I think they also fouled him a couple of times near the top of the arch to prevent him from getting a shot up. I don't know if that was intentional or not but that might actually not be a bad idea. You risk getting Golden State shooting more free throws but it might actually be more efficient when Curry gets really hot. I wonder if teams have done the math on this. Sort of a hack-a-Curry to prevent him from scoring like 9 points in three quick possessions, you only give up 6 points instead at the most to prevent them from getting back in it or extending a lead in no time at all like they did to the Mavs the other night.
In one of the 1000 "Curry isn't as good as y'all think" threads here, someone posted an article of some writer suggesting exactly this, a hack-a-Curry to stop him from getting in a groove.
According to some of these clowns, the Warriors are 0-7 when other teams play real defense against them. The other 62 games were either flukes or the other teams quadruple guarded Bogut and left Curry, Klay, and Draymond open all game.
Yep, sounds like a perfect colixplanation. What's hilarious is that brehs on this site regularly argue this is the best era in basketball era talent-wise and strategy-wise, but a team winning damn near all their games is lucky
Spurs themselves are a juggernaut, don't know why brehs are reacting like this to the Warriors losing and Curry having the game he had. All I'm hoping for is for thing to go according to plan and have a SA-GSW WCF, should be great basketball
