The rise of OPEN RELATIONSHIPS [a HOT TOPIC] [Is the movement that will TAKE OVER 2016?!?]

[Vice Queen]

I agree, but if the media pushes it hard enough it will become normalized. I think its a dangerous road to go down and only leads to more potential headache and heart break along with callous and hollowness in the long run. Its a young thing, never met an older person that is a happy open relationship....sounds ridiculous to even say.

I got two girls and they get along like I'm Lou Will

Although that arrangement imploded.

 

[Express]

i want other women tbh but the thought of my girl gettin pounded by another dude would kill me
i thought about it tbh

 

[Art Barr]

aight so just stick with hookers?

Hookers should be frowned upon as a main rathole for a guy to have a mate..yet, prostitution does serve a purpose to a man.
It serves no purpose to a female at all as a female is selling her virtue and virtue for a woman can not be re-established, or replaced once it is gone..
that is why jayz's poignant once a good girl is gone she is gone forever statement.
is what it is in its prolificness.
As it shows a woman who lacks virtue has no value as a committal.
Prostitutes are only healthy for guys in war.
Plus, for civilians in only one manner.
A male, should only use hookers.
So, you can stop being green with females in bed.
Hookers should only be used as a mental booster..to turn on any missing ability you may have from being a white knight.
to squelch being a white knight completely.
So, you can get used to directing and dominating a female as a mate.
To create the energy that makes women turn on being submissive.
By hiring a prostitute you are paying a women for her submission and you should be using the experience.
to develop understanding how a female acts and how to navigate making her be submissive, for future experience with female suitors.
Then, hopefully learning from that experience.
how to be malleable to a prospective mate or committal.
to enhance the quality of mating and male/female domination/submission ideals.
needed to be established and present in the male/female dialectic.
For a potential healthy committal based relationship in the future with a prospective female mate.


Art Barr

Yo, old grandpa who went to war.
Knew how to keep grandma because he definitely got to understand building a relationship with a submissive woman.
All because they were at war and had to pay for a female to be submissive. given the circumstances and ordeal of war they were in.
So, they got practice with and soon learned.
how to replicate the energy that creates submission with their prospective female long term mate and possible committal.


Art Barr

 

[Express]

Although that arrangement imploded.

it did?

 

[TooLazyToMakeUp1]

Alot of women can't handle FWB relationships after a little while, so there's few who would actually go for open relationships without drama

If you're a guy going for this type of bullshyt, the ghost of your forefathers need to kill you in your sleep


1 simple relationship is so much more easy and manageable. I understand that now. Unplanned pregnancy and the sheen are in the cut outchea

 

[Vice Queen]

it did?

Last i heard. I'm not into keeping up with athlete's lives that much, I ain't fukking them.

 

[BaggerofTea]

fukk no

 

[Raava]

Have not read the thread.
Yet on guys who say they are in open relationships and caught feelings.
Chances are they had no game.
Plus, more than likely fell for being a friend to an ex and have not lived a little. to know that they don't have a commitment anymore.
Yet, are still doing things.
they did, under the same context.
When him and the female were in committals.
When, he should have never agreed to be friends with an ex..plus, in a mate based ideal with an ex..
Where a line was drawn not to partake in committals based activities while in a non-commitment based framework.
You don't do things a committed couple would do.
In a non-committal based arena there is only mating and it should be kept that way.
If one of the parties wants to move it into the realm of offering more than mating into other amenities.
They need to set variables and ground rules.
Plus, draw a line in the sand not to do more than mate and any bf/gf stuff needs to be eliminated.
Plus, both if they reach the plateau where both have issues moving forward.
they need to not mate any longer.
as it has run its course and move around from one another.
Yet, bytch nikkaz, and simps hoard coochie and females, who lack virtue build.
So, that is the issue..get rid of emotions based coochie hoarders and females who are monetarily based, lack virtue and are roster builders.
When eventually coochie hoarders and roster builders will be phased out, eventually.
If people were able to get their game right.
Yet, we stay in capitalism and white boys do not have any intimate game beyond monetary show of capital.
So, there in lies the problem, moving forward..as the braintrust to non-committal based relationships will be compromised by coochie hoarders who also become soft johns.
All, because they will pay or offer amenities.
so a female will hopefully look the other way to the bullshyt fukkery.
Yet, that will ruin it all because neither party has any actual game. to keep the entire male/female dialectic.
All from being compromised in a non-committal based ideal.
Meaning , white men will ruin the dynamic of non-committal mating based ideals.
All because white males are all soft johns in nature and have to offer more than just mating to get on.
So, there is the problem.
Especially, since white men are working on applied knowledge.
After studying, any and everything they can to grasp.
To get an edge they are not capable of creating via human connection and intimacy.
As, white men do not actually create intrigue and intimacy.
They create a soft John world to attract a mate and also for committals..they have no game outside monetarily showing their hand.

White men don't even approach women.
They use their legacy status from their parents and their monetary worth of their families to court females and go out in groups.
That are already paired before they hit the bar to drink away a lack of human connection to establish a soft John connection.
It is a white man's world and white men really don't know how to connect to woman at all.
So, they created a soft John court state.
built around female slavery and denying resources to get and keep a mate.
Which as we get further along in human history.
Is being challenged by those not in power.
Which is why we get the ability to know and partake in non-mainstream ideals base on just mating.
Which will eventually be compromised because of white people and white men being soft johns.

Art Barr

My faces (my reading face)

You were right the guy in that thread had no game and was a soft john especially after he saw how it was going to go and stayed.

I get what you are saying. In a non traditional relationship you can't operate with the traditional rules of monogamy? If so I agree, but I don't think to not want to be in an open relationship means no game. It's a choice, a lot of people just don't want that life style and what to connect on a level where feelings are equally caught which is what you can't do if you are in an open relationship.

 

[Ashley Banks]

Against it.

 

[MoonGoddess]

So is an open relationship just about fukking other people? Because thats the main reason i hear when this discussion arises. I never here a discussion on family dynamics, how they'll be perceived by society, love, future goals plans, nothing. Just having the ability to have sex with others. It's not for me and like someone else said i'd rather be alone.

 

[WaveGang]

I think people spend too much energy making sure their partner doesn't cheat that it leads to a sorta self fulling thing.

This is true.

Never tell someone you been cheated on either. That's a green light

 

[mcdivit85]

I think they may become a trend the same way that homosexuality has become a trend. People simply wanting to ride a wave that they are not really into but want to be associated with for a plethora of reasons. Like Glory Johnson type sh#t....gay until the realities of that lifestyle start to mount up.

I don't believe most people can deal with being in open relationships. It sounds fun in concepts and even more fun when you're thinking of your end. You having the freedom to meet, date and have sex with someone(s) new here and there. Being able to be open about your desires and having the ability to act on them while still maintaining your relationship at home. Seemingly free from guilt and repercussion.

But, if you can do that, that means your partner can do the same. Your partner has the freedom to meet, date and have sex with someone(s) new here and there. Your partner is open about their desires to have sex with someone else this weekend and still expects you to be there when they get back.

Dudes might love the idea of being able to meet a chick at a bar and take her home. No strings attached, no lying and no guilt when they get home. But what about when their chick is the one getting picked up at the bar, getting dug out and coming back home with rearranged uterus while he's watching Sportscenter.

And chicks might like the idea of more than one man to please her. But what about her husband coming home with the smell of another woman's perfume protruding from his crotch area while she lays in bed pretending to be asleep.

It's all good until it actually happens.

Peace

 

[The Mad Titan]

I think they may become a trend the same way that homosexuality has become a trend. People simply wanting to ride a wave that they are not really into but want to be associated with for a plethora of reasons. Like Glory Johnson type sh#t....gay until the realities of that lifestyle start to mount up.

I don't believe most people can deal with being in open relationships. It sounds fun in concepts and even more fun when you're thinking of your end. You having the freedom to meet, date and have sex with someone(s) new here and there. Being able to be open about your desires and having the ability to act on them while still maintaining your relationship at home. Seemingly free from guilt and repercussion.

But, if you can do that, that means your partner can do the same. Your partner has the freedom to meet, date and have sex with someone(s) new here and there. Your partner is open about their desires to have sex with someone else this weekend and still expects you to be there when they get back.

Dudes might love the idea of being able to meet a chick at a bar and take her home. No strings attached, no lying and no guilt when they get home. But what about when their chick is the one getting picked up at the bar, getting dug out and coming back home with rearranged uterus while he's watching Sportscenter.

And chicks might like the idea of more than one man to please her. But what about her husband coming home with the smell of another woman's perfume protruding from his crotch area while she lays in bed pretending to be asleep.

It's all good until it actually happens.

Peace

Pretty much how I see it, it probably seems great until the person your in the open relationship with starts to get distance and you know they off hanging with or talking to chick or guy such and such, when he laughing and smiling at everything Lacey does or says and hardly even looks or cracks a smile with you....Now what? Of course you follow suit, at that point its not even an "relationship" anymore.


The whole ideal is flawed imo and only good for the person that can benefit the most out of it, be it the man or woman. Just dont get into a relationship, date and enjoy the company of as many men or women as you want.....its selfish to do anything other.

 

[Vice Queen]

Pretty much how I see it, it probably seems great until the person your in the open relationship with starts to get distance and you know they off hanging with or talking to chick or guy such and such, when he laughing and smiling at everything Lacey does or says and hardly even looks or cracks a smile with you....Now what? Of course you follow suit, at that point its not even an "relationship" anymore.


The whole ideal is flawed imo and only good for the person that can benefit the most out of it, be it the man or woman. Just dont get into a relationship, date and enjoy the company of as many men or women as you want.....its selfish to do anything other.

People want that comfort of having someone waiting for them though.

 

[Art Barr]

I agree, but if the media pushes it hard enough it will become normalized. I think its a dangerous road to go down and only leads to more potential headache and heart break along with callous and hollowness in the long run. Its a young thing, never met an older person that is in a happy open relationship....sounds ridiculous to even say.

i was fine in a non-committal based arena and did not create any strife to the women.
i was in a non-committals and mating with.
plus, it is documented on here as well.
you can create strictly mating based non-committals situations with women.
you and them just have to create the page to be on, and understand where to draw to line.
if a conflict of interest arises that would infringe upon both male and female's non committal status.


art barr