nothing wrong with that
We just gotta keep it civil.
Anyway, the experience I have in the bio field is my associates in Biotechnology.
Not much of anything as far as knowledge goes, but I have a bit of foundation and interests in the area that keeps me reading up in the bio/chem field. While I may not have much experience, I think us having this argument is still educational and more conversations should take place on this forum and others.
Now, while I'm not saying the figures for the 2016 study/article are wrong, I'm saying I'd like to see what the studies say after their done. It mentions experiments are still ongoing and that vitamin D might help with other things.
I'm saying that specifically targeting blacks in these experiments should be our focus. There are studies that acknowledge the tests that have been used on us have been said to be inadequate when testing for blacks vitamin levels, often implying that blacks have inadequate intake. So, what we should desire from these studies is more clarity on whether the current recommendations for increase supplements will surely help, be money wasted if we just excrete the excess vitamin, or if there are more serious side effects, and is this a problem to do with basing tests off 25-(OH) vitamin-D levels.
Blacks genetically have low levels of the binding protein for that form of Vitamin-D.
The two articles below give two different perspectives on the issue.
Does vitamin D testing misdiagnose African-Americans? | Vitamin D Council
(He cites a study that vitamin D was much higher in the Massai, but they are heavy milk drinkers with the same type of vitamin D as whites)
Vitamin D
Anyway, that my view on it for now.
And I appreciate how you been civil with your responses, btw.
Good discussion helps everybody learn.
