Tariq nasheed finally went too far

CoryMack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
11,423
Reputation
2,415
Daps
41,343
There were faithless electors in all 3 different elections that you were talking about

In the 2000 and 2016 elections, the candidate who won the popular vote did not become president

If that can happen so frequently, its only logical to deduce that the popular vote is nowhere near as relevant as yall believe

And if it was, you wouldn't be forced to choose between 2 preselected candidates

Well we don't have to speculate. We can read it for ourselves in the documents surrounding the constitutional convention. When asked why certain aspects of the government were set up a certain way, why certain wording was used in the proposed constitution, some of the founders called it a "refinement." That's the word they used. It's all right there in the anti-federalist papers.

The electoral college is a "refinement." A check against the people making the "wrong" decision.
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
25,176
Reputation
2,988
Daps
80,690
Reppin
Atl
It's a little more complicated. Jews had the backing of certain European monarchies until those monarchs incurred 'enough' debt. That's when they start getting ran out. But initially, they have govt' backing. No king is gonna let a money lender just set up shop. There are dues to be paid.:usure:
I was talking more about before they were actually bankers/money lenders

Back when all they were supposed to do was hold gold for people

Back when most societies and 2/3 major religions had a direct ban on usury(lending money and charging interest on it)

They made a concentrated effort to get a ban on usury taken off the books in a certain country, immediately putting that country in debt

Then they would get kicked out of that country but they would already be financially stronger than when they entered the country

After doing that a couple times it didnt matter what a government did because they would just orchestrate conflicts to drain money from countries and force said countries to borrow money at interest

The FIRST country to allow usury literally fukked the world
 
Last edited:

Easy-E

#MakeEmMad
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
56,886
Reputation
10,392
Daps
168,560
Reppin
New Orleans/VA/Nashville
This is the exact opposite of what he does though :mjlol: he has yet to give a clear solution or a tangible, feasible requirement

It’s always “getting on code” or “economic resources” which mean absolutely nothing
Go to his latest where he went in on Roland. He was pretty clear.
 

Squirrel from Meteor Man

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
29,243
Reputation
4,339
Daps
131,064
Go to his latest where he went in on Roland. He was pretty clear.
“Allocated earmarked resources for black people” okay, like what? Cash? Grants? Loans? Who gets them first? How do you divide it? How do you define who’s a native black person?

“Land grants” okay...where? Let’s say they find some free land to give to everyone black. Here you go. Who’s paying to develop and cultivate the land? Is it in an urban area? Rural? Who’s teaching everyone how to urban plan or farm?

You know how many black folks own vacant lots and lose them to the local government because they don’t know how to develop it or afford the property taxes.

He offers nothing realistic that a politician would be able to get done, especially in a realistic amount of time.
 

Easy-E

#MakeEmMad
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
56,886
Reputation
10,392
Daps
168,560
Reppin
New Orleans/VA/Nashville
“Allocated earmarked resources for black people” okay, like what? Cash? Grants? Loans? Who gets them first? How do you divide it? How do you define who’s a native black person?

“Land grants” okay...where? Let’s say they find some free land to give to everyone black. Here you go. Who’s paying to develop and cultivate the land? Is it in an urban area? Rural? Who’s teaching everyone how to urban plan or farm?

You know how many black folks own vacant lots and lose them to the local government because they don’t know how to develop it or afford the property taxes.

He offers nothing realistic that a politician would be able to get done, especially in a realistic amount of time.

That's pretty specific. And it would take sitting down with local politicians to figure it out throughout the country.

What's the beef? Those are great ideas.

You need a blueprint?
 

Squirrel from Meteor Man

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
29,243
Reputation
4,339
Daps
131,064
That's pretty specific. And it would take sitting down with local politicians to figure it out throughout the country.

What's the beef? Those are great ideas.

You need a blueprint?
Those aren’t specific. These are the equivalent of walking into a bank and saying “I need a loan.”
 

Kerkum

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
4,514
Reputation
-545
Daps
18,272
-I hate when Tariq laughs at his own jokes
-Do you guys think they’ll Tariq on that Revolt panel? I think him getting on would be a game changer but the negro minions of these corporations won’t allow it. Hell, put Tone and Yvette on the panel as well
 

BuckFilly

Superstar
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
7,663
Reputation
1,241
Daps
16,448
Reppin
pg
Tariq pov is needed at that la revolt panel. I think he is probably above propositioning for a seat at the table but his followers should definitely campaign on his behalf on social media to get that man at that conference/summit.
 
Top