But this goes both ways. If the game were played in a way where little guys would post each other up underneath the basket each possession or where little guys were asked to protect the rim consistently from guys their own height or slightly taller, they wouldn't be as good at it in terms of timing and footwork as the bigs who have developed those skills for years and years.
In fact, bigs are now learning to shoot the three well and even dribbling more as well as passing, whereas guards for the most part still aren't developing those big skills that I mentioned above. So one could argue that guys like Embiid and Jokic are more all round skilled than guys like Irving and Curry. Especially Embiid 'cause he can really dribble.
LeBron's chasedown blocks also shouldn't be undervalued in terms of requiring great skill on top of the athleticism.
That's not "both ways", that has nothing to do with what I was talking about.
Here is a graph of human height. Notice that the average man is 5'9" and the VAST majority of men are between 5'4" and 6'2". The # above 6'5" doesn't even register.
Now, people with a straight face are claiming that the most talented people in NBA history are ALL over 6'6". Do you seriously believe that there's more skill in the 15,000 Black American men over 6'6" than in the 20,000,000 Black American men under 6'6"? That's just not possible. Those 20 million Black men in the mass are going to have 1000x as many skilled individuals as the 15 thousand height outliers.
Height makes skill look more dominant. Height and athleticism makes it look more dominant still. But you have to have MUCH more skill to even survive in the NBA at 6' tall than to be an all-star at at athletic 6'9". 9 times out of 10 the most skilled guys will be the normal sized guys, if not 10 out of 10. That's why MJ could say that his 5'9" brother was always more skilled than him and just as athletic, but MJ's height was the difference between the GOAT player ever and a guy who couldn't even touch the league.