Tariq Nasheed: "Single black mothers should not receive reparations"

[Wiles]

Tariq is basically saying if we get reparations it need to be structured.

This


HHnding it out to single mothers was never an option

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

What does whatever you feel about me have to do with Tariq saying out of his own mouth that single black mothers should not get reparations?

If you want to cry and bytch about me, there’s an ongoing platinum thread where you and my other fans can do so.

I'm no fan, unlike your dyck riding stans. There's also a Tariq thread where you and yours can go dump your venting and unproductive bullshyt but yet here you are. Other than, refer to my previous comments on this thread and stop repeating the same shyt.

 

[dj-method-x]

For real. Fukkin sickening and obvious the white social programming in here.

What white social programming made Tariq say what he said?

 

[dj-method-x]

This


HHnding it out to single mothers was never an option

@Nicole0416 you agree or no?

 

[Fatboi1]

nikkas saying a breh stating "No single mothers should get reparations" should be ignored as an innocuous hot take, though.

Tell me if I am misunderstanding you, breh. @Fatboi1

See below:

Keep in mind that OP is the same poster who is very supportive of Kamala Harris whose own legal maneuvering sought to disparage single mothers and keep black fathers out of the home by not looking into cases where the defendants had evidence to disprove their guilt and her own offices prosecutorial misconduct. Not only that but her push to contribute to fatherless homes and single mothers by defying court orders that called for the early release of prisoners in order to benefit prison labor practices. More importantly ,the children of those mothers and fathers who suffer as the innocent victims of this trickle down effect.

So if we're going to talk about...let's keep it a whole 100 , and talk about ALL the issues , otherwise op could give less of a fuk, as long as it's troll race bait.

Let's also keep it a whole other level of hypocrisy when most of the coli narrative is of the foundation that "single mothers ain't shyt" but since it's omg "Tariq" , there's all this outrage when "single" mothers are usually the last in line of the "defended". Last person I need is op being "outraged" for me when I know his real motivations.

This

I ain’t a Tariq fan but this is a clearly someone trying to twist what he was saying

this also. I've seen these "Tariq is a black women hater" and 99% of the time it's someone creating a false narrative from twisted words. Like for example when they'd bring up that he allegedly "hates" black women(ridiculous assertion) because his old books on dating yet they conviently ignore the Play or be Played book he write FOR black women.

 

[Xerces]

If cats do get reperations, then they gonna fight on who or who shouldn't get them

Nah you don't get em

Yes i do, one drop rule

Man your ancestors weren't on the slave ships

But technically, this n that

Single mothers don't deserve em, what about the dudes who left em?


can't wait

 

[dj-method-x]

See below:


This

this also. I've seen these "Tariq is a black women hater" and 99% of the time it's someone creating a false narrative from twisted words. Like for example when they'd bring up that he allegedly "hates" black women(ridiculous assertion) because his old books on dating yet they conviently ignore the Play or be Played book he write FOR black women.

How are his words being twisted when in the video he literally says single black mothers shouldn’t get reparations.

Y’all are jumping to creating lengths to defend this nikka and his stupid ass words.

Y’all are like children who argue with you that Santa Claus is a real person because thats what makes them comfortable.

 

[Betty Draper]

Tariq is Right, single black mothers already get reparations.... it's called child support. Tariq knows what he's talking about all these lazy BW getting free money already real black family in single BM should be the only recipients. Tariq 2020.

What about the black men that have multiple baby mamas? Where’s the critique on them? What about single black women who don’t have kids, do they get reparations? How is child support a form of reparations? If you can bust a nut in a woman raw, you should be a man. Both parties should take responsibility and sometimes that means child support. If you don’t want ‘lazy’ black women taking your money, wrap it up .There’s no valid reason you can give as to why single black mothers who are DOS shouldn’t be given reparations.

 

[Deep_Black_Conscious]

Dumbest shyt I've heard all year.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

@Nicole0416 you agree or no?

Now you want to get all cerebral. Lol.

If you had any discernment in the first place,, you would know that he's referring to the segment of single mothers that are not already contributing to the positive aspects of their children's lives and that adding money to an already negative situation would only magnify the problems with that segment of those households. Those single mothers that use their kids for other intents and purposes or don't view the children in the right frame of mind. If that particular group of single mothers is already experiencing the consequences of their bad decisions, money would further compound the issues if not dispersed in a way that would hold them accountable. However, this does not apply to all single mothers. The same way that you don't give a person an abundance of resources without teaching and showing them the most effective methods to utilize them, that will benefit those in the long term and the children. It's called Resource Allocation and Planning.

But you got your attention grabbing thread bait headline, fuk off and stop mentioning me. Sick of your bullshyt tactics.

 

[Savvir]

......so we gonan get DNA tests done and make sure the dudes who got the single mothers pregnant dont get money either?

whats the end game in this?

sounds like the best way to disenfranchise the most susceptible black demographic ......

 

[Fatboi1]

Now you want to get all cerebral. Lol.

If you had any discernment in the first place,, you would know that he's referring to the segment of single mothers that are not already contributing to the positive aspects of their children's lives and that adding money to an already negative situation would only magnify the problems with that segment of those households. Those single mothers that use their kids for other intents and purposes or don't view the children in the right frame of mind. If that particular group of single mothers is already experiencing the consequences of their bad decisions, money would further compound the issues if not dispersed in a way that would hold them accountable. However, this does not apply to all single mothers. The same way that you don't give a person an abundance of resources without teaching and showing them the most effective methods to utilize them, that will benefit those in the long term and the children.

But you got your attention grabbing thread bait headline, fuk off and stop mentioning me. Sick of your bullshyt tactics.

Watch this clearly elucidated post get ignored..

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

I've seen these "Tariq is a black women hater" and 99% of the time it's someone creating a false narrative from twisted words.

Facts and it's the same set of people that will vocally support Steve Harvey and his "Think like a man, act like a man" when it comes down to dating and dynamics. Despite the fact that he divorced twice, has a history of exploitation/emotional abuse, and his latest wife is a mother who had children by two cousins in the same family after one went to jail, in trying to chase that bag, and his daughter is an unwed mother .

 

[dj-method-x]

Now you want to get all cerebral. Lol.

If you had any discernment in the first place,, you would know that he's referring to the segment of single mothers that are not already contributing to the positive aspects of their children's lives and that adding money to an already negative situation would only magnify the problems with that segment of those households. Those single mothers that use their kids for other intents and purposes or don't view the children in the right frame of mind. If that particular group of single mothers is already experiencing the consequences of their bad decisions, money would further compound the issues if not dispersed in a way that would hold them accountable. However, this does not apply to all single mothers. The same way that you don't give a person an abundance of resources without teaching and showing them the most effective methods to utilize them, that will benefit those in the long term and the children. It's called Resource Allocation and Planning.

But you got your attention grabbing thread bait headline, fuk off and stop mentioning me. Sick of your bullshyt tactics.

Where in Tariq’s comments did he even IMPLY that he was only talking about a select group of single mothers. The man was pretty clear when he said “only families where the head of the house hold is a man should get reparations, not single mothers.”

Take your rose colored glasses off for once. It’s crazy how you have all this venom for me, who has never shytted on you or single mothers, but when Tariq shyts on you directly you are in here splaining and caping like a muffukka.

Disgusting...

 

[Scustin Bieburr]

Instead of addressing the topic you attack the messenger. Y’all are something else I swear. Scary stuff on here.

For some people, it goes beyond respect for a person. They fuse their personality with that person so an attack on him is taken very personally.

I'd been listening to tariq since the macklessons radio days, I've watched all the hidden colors films. I appreciate some of the ideas he puts out there like:
-supporting black businesses
-self improvement
-ignoring media that depicts us as passive victims or tries to show our suffering as noble.

But he has gone out of pocket. Hes beginning to lose relevance and so he is getting more and more extreme with his views in an attempt to stay relevant. Moor us was a failed venture. His apps are struggling, his news site melanoid nation was last updated in August 2018. He no longer invites intellectuals on the show and interviews them in a structured and organized way, he throws claims out and doesn't bother to cite his sources consistently.

He is trying the controversy based marketing but it's not really working as much anymore. Hes said multiple times hes not interested in being an authoritative leader figure. There are people though who will fight and dismiss any who disagree no matter how respectfully they do it. Why? Because those individuals have built him up as something he isnt and never said he was and they have invested too much time into him. They can't go back now because of how it will make them look. It's called motivated reasoning.

I used to fukk heavily with his message and I still do support his basic ideas but I dont recognize him anymore and I cant get on board with some of the Alex jones level bullshyt hes spouting these days.