The PC Thread - Tips, Benchmarks, Specs, Laptops, Custom Desktops, Pre-Builds and more.

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,269
Reputation
2,725
Daps
44,723
looks like Crysis 3 is Crysis all over again. everyone's mad their herp-derp graphics card(s) can't max it out

Crysis 3 PC Performance Thread - NeoGAF

nvidia-geforce-314-07-whql-drivers-crysis-3-performance-chart-650.png
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,269
Reputation
2,725
Daps
44,723
I think that Crysis performance puts all the 'next-gen console' talk into an interesting perspective

it also exposes the funny style of high-end PC gamers that act like life is over if it dips to 40fps
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,269
Reputation
2,725
Daps
44,723
Them Titan benches on initial drivers, :noah:

Wonder how they clock compared to 690s.

I guess nvidia won't let them publish benches yet:

Ready For The Numbers? : Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan 6 GB: GK110 On A Gaming Card

Nobody likes a tease. Unfortunately, Nvidia is asking that GeForce GTX Titan’s benchmark results remain confidential for another couple of days. We’re naturally using that time to generate as much data as possible: comparisons against GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 690, and Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition; two-way and three-way SLI configurations to pit against 690s in four-way SLI; power consumption; heat; noise; and of course, compute performance. Even when we are able to publish the outcome of our testing, GeForce GTX Titan won't be available for you to buy. The company says to expect availability the week of February 25.

Given the numbers we’ve already run using earlier drivers, along with the information presented today, what can we say about Nvidia’s GeForce GTX Titan? I’ve actually seen enough to draw my conclusions; the upcoming data dump is only going to serve to support my opinion.

Enthusiasts shopping for ultra-high-end cards like this one know they’re not going to get a good deal. Two GeForce GTX 680s sell for about $920. Better still, two Radeon HD 7970s (which are faster) can be had for $800. And as you slide down the scale, every dollar spent tends to stretch further. That’s not what the GeForce GTX Titan is about, though.

Rather, this thing incorporates a GPU currently found in the Tesla K20X (which HP will sell you for $7,700), a cooler clearly derived from the marquee GeForce GTX 690, and a staggering 6 GB of GDDR5 memory. As you’ll soon see, the combination generally falls between a GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition in our benchmarks. That means:

1. Pay the same $1,000 for a GeForce GTX 690 if you only want one dual-slot card and your case accommodates the long board. It remains the fastest graphics solution we’ve ever tested, so there's no real reason not to favor it over Titan.

2. The Titan isn’t worth $600 more than a Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition. Two of AMD’s cards are going to be faster and cost less. Of course, they’re also distractingly loud when you hit them with a demanding load. Make sure you have room for two dual-slot cards with one vacant space between them.

3. Typically, I frown on such inelegance, but more speed for $200 less could be worth the trade-off in a roomy case.
Buy a GeForce GTX Titan when you want the fastest gaming experience possible from a mini-ITX machine like Falcon Northwest’s Tiki or iBuyPower’s Revolt. A 690 isn’t practical due to its length, power requirements, and axial-flow fan.

4. Buy a GeForce GTX Titan if you have a trio of 1920x1080/2560x1440/2560x1600 screens and fully intend to use two or three cards in SLI. In the most demanding titles, two GK110s scale much more linearly than four GK104s (dual GeForce GTX 690s). Three Titan cards are just Ludicrous Gibs!


We appreciate Nvidia’s continued attention to acoustics. We’re glad to see the GeForce GTX Titan exhausting all of its hot air. And as you’ll see in a couple of days, there’s a lot to like about this card’s performance. Our beef is with its stratospheric price tag, which limits the Titan to small form factor gaming boxes and multi-card configurations in ultra-high-end PCs. Most enthusiasts will rightly balk at this card. But if you’re in its target demographic, the GeForce GTX Titan is essentially unrivaled.

also waiting on part 2 of this:

AnandTech - NVIDIA's GeForce GTX Titan, Part 1: Titan For Gaming, Titan For Compute
 

CTech83

Pro
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
2,401
Reputation
170
Daps
1,964
Reppin
NY
Anyone looking for a Crysis 3 Origin Code? I have 1 left and will let it go for $40.

Let me know

You still got that code breh? :dwillhuh:

I'm thinking about copping it, but i'm afraid that shyt might cause my PC to burst into flames.


my GTX 570 is so :flabbynsick:

So it my 560Ti :snoop:

I wanna upgrade that shyt, but everyone has been telling me to wait on the 700 series. They need to hurry up and drop that shyt. :aicmon:
 

itsyoung!!

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,680
Daps
110,423
Reppin
Bay Area
looks like Crysis 3 is Crysis all over again. everyone's mad their herp-derp graphics card(s) can't max it out

Crysis 3 PC Performance Thread - NeoGAF

nvidia-geforce-314-07-whql-drivers-crysis-3-performance-chart-650.png

their CPU must be shytty.. I was getting 40 fps , streaming with a horrible CPU (which is downing the FPS) without streaming and a 670 I get over 60 fps no problem

EA games are just about the CPU as it is the GPU. Sometimes more.
 

itsyoung!!

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,680
Daps
110,423
Reppin
Bay Area
I think that Crysis performance puts all the 'next-gen console' talk into an interesting perspective

it also exposes the funny style of high-end PC gamers that act like life is over if it dips to 40fps

If someone is playing at 60 fps and someone is playing at 40 fps, its a huge advantage to the person at 60 fps..


Speaking of Crysis 3 and streaming, I felt motivated to upgrade my computer today. Did not intend to spend $535 (after taxes) though :whew:

Bought a i7-3770k and new motherboard to go along with it :takedat:

Im boutta be streaming max settings at like 70+ fps on crysis 3 :to:


im coming from a AMD X4 955 :scusthov:
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,269
Reputation
2,725
Daps
44,723
their CPU must be shytty.. I was getting 40 fps , streaming with a horrible CPU (which is downing the FPS) without streaming and a 670 I get over 60 fps no problem

EA games are just about the CPU as it is the GPU. Sometimes more.

gtx 680
i7 3960x (aka $1000 cpu)

nvidia-geforce-314-07-whql-drivers-gtx-680-performance.png


40fps

but remember, they're using 4x MSAA. that's usually a killer. I don't have the game yet, but I remember the beta had other options, like SMAA, FXAA, and TXAA. also remember these are from the campaign, and not multiplayer
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,269
Reputation
2,725
Daps
44,723
That Titan is calling me, but I think I'll wait until the new systems drop to do a refresher.

seems like they're saying it's not worth it, unless you wanna go crazy and put 2 in your machine

at least wait to see more independent benchmarks
 

2gunsup

Satsui No Hado
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,382
Reputation
450
Daps
3,375
Reppin
Popozudas
I'm going to continue to rock out with my 580s. I hardly play anything nowadays to justify dual Titans, :manny:

I will though be rocking out with dual 700's or 8000s whenever they come out on a Haswell build, :troll:
 
Top