I shouldn't have to spell things out for a STEM acolyte but here goes; you want people to follow STEM career paths via STEM education. Most people who are engineers WANT to be engineers. Most people who are in art school/major in art are WANT to do that. STEM fields require devotion and dedication. Someone who wants to paint daisies won't make a good engineer. People who are in it ONLY for the money won't make good engineers.
So again, American companies won't be turning away Asians for subpar American engineers. Do you understand now?
Success in anything requires devotion + dedication. And like I said,
artists who study art, have a talent for art and put 100% into it generally do OK. 1/3 of my college were artists, many of them went on to do big + great things... but then again the school is hard as hell to get into.
Coming back to your point though, someone who chooses
any major because its the path of least resistance probably won't be successful at
anything. And that is how many, if not most folks who do majors like communications, art, history etc make those decisions. They are pressured to go to college, don't know what to do, pick an easy major to squeeze through and get out as painlessly as possible. Is that how you think a successful person operates?
I don't know what the STEM hate is about bruh. For a minute you were making at least as much $$$ as me doing that TSA shyt. What's the problem? We are just having a discussion here. And I want people to do what they want to do. But really
think about what they want to do and make informed decisions. Work hard etc. That may or may not be a STEM degree. But I do know in the context of global competitiveness and employability, STEM is a way surer bet,
even if its not necessarily what you want to do, than a soft major. So if it comes down to that, I think STEM is the way to go, unless you have a real passion + talent for a soft field.