I'm sure what is more...that tweet, or the fact this guy who responded hasn't been banned/paid a visit by the FBI.

I'm sure what is more...that tweet, or the fact this guy who responded hasn't been banned/paid a visit by the FBI.

There were faithless electors in all 3 different elections that you were talking about
In the 2000 and 2016 elections, the candidate who won the popular vote did not become president
If that can happen so frequently, its only logical to deduce that the popular vote is nowhere near as relevant as yall believe
And if it was, you wouldn't be forced to choose between 2 preselected candidates

I was talking more about before they were actually bankers/money lendersIt's a little more complicated. Jews had the backing of certain European monarchies until those monarchs incurred 'enough' debt. That's when they start getting ran out. But initially, they have govt' backing. No king is gonna let a money lender just set up shop. There are dues to be paid.![]()
Go to his latest where he went in on Roland. He was pretty clear.This is the exact opposite of what he does thoughhe has yet to give a clear solution or a tangible, feasible requirement
It’s always “getting on code” or “economic resources” which mean absolutely nothing
“Allocated earmarked resources for black people” okay, like what? Cash? Grants? Loans? Who gets them first? How do you divide it? How do you define who’s a native black person?Go to his latest where he went in on Roland. He was pretty clear.
“Allocated earmarked resources for black people” okay, like what? Cash? Grants? Loans? Who gets them first? How do you divide it? How do you define who’s a native black person?
“Land grants” okay...where? Let’s say they find some free land to give to everyone black. Here you go. Who’s paying to develop and cultivate the land? Is it in an urban area? Rural? Who’s teaching everyone how to urban plan or farm?
You know how many black folks own vacant lots and lose them to the local government because they don’t know how to develop it or afford the property taxes.
He offers nothing realistic that a politician would be able to get done, especially in a realistic amount of time.
Those aren’t specific. These are the equivalent of walking into a bank and saying “I need a loan.”That's pretty specific. And it would take sitting down with local politicians to figure it out throughout the country.
What's the beef? Those are great ideas.
You need a blueprint?
But, it a pretty damn good start, I'm saying...Those aren’t specific. These are the equivalent of walking into a bank and saying “I need a loan.”
That's much better than waiting outside the bank for 60 years, scared to come in. Just waiting for that loan to magically fall from the sky.Those aren’t specific. These are the equivalent of walking into a bank and saying “I need a loan.”
The problem is John Lewis uses his Civil Rights struggle as a trojan horse for non-black issues. Yvette Carnell is hell on the John Lewis types also.