nikkas so dusty and criminal bound they tripped in unison them nikkas was meant to get caught
nikkas so dusty and criminal bound they tripped in unison them nikkas was meant to get caught
"Violating" wasn't the qualifier. Post a bodycam video of someone shot in the back fleeing unarmedThe bodycam has not stopped the police from violating nyggas
You can’t be serious.

Your name and this statement…couple of years ago a black man got gunned down after the officer told him to reach for his wallet and still somehow thought it was a gun…it was his walletThis ain't the 90's anymore. You can't shoot someone for fleeing in the bodycam era
context is hard I guess... I specifically asked about fleeingYour name and this statement…couple of years ago a black man got gunned down after the officer told him to reach for his wallet and still somehow thought it was a gun…it was his wallet
Are you arguing the magnitudes of wrongful deaths, as if they arent on the same scale?context is hard I guess... I specifically asked about fleeing
are you taking a break from JC's scrotum?Are you arguing the magnitudes of wrongful deaths, as if they arent on the same scale?
No real insight to the discussion so you deflect due to lack of a reasonable answer. Remove yourself from MY scrotum, feculent scum.are you taking a break from JC's scrotum?
The irony is you deflected your way into a conversation that no one was talking to you aboutNo real insight to the discussion so you deflect due to lack of a reasonable answer. Remove yourself from MY scrotum, feculent scum.


nikka I merely asked a question I wasnt even attacking you wtf but now I am fukk you and everything you stand for you R Kelly piss drinking fakkit fukk you bytch!The irony is you deflected your way into a conversation that no one was talking to you about
I was referring to the days when a cop could shoot you in the back while fleeing and later plant a weapon on you or claim "furtive" movements and never even see a courtroom and how that shyt is virtually done with in the body cam era. The other gentlemen chose to make ad hominem attacks while talking about someone getting shot in a CAR.
I was referring to the days when a cop could shoot you in the back while fleeing and later plant a weapon on you or claim "furtive" movements and never even see a courtroom and how that shyt is virtually done with in the body cam era. The other gentlemen chose to make ad hominem attacks while talking about someone getting shot in a car.
Then you came in to dikkeat that loser and exacerbate a context-less conversation.
Save those apples vs oranges debates for ya baby momma. If you pack nuance just say it, but expecting a noble reply when you stick ya JC soiled lips in my conversation wastefully is asinine
![]()