☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,199
Reputation
-34,127
Daps
632,495
Reppin
The Deep State
There stagnation in growth in recent years has been due to the refugee crisis that America engineered through facilitating the Arab Spring and the Iraq War invasion.
No its not. If Norway wasn't blessed with oil deposits, they'd be another portugal :stopitslime:

Sweden? They had to lower taxes and they STILL can't get enough domestic growth.

Finland? Another basket case.

Some of ya'll take this shyt too far.

Even in Denmark, people say the amount they pay in taxes just isn't worth the marginal benefits they get.

Not every country is Germany :ufdup:
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
52,182
Reputation
-1,259
Daps
255,466
This is really, seemingly intentionally vague. I agree that a higher ownership stake for employees is mutually beneficial but who should get to decide what exactly is or isn't fair? From what I have seen socialists want to completely block the owners from the negotiating table.

I view the owners voice having to be equal to everyone else's. Strip them of the bourgeoisie label and influence and place them in a category of worker. Which is all they are at the end of they day. They deserve nothing more and nothing less
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,199
Reputation
-34,127
Daps
632,495
Reppin
The Deep State
I view the owners voice having to be equal to everyone else's. Strip them of the bourgeoisie label and influence and place them in a category of worker. Which is all they are at the end of they day. They deserve nothing more and nothing less
I'm convinced none of you actually work.

I'm all for higher wages, but when we start talking about management structure and accountability, its glaringly obvious none of you have ever been apart of any of these companies or know what it takes to run/start/manage one.
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
52,182
Reputation
-1,259
Daps
255,466
No its not. If Norway wasn't blessed with oil deposits, they'd be another portugal :stopitslime:

Sweden? They had to lower taxes and they STILL can't get enough domestic growth.

Finland? Another basket case.

Some of ya'll take this shyt too far.

Even in Denmark, people say the amount they pay in taxes just isn't worth the marginal benefits they get.

Not every country is Germany :ufdup:

Lack of industrial capability will hurt a country whether they are capitalist or more socialist base
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
325,199
Reputation
-34,127
Daps
632,495
Reppin
The Deep State
This is really, seemingly intentionally vague. I agree that a higher ownership stake for employees is mutually beneficial but who should get to decide what exactly is or isn't fair? From what I have seen socialists want to completely block the owners from the negotiating table.
Nah bro. If you graduate law school, you should immediately be a partner :mjlol:
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
52,182
Reputation
-1,259
Daps
255,466
I'm convinced none of you actually work.

I'm all for higher wages, but when we start talking about management structure and accountability, its glaringly obvious none of you have ever been apart of any of these companies or know what it takes to run/start/manage one.
:wow: Do you understand the concept of exploitation? :mjlol:
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,178
Reputation
7,490
Daps
105,799
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
I view the owners voice having to be equal to everyone else's. Strip them of the bourgeoisie label and influence and place them in a category of worker. Which is all they are at the end of they day. They deserve nothing more and nothing less
So if I take money I've earned, buy a building and all the equipment in it, pay all the utilities and taxes on it, I should have no more say in how the company is operated than someone who has no money in it and will not lose anything besides a paycheck if the business goes under?
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
52,182
Reputation
-1,259
Daps
255,466
More excuses.

Economics is about managing not just emotions, but motivations.

Socialism caters to the weaker of emotions and ignores the difficulty of motivation.

None of those countries have a strong raw material base, thats the bases for industrial output which leads to innovation to make the process more efficient.
 
Top