shyt, and what many of you fail to realize is that consensus does NOT equal objectivity and truth. Sorry. So just because 1,000,000 white women feel that the "patriarchy" is holding them back and this mythical wage gap is unfair doesn't mean it's the truth.
Just like how 100 ppl in here may go around dappin and reppin each other up doesn't necessarily make them right.

You standing idle as you watch these Multi gendered fukking weirdos running around demanding that you call them ZIM and ZIR and all this weird shyt doesn't mean that you are a homophobe or a bigot because you disagree with them.
However, this far left thinking that tolerance is more important than science and fact and truth allows these ppl to continue on going unchecked.

when you have Uniiversity professors claiming shyt like...



And no one is checking him on it, and the ones tha DO are labelled homophobic or bigots, there is a fukking problem.

But naw, I'll let the coli lunatic brigade keep telling it.

 

[thekingsmen]

-Identity politics diluting attention to legitimate issues (catcalling vs police brutality vs transexual support vs black men are trash feminist = BLM)

-SJW being mainly frauds and most "twitter backlash" situations are just people commenting on a trending topic but not being truly invested in the issue (Flint water crisis)

-People who chime and demand things with no realistic plans or intention to execute. In otherwords SJW tend to be people who complain just to complain and don't have any intent to see through the stuff they harp on. (Privilege arguments, demand handouts that can't be reasonably made)


-As a man, I don't respect the reinforced victim mentalities of these groups. Way too much group hugs and apologists way too little fixing.

-SJW are mainly moral grandstanders and don't care nor are invested in actual politics

- SJW are only invested in things that they are triggered by or are opposed to but don't really stand for anything on their own. Or what they do stand for is nebulous concepts. "I support gay rights" "what right are you advocating for?" "........" Basically these people exist to chastise and nothing else.

- Many SJW topics are rooted in pusedoscience and bs social concepts that are good for commenting on online in one off tweets/posts but can't logically unpack. (cultural appropriation, privilege)

- Continuing the above, the reactive ADD nature of how SJW move makes controlled narratives easier. (Ferguson/BLM, NYC catcalling video, fake outrage)

-Outside of calling out discrimination, the labeling is corny. When people can't logically refute an opposing arguement the dodge it by summing it up with a label. Consider it the mainstream white american version of coli's "W-w-well you're a c00n!"

Facts.

 

[Pressure]

No, see you don't understand that act of tolerance isn't the problem, it is the act of being tolerant of bad ideas and allowing them to go unchecked.

The irony...