Spain and Portugal are the most genetically African part of Europe

IVS

Superstar
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
12,618
Reputation
2,842
Daps
40,143
Reppin
In the sky
Look at this fukkin crakkka.

You know we have pictures of Moors from back in the day? Mostly done by Europeans. There was no confusion about what they were. They were depicted as black.

Stop thinking "negro" meant black. It was only meant to designate one type of African. Ethiopians weren't called "negro" by the Europeans. They were called Hamites. Another name for blacks. Unless you're one to believe Ethiopians aren't black, then the whole "negro" label in meaningless.

We've had many threads on the Moors on this site. Tons of pictures and quotes have been posted. To question whether they were black just shows me you a cac. PERIOD.

IDGAF. Youza sensitive lil whore. Far from a cracka mr dumbass. Im just pointing out that if the Moors were black, as were the Berbers they also participated in the slave trade.

Completing missing the fuxing point because youre a bit slow. My point was they called the entire army moorish, and yet they included all the other nations as also being part of the hordes. Could that be because the major part of the army was black though it featured some Syrian, Tatars, and Persians etc..

Okay Mr Dumbazz
 
Last edited:

IVS

Superstar
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
12,618
Reputation
2,842
Daps
40,143
Reppin
In the sky
They were black the ancient root word for moor designate black people. The reason they were muslims was the invasion of Islam during the trading period where west Africa and north Africa had to revert in order to continue trading. Islamic believers conquered the trading routes.
I know the damn root of the word. And Im not denying they were black. My point is being black dont means shyt. What were their tribal identity and who is who in that list of peoples they mentioned in the poem. I need some of y'all to demonstrate some type of damn critical thinking and not be brash simpletons...a la
@Swagnificent
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
33,633
Reputation
6,457
Daps
51,978
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
I know the damn root of the word. And Im not denying they were black. My point is being black dont means shyt. What were their tribal identity and who is who in that list of peoples they mentioned in the poem. I need some of y'all to demonstrate some type of damn critical thinking and not be brash simpletons...a la
@OhNoYouDidnt

:sas2:
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,866
Daps
84,291
Reppin
NULL
IDGAF. Youza sensitive lil whore. Far from a cracka mr dumbass. Im just pointing out that if the Moors were black, as were the Berbers they also participated in the slave trade.

Completing missing the fuxing point because youre a bit slow. My point was they called the entire army moorish, and yet they included all the other nations as also being part of the hordes. Could that be because the major part of the army was black though it featured some Syrian, Tatars, and Persians etc..

Okay Mr Dumbazz

First of all, ain't no "if" about it. The Moors were clearly black. To even question it shows me you are non-black. Cause only non-black people have a tough time believing black people's true history.

Now onto your main point: So what if they participated in the slave trade? Once again, only a non-black person thinks slavery was just limited to black folks. Just because we live under the current paradigm of white supremacy that has tried to limit slavery to the exploitation of black people when the truth is all humans were at one point enslaved somewhere in the world. Since every group was enslaved and did the enslaving, why does it matter if the Moors did?

Also if we're being accurate, the Moors enslaved way more so-called white people than they did so-called black people. I've made many a thread on this and cited countless books. Maybe its time your non-black ass got educated on this topic or is your adherence to the ideology of white supremacy gonna prevent you from learning the truth? https://www.thecoli.com/threads/whi...rs-the-untold-history-of-north-africa.539788/
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
23,586
Reputation
7,375
Daps
114,896
Mende and Mandingo are two different groups lol.

Researchers are pretty convinced that the Mende people are Mandingos that intermarried with Bullom people in Sierra Leone. The Mende recognize two lines of inheritance that go to that connection. They inherit paternally like the Mandingos and maternally like the Bullom. Additionally, the Mende migration story is that of the Mandingos and they live in proximity to the Mandingos in Sierra Leone. The Mende also recognize the Poro and Sande societies.
 

Apollo Creed

Look at your face
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
60,831
Reputation
14,686
Daps
226,980
Reppin
Handsome Boyz Ent
Researchers are pretty convinced that the Mende people are Mandingos that intermarried with Bullom people in Sierra Leone. The Mende recognize two lines of inheritance that go to that connection. They inherit paternally like the Mandingos and maternally like the Bullom. Additionally, the Mende migration story is that of the Mandingos and they live in proximity to the Mandingos in Sierra Leone. The Mende also recognize the Poro and Sande societies.


Man go to a Mende and ask them are they Mandingo. Lmfao this internet stuff got yall ignorant as hell to stuff because you lack the context.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
23,586
Reputation
7,375
Daps
114,896
Man go to a Mende and ask them are they Mandingo. Lmfao this internet stuff got yall ignorant as hell to stuff because you lack the context.

I spoke to some when I was in Sierra Leone doing my research. Thank you for your concern though.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,045
Daps
122,406
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
UpAndComing said:
Could that mean Africans sailed across the world and were in America before anyone, which explains why there are Black Native Americans?

No. There is NO evidence of a Black/African presence in the Americas prior to the 16th Century and Africans didn't build vessels capable of traveling the distance to the Americas with necessary provisions, non-stop, for upwards of 4 months (if not more). I say 4 months because there was a dude that successfully paddled a canoe from Europe to America, but he KNEW America was here. It took him 2 1/2 months.​
 
Top