I can't know a woman's sexual history...whether she's been in 3 long relationships or had 18 short ones by age 30.His fears about her sexual history? What if she's been in several serious relationships - and doesn't have much of a history? Age doesn't dictate promiscuity - personality does. Anyway, everyone has their preferences and that's cool - I just think some of these reasons are bullshyt![]()
But on a general level...the older you are, the more relationships you've had.
That's just playing the odds.
Not saying a 35 year old woman is a slut compared to a 22 year old. But if sexual history matters to someone...the 22 year old is going to be the more attractive option (based on that 1 characteristic).
But there are, admittedly, more (and more important) characteristics that one looks for the older one is.
okay. Hard to believe that a 30+ year old man will have much in common with a 22 year old, but that's cool. We are talking COMMITMENT here and not someone to "smash." Keep in mind that this theory is pretty backwards because at 22, very few girls are ready for someone more serious and so you're risking putting a ring on it and her leaving you or cheating saying she needs to explore different options...hence, her getting more "mileage" as you guys would put it, during your relationship as opposed to it being her past. Just giving a different perspective. I was a virgin until 21, so sure, maybe at 22 I would have been "more sexually" attractive having had fewer experiences, but mentally I definitely wouldn't have been there to give a 30+ year old man any kind of meaningful relationship.
