Ronnie Lott
#49erGang
i would rathr play on filed turf 


There are more schools, in the South.
The Big 12,C-USA,Sun Belt, American,ACC and SEC all overlap into the south ( the most populous region in the US)....and most of America does not live in cold climates
and i'm talking the entirely of college, not D1 schools either...grass is still overwhelmingly the more common playing surface.
The injury statistics presented were from the NFL ... not college.
Look it up hoe and stop replying to me. More teams have field turf in college. Maybe 3 or 4 teams in the NFL have more grass fields than turf.
Most small colleges have field turf to have different events. No argument. You named big schools on the SEC that use their stadiums primarily for their football teams.
Look it up hoe and stop replying to me. More teams have field turf in college. Maybe 3 or 4 teams in the NFL have more grass fields than turf.
Most small colleges have field turf to have different events. No argument. You named big schools on the SEC that use their stadiums primarily for their football teams.
what school in any conference, on any level.... doesn't use their FOOTBALL stadium, primarily for their football teams?
even in regards to the SEC, only 4 schools(Ole Miss,Vandy,Mizzou,Arkansas) out of the 14 teams in the conference...have artificial surfaces. 3 of those, having Field Turf
i brought those big schools up, cause you brought up Ohio St. and Texas ( which has played on some form of turf, for the majority of the last 40 years) in some type of argument that big name schools have all switched to field turf to cut down on maintenance costs.
both of yall stop guessingboth of yall stop guessing
http://www.vanquishthefoe.com/2012/7/2/3129894/is-natural-grass-dying-in-college-football
For my simple study, I used the number of teams and conference alignments as they will be for the 2013 season.
The total number is still interesting, so let's start there. The anecdotal truth I thought was true, is true. Artificial surfaces are the norm:
SURFACE
Artificial 82 - 65%
Grass 44 - 35%
-------------BCS----- Non-BCS Schools
Artificial 47%----- 94%
Grass 53% ------ 6%
Read the article for a conference and climate analysis but its clearly all about the money. Field turf has an upfront cost but is cheap. its costing teams playmakers though. And big schools aren't switching to field turf to save money, its literally the OPPOSITE Taxman.
I think these players are working out too many parts of the body there were never meant to be worked out thus making it more susceptible to injury if that makes sense.![]()
that could be a factor but that would be apples to apples between surfaces. In fact, you've just eliminated a variable for us because we're talking about football players who have trained to be football players only forever.this right here.... Same thing is happening in baseball with every pitcher needing tommy john... They old days of a person playing 3 sports and having fun is over. They make you a 1 sport person at like 7 and train you to death... al that overdosing on training and not being allowed to play other sports (which works different mucles) is starting to put a strain on the human body....
that could be a factor but that would be apples to apples between surfaces. In fact, you've just eliminated a variable for us because we're talking about football players who have trained to be football players only forever.
I'm proposing and questioning whether for those players, that ligaments are being damaged at a greater rate from non impact events on field turf than grass.
this right here.... Same thing is happening in baseball with every pitcher needing tommy john... They old days of a person playing 3 sports and having fun is over. They make you a 1 sport person at like 7 and train you to death... al that overdosing on training and not being allowed to play other sports (which works different mucles) is starting to put a strain on the human body....


its just always been in comparison to Astroturf. This is HS level so take it with a grain of salt, but I've played on field turf at detroit country day (
on top of that, Our bodies just aren't meant to be playing on shyt like field turf or any of these artificial surfaces.
they praise the speed and grip the field has, but we've clearly been seeing the consequences of such...
) and astroturf at the silverdome and A1 primo grass at Muskegeon Reeth's Puffer...field turf is better than astro but good grass trumps all and feels better.Astro turf is that thin carpet turf that feels like concrete when you land on it. I dont think any NFL team still uses that. Plus it got hot as fukk.

both of yall stop guessing
http://www.vanquishthefoe.com/2012/7/2/3129894/is-natural-grass-dying-in-college-football
For my simple study, I used the number of teams and conference alignments as they will be for the 2013 season.
The total number is still interesting, so let's start there. The anecdotal truth I thought was true, is true. Artificial surfaces are the norm:
SURFACE
Artificial 82 - 65%
Grass 44 - 35%
-------------BCS----- Non-BCS Schools
Artificial 47%----- 94%
Grass 53% ------ 6%
Read the article for a conference and climate analysis but its clearly all about the money. Field turf has an upfront cost but is cheap. its costing teams playmakers though. And big schools aren't switching to field turf to save money, its literally the OPPOSITE Taxman.


dude aren't you in your late 20s at least? grow up...you sound like a total jackass.I dont know how this makes me wrong?
I said the majority of schools use turf and that may have an impact on whatever study. More kids are playing on field turf than grass
Also the cost sh1t was their reasoning.
I was right and that hoe high yellow n1gga was wrong
He stays picking arguments that arent even arguments. Smug azz n1gga.