Could you elaborate?In a pure economic sense yes. He, as usual oversimplifies things. He's brilliant don't get me wrong but he has a tendency to oversimplify social matters.
Could you elaborate?In a pure economic sense yes. He, as usual oversimplifies things. He's brilliant don't get me wrong but he has a tendency to oversimplify social matters.
Welfare is a drop in the fukkin bucket yo.
A program largely utilized by poor white people.
You want to help people get on their feet?
Cut back the 700 billion dollar spending each year toward the military and invest that money into schools, manufacturing, infrastructure and social programs that keep kids out of boredom and trouble so they develop skills and get interested in shyt that might propel them to lucrative careers.
Motherfukkers.
Thats was their only intent. Only.he's wrong. welfare makes nothing worse. which is really social responsibility ( and indirectly helps us all )
But having so called welfare without more focus on Early childhood education and free first two years of college --------- is like giving up on our society.
Do people understand that cutting the milltary budget effects people just as much as it woild cutting welfare?
Thats was their only intent. Only.
funny isnt it?
Go on...
Their intent was to siphon the wealth. Those without were meant to have nothing. When they put children on the train tracks and tie them to it, isnt it pointless to print in the newspaper that a child died by a train?what are you saying?
He isn't flat-out wrong. Welfare's availability lead to generational hubris. As long as it is there, people haven't put a magnifying glasshe's wrong. welfare makes nothing worse. which is really social responsibility ( and indirectly helps us all )
But having so called welfare without more focus on Early childhood education and free first two years of college --------- is like giving up on our society.
Do people understand that cutting the milltary budget effects people just as much as it woild cutting welfare?
Their intent was to siphon the wealth. Those without were meant to have nothing. When they put children on the train tracks and tie them to it, isnt it pointless to print in the newspaper that a child died by a train?
Go on...
He isn't flat-out wrong. Welfare's availability lead to generational hubris. As long as it is there, people haven't put a magnifying glass
over things that require more scrutiny, as in why funding is so lopsided in minority neighborhoods vs others, how standardized testing fukks
with urban public schools more than rural ones, etc.
Think of Walmart: Pay shytty wages and encourage its own workers to get on welfare to fill the gaps of their lack of gainful employment.
Welfare overall helps people of all backgrounds, but it also placates people who really should be questioning the system more.
Oh absolutely. I say it all the time, and this is with respect to the entire American population, but the only way for things to get better is for themEvery person should be questioning the system more.
Welfare has produces and spawned some of our greatest so called Americans when they were children.
The generational laziness is anecdotal and is less than 10%. Most poor people want to do better. Some do still end up on welfare like their parents, but We don't have systems in place that would even allow for Mass class mobility. We don't have education systems in place to allow for mass stoppage of ignorance. and this is regardless of any race.
What we do have is random nikkas making it. lol, it's funny to me because mostly everyone i know hasn't 'made it' and those of us that do....... that shyts fake. Sure we work hard - but the same system allows for a few slips in the crakks for those that are Most Willing ( not to succeed but ) to Help unknowingly perpetuate the system.
Welfare isn't affecting the top class of Americans or most politicians. They low key want to keep it going because the side affects are positive ( like feeding children, placating nikkas and Crakkers, and keeping some families going that might vote for the fake two party political system ) . What the middle class and the others who complain about the poor don't notice is that Every time we hit a recession or every time we have to give out More food stamps or every time we do any of this shyt ............... the Wealth gaps between the Middle class and the elite increases, lol. .............. When news reports say shyt like "economic turmoil' or "recession" or whatever - the rich get richer..... ..
and the Rich and the corrupt and the People who Actually DO HAVE more control of the situations are criticized 500+% Less than the poor (and 'minorities').
keeps us fighting. keeps black men talkign about welfare queens and keeps white men talking about welfare queens --- lol, and what everyone low key has in mind is slick ways of saying fat black hood bytch w a bunch of kids ............... nobody is thinking about who has the majority of welfare cases Or about their increasing wealth gaps, or the oppression of the middle class.
Not true. Corporate greed is only some of the picture. Without rampant corporate greed, we still face the issue of modernization and automationIf you address the corporate greed than welfare would not even be an issue.