I mean, logically speaking, why WOULD they ban Goodz? He fukked up RBE's event, not theirs.
Just from their perspective. I don't recall what happened, if anything, in the aftermath of Goodz throwing that bottle in the Hollow battle though. Somebody jog my memory. That was actually a worse offense, to me, since it endangered paying fans.
It's up to each league to make their own decision though, that's all I'm saying. If URL decided to ban Goodz because of some shyt he did on RBE, I wouldn't be opposed to that either. I AM however opposed to the idea of ANY of this being mandatory or arbitrary.I knew URL wouldn't ban Goodz but something has to give though, too. CAPS was right. nikkas cause an altercation somewhere and still gets booked is setting a bad tone. As much as I want to see Goodz battle, I'm not opposed if there was a rule in place for him to be suspended. But see its not just URL. You have to look at ll the major leagues in particular that have booked him and future leagues that could book him.
Plus you have to remember, just because one league goes thru some shyt, that doesn't mean people on the outside will separate league by league on what happened. Remember when Math and Diz fought on KOTD before the first Traffic card was supposed to go down in L.A.? Remember how they had to move to another venue last minute? I vaguely recall the reason Math and Diz fighting was the reason that URL had to find a different venue. SO my point is, using that as a thing of "oh well, they fukked up so and so's event and not theirs" don't mean shyt to these venue owners that these league do business with.
They just opened up a HUGE can of worms with this shyt. Most of them are agreeing that as long as u have better bars "choking" is cool.
So Chess won damn near every battle he had last year..... Im just saying..............
He 100 percent beat (if were following these rules) Chef Trez and Ty Law
He still loses to JC and Ave


Beasley - “ Goodz, how would you like to be on Smack Vol.2 and make some extra money in your pocket.”
Goodz - “You know I’m about that bread.”
Beasley - “Well that battle you have coming up on Saturday on what’s that league again?
Goodz - “RBE?”
Beasley- “Yeah RED. I got an idea for it...”
Still not true. Trez was wiggin too much. Chess didn't have better bars than TrezThey just opened up a HUGE can of worms with this shyt. Most of them are agreeing that as long as u have better bars "choking" is cool.
He 100 percent beat (if were following these rules) Chef Trez
I think he's saying being if he were in Goodz position and had that animosity towards him but when you frame it that way, it sounds like you caping as if its 50/50. Plus if the can of worms of talking in battles has been opened which it was at that point, Jimz is almost obliged to respond. He's not gonna suddenly back down after being told he lying. The narrative would've been in that Goodz revealed something and punked him."I can see things both ways"
Ain't no two ways Tech 9 yo
I think he's saying being if he were in Goodz position and had that animosity towards him but when you frame it that way, it sounds like you caping as if its 50/50. Plus if the can of worms of talking in battles has been opened which it was at that point, Jimz is almost obliged to respond. He's not gonna suddenly back down after being told he lying. The narrative would've been in that Goodz revealed something and punked him.
I think what Blac and Tech were trying to say in the blog was that given the tension that was already there, they weren't surprised it happened but it came across like they were condoning it. For them to say that hot off the moment, of course Jimz's gonna feel a type of way, especially given the fact that Goodz made the situation hotter days prior to the battle.
At the end of the day, the battle rappers are secondary now that we know RBE lost the venue.
