**The World Cup 2018 Official Thread**

[JDH]

Matuidi's wife looks like light skin. So I don't get the issue there. Pogba mad dark skin. Doesn't bother me if he has a white wife. The kids still gonna come out melanated.

Only possible c00n you've identified is Varane. He's too light skin to be messing with a white woman.

Confirmed troll

 

[Swagnificent]

The reason Kane only scores from penalties or set pieces is because England only really scores from set pieces or penalties. They have only scored 3 in open play Alli, Linguard and Kane which he knew nothing about
He scores all types of goals week In week out in the premier league against all teams unlike Lukaku who often goes missing against the top teams
The majority of his goals come against the bottom 12 of the league

Look that crakkka is trash. I've seen enough of him to see he can't dribble or go at defenders like Lukaku. Who cares about his numbers in the premier league.

Soccer is about skills. And in terms of skill Lukaku is world's better. And you know it.

You prolly only sukkin that cac off cause he's white like you.

 

[Swagnificent]

um...no there was actually a statistic somewhere that Kane gets the most chances in the premier league and also misses the most chances. Lukaku barely got service playing for Mourinho's United side.

edit: just checked, Kane came in first place and shot 184 times at goal last season and Lukaku only shot 87 times last season and his conversion rate wasn't better than Lukaku's

Thank you for this post.

I don't watch club soccer but I've seen enough from this world cup to know that Kane is trash and Lukaku a dog.

Kane looks like he's nothing more than the great white hope for the British cacs.

 

[MikeyC]

honestly breh....we just prefer the french players better bro. It is what it is.

French players just have better connections to Africa. The nonwhite Brit players just seem swagless and are less black

Fair enough, but let's not try to masquerade support of the French players as some sort of corny racially charged crusade against "the Colonizers"

 

[Premeditated]

Fair enough, but let's not try to masquerade support of the French players as some sort of corny racially charged crusade against "the Colonizers"

that's few people though. Most of us rooting for France because they are blacker, have swag, better players and we can relate more to them more.

 

[Dushane Hill]

I can see England somehow beating Croatia then winning the final in similar fashion to how Chelsea won the CL in 2012

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

What do the World Cup semi-finalists all have in common? Immigration

In total 23 players – exactly 50% – in Didier Deschamps’ and Roberto Martínez’s squads – can trace their ancestry to Africa. In countries where the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates that 6.8% and 12.1% respectively of the population is comprised of migrants, it is an astounding statistic that indicates just how important integration has been.

Now that that's settled, it simply becomes a matter of which colonialism/neo-colonialism you detest more.

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

I can see England somehow beating Croatia then winning the final in similar fashion to how Chelsea won the CL in 2012

 

[Bboystyle]

I can see England somehow beating Croatia then winning the final in similar fashion to how Chelsea won the CL in 2012

They dont have a Drogba to save them

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

@Swagnificent - exquisite trolling

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

They dont have a Drogba to save them

If Southgate plays the yung gawd Rashford the right way - but I don't want England to win.

 

[StretfordRed]

It’s coming, lads


Pause

 

[DStyles]

It’s coming, lads


Pause

It’s coming home where it belongs




Tell cacnificent I said he can suck my dikk.

 

[StretfordRed]

It’s coming home where it belongs




Tell cacnificent I said he can suck my dikk.

All jokes aside - if it really does come home, I literally think this country will implode

It's mad enough us getting to the semi's.

They've done so well so far

 

[merklman]

um...no there was actually a statistic somewhere that Kane gets the most chances in the premier league and also misses the most chances. Lukaku barely got service playing for Mourinho's United side.

edit: just checked, Kane came in first place and shot 184 times at goal last season and Lukaku only shot 87 times last season and his conversion rate wasn't better than Lukaku's

Was about to ask for the receipts but you're right for last season

However what i did notice was Kane got 30 last season compared to Lukaku 16

And extrapolated over their PL career, last season is sloppier for Kane bringing his average down, while its the opposite for Romelu



Overall stats they both have the same shooting accuracy, its just that Kane is significantly more prolific that Lukaku

Harry Kane Statistics | Premier League

Spoiler

Kane
Goals108
Goals per match0.71
Headed goals16
Goals with right foot64
Goals with left foot27
Penalties scored14
Freekicks scored1
Shots596
Shots on target269
Shooting accuracy %45%
Hit woodwork19
Big chances missed67

Overall Stats Lukaku: Romelu Lukaku Statistics | Premier League

Spoiler

Lukaku
Goals101
Goals per match0.46
Headed goals21
Goals with right foot26
Goals with left foot53
Penalties scored6
Freekicks scored1
Shots626
Shots on target284
Shooting accuracy %45%
Hit woodwork19
Big chances missed71