Nah it is true tho, 37K on a no named league against a no name opponent is great. Especially for only 3 weeks.I get his point and yes URL helps a lot and Twork wouldn't be getting 37K against a no name opponent if he never had been on URL probably. But even that isn't for sure. Any non big league battle that does over 200 K either one of the battlers is huge or it went viral for another reason.
I think A ward showing the difference in numbers is overshadowing the point he was making.
What he's saying is, numbers don't equate TALENT.
He's saying Twork is fire wether he's having a 400K battle on URL or 40K on a no name league.
He even uses himself using the fans logic by saying he did 50K on a noname league (outside of KOTD) which in essence is the same thing as Twork doing 40K on a noname league, that's undeniable.
Not saying they're equally talent, but the point is the same. Views don't equate TALENT.
B Dot woulda had the exact same point with that fan.
Funny enough B Dot (who debated the same stigma cause he wasn't on URL) agreed and co-signed A Ward's point
Verb vs Hennyman on a noname leaugue 100K
Twork vs Radio B on a noname league 40K
Rex vs Billy on a noname league 100K
The same battlers do 1M on URL.
His point is, they are FIRE regardless.
They don't hit that M if they're not on URL, that's undeniable and the point A Ward was making.
DOT does 800K on URL, that's their fan base pushing his numbers.
Cause DOT does 80K on Syndicate which is a known league.
Therefor A Ward said, people can't downplay his talent cause he does 50K on a noname league like other popular battlers on the biggest league by using hat logic.
So no, he wasn't dissing Twork he was showing the reality of being on URL and OFF URL
B Dot, A Ward, Loso are all saying the same thing if you're following their Twitter debates with those fans that downplay their talent cause their not on URL