No, you're just a lying dumb fuk, but we all know that's about. Anyway, those same baby boomers with money and perceived influence are the same segment that stayed in alliance with do-nothing policies, for donations. Byron Allen has mentioned himself that players like Al Sharpton, Obama were never put to task in following through with social causes and restorative justice policy; there's no point of having money and influence, if the implementation is not there. Like a poster mentioned, historically, the church tries to play the middle and that's what we don't need bc it sends a message that our so-called representatives can be bought and sold.
No one is saying this is a "bad thing", what people are doing is expressing concern about how this will impact the original mission and intent of a grassroots movement and campaign in terms of mainstream influence bc what is not needed is for this to cycle out or become watered down bc people are stagnated bc of said influence. If you had any analytical skills, you would know the difference.
I quoted you as an example, not because I think your comments are all that thoughtful or provoking
That's the racist Papa John's owner with the leader of this Natl. Church Convention 
