Let me guess. The people on here dislike the Warriors bc Steph is lightskint huh?
Is it possible that they don't appreciate Steph being compared to Jordan after a season and a half of good play?
Is that possible at all? Or is it just because he's lightskint?
Seems that way.
But hating on him because he's light-skinned is as pointless as hating on him because people are supposedly comparing him to Jordan (when the main shyt I hear is that Curry is the greatest shooter, not PLAYER, but SHOOTER we have ever seen). I guess when you're the best player on a team that is on pace to break the record for the greatest regular season in NBA history, you can't be compared to the best player on the team whose record might get broken... especially when their respective season averages are pretty much identical. Curry is sitting at 30.3 PPG, 6.5 RPG and 5.4 APG. The year Jordan and them when 72-10, MJ put up 30.4 PPG, 6.6 RPG and 4.4 APG. But no, let's not compare them.
So, either brehs are hard on light-skins or they're just a die-hard Jordan stan that doesn't want to see the Dubs break the record. Either way, the reasons for reactionary threads like this don't hold weight.