If we get as politcial, they won't have a choice.
Ever notice every damn president comes down to some country state that looks like this;
Those folks vote in chunks
And these politicians need this
There aren't even 400,000 black families worth $1 mil, why do we think we just need to work harder?
- Thread starter Easy-E
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 6 certs black power politics wealth
Ever notice every damn president comes down to some country state that looks like this;
Those folks vote in chunks
And these politicians need this
David_TheMan
Banned
Total black population of the US is 13%, you greatly over estimate the strength the US black population could have using the political process, if even 100% of the total black population could vote it would mean nothing in the face of a society that is wholly anti-black.If we get as politcial, they won't have a choice.
Ever notice every damn president comes down to some country state that looks like this;
Those folks vote in chunks
And these politicians need this
So the question to you is this, white folks said no already, you gonna keep on asking or are
Nah breh you need to read what I wrote better.
I didn't ask what determined the stat I asked why is it occuring, what is the cause behind there not being a certain amount of black families worth 1 mil.
That was question #2, question #1 was was is the rate of growth in black families becoming worth 1mil over time.
All three have severely poor groups as well? Why does no one talk about this when they say the like communism. Cubas poverty rate is not a directly related to the us embargo and Russia/China have huge percentages of their population that is poor.
In fact they only way to get rich would be harder for black ppl in America bc in those countries they are selected.
Atleast here in America we can try to work together and some of us get rich
Politician participation = begging, asking ????
If you're arguing against political participation there's no need
And I'm not talking just voting and marching
Okay, I understand now.
Simply politics (like the ones that empower UBER, Airbnb, [I have great videos on those two] and Amazon) have change the way the average Americans can make money as the concept of labor has changed
And because black people have historically lagged behind white people because of said politics and because we don't produce anything (ex like the families McDonald's buys it's OJ from) it's hitting us worst
We own less than 1% of farmable land in the US (that's 1% of land worth 14 billion) (5 white people own more than us)
5 White People Own More Rural Land Than All Black People Combined - Black Wealth Channel
David_TheMan
Banned
The political process for blacks in the US amounts to begging, especially after they already told us no, fukk off and you'll like what we give you.
Okay, here's an example;
2018 elections; we are not voting for anyone who doesn't have some sort of agenda to address the issues explicitly stating they are for black Americans.
Again, I don't blame you for not trusting politics.
Jhoon
Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
That’s not even close to the solution either.
* I can’t be the only one that remembers Paris Hilton making $100k being a DJ *
Breh not sure what your talking about capitalism has built China and Vietnam. They are ruled by a communism ideology but practice a capitalists monetary system. Especially in China it has been a capitalists system for the past 40 years.
Also China and Vietnam enslaved people!
Russia failed is because it had a planned economy.
Last edited:
AlainLocke
Banned
China isn't a capitalist country...
And Vietnam isn't a capitalist country...
How can a country be capitalist when the bulk of the industry is owned by the state, has a one party gov't that is dedicated to installing communism, and everyone is required to be educated in Marxism?
Communism and Socialism requires Capitalism...just like Capitalism requires a large workforce and industrial capabilities if not...we would still be serfs and at the very worse slaves...
The communist party in China and Vietnam understands this. Even Marx himself said that only socialism and ultimately communism can occur in a very industrialized country. Therefore China and Vietnam allows capitalist activity within it's economy while maintaining control over capitalist enterprise.
Calling China and Vietnam capitalist is like calling the USA a direct democracy because any US citizen over 18 gets to vote...
USSR failed due to the Cold War, giving into Western military aggression...as the USA engaged in multiple proxy wars and rampant military spending...which Russia desperately tried to keep up with. USSR failed due to the rest of world allowing the USA to threaten the security of the world with wars on every continent due to not liking Eastern Europeans and Asians and Black and Brown people being free from Western imperialism.
USSR decided to reform and eventually disband and gave into the USA's demands because the USSR couldn't keep up with the USA's spending.
I wouldn't say that a country that was nothing but farmland filled with peasant farmers and within a couple of decades after a revolution and WW2, sent rockets into space and industrialized their economy....lifting millions out of poverty...failed due to the nature of their economy...
USSR and China actually proved that a planned economy works..and works better than capitalism at eliminating poverty while at the same time preventing rampant income inequality.
all out war. nonwhites all deciding they will no longer contribute and uphold a system of white supremacy.
you're asking why black americans are poor in america? lol
David_TheMan
Banned
You need to take your time and read as well.
I'm asking to investigate and try to understand why the millionaire homes number is happening.
If you are of the opinion that you are poor if you don't have a family worth 1 mil, you probably need to adjust what you think the income in the US looks like, the vast majority of all americans aren't millionaires
Again you don't know what your talking about. Capitalism isnt a binary byproduct and yes just because some business are state owned doesn't means that it falls under the definition of communism for economy. Xiaoping ( 鄧小平) plans followed by the 80's reform were all capitalisti in nature "all". The government setup and tested free market economy zone to get the right balance and then expanded on them from Micro to Marco levels. From property rights to rural competitions and slew of other reforms to tired to mention. Chinese rise to power is because of capaitist intentions and planning. Not sure why we even talking about this it self evidence.
Russia failed because there economy wasnt robust enough to deal with free market shocks. It happens with planned economies and it is a stupid discussion caused we already saw what happened.
