What's wrong with having many sexual partners?

[old_timer]

Yes.
Make that thread.

c'mon, people in here are talking about "sexual soul ties" and making car analogies
they don't want to hear about IgA assays
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15217036
they don't want to hear about the medical consequences of low IgA
they're too locked into their echo chamber, pulling make-believe stats out of their ass, and turbo-posting their agenda 1000 times/month so any dissenting posts dismantling their bullshyt get drowned out
i'd be summarizing the 7th of 184 journal citations, hit submit, and see some fool with a smiley remix clowning me already has 63 daps

 

[flipstacks]

You'll never be happy.

 

[Blackout]

c'mon, people in here are talking about "sexual soul ties" and making car analogies
they don't want to hear about IgA assays

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15217036
they don't want to hear about the medical consequences of low IgA
they're too locked into their echo chamber, pulling make-believe stats out of their ass, and turbo-posting their agenda 1000 times/month so any dissenting posts dismantling their bullshyt get drowned out
i'd be summarizing the 7th of 184 journal citations, hit submit, and see some fool with a smiley remix clowning me already has 63 daps

You can have a lot of sex with one person.

 

[old_timer]

You can have a lot of sex with one person.

how would you quantity the benefits and risks of that lifestyle??

http://psr.sagepub.com/content/17/2/124
the authors examined the alleged benefits of monogamy and reached a different conclusion
there are over 100 citations so it is pretty dense
but so far i haven't seen a rebuttal published
if it's so open and shut, maybe some coli posters can tackle that chore during a lunch break

i'm saying-
abstinence has risks and benefits
promiscuity has risks and benefits
monogamy has risks and benefits

each has to be quantified and considered
it's 2015- this "promiscuous people catch yucky stds" shyt doesn't cut it anymore

and not to disagree with my right hono(u)rable friend colicat
but statements like having multiple partners "diminish your spirit and suck the soul out of you" are completely meaningless unless we examine the diminished spirits and soul-sucking experienced by other lifestyles

 

[Blackout]

how would you quantity the benefits and risks of that lifestyle??

http://psr.sagepub.com/content/17/2/124
the authors examined the alleged benefits of monogamy and reached a different conclusion
there are over 100 citations so it is pretty dense
but so far i haven't seen a rebuttal published
if it's so open and shut, maybe some coli posters can tackle that chore during a lunch break

i'm saying-
abstinence has risks and benefits
promiscuity has risks and benefits
monogamy has risks and benefits

each has to be quantified and considered
it's 2015- this "promiscuous people catch yucky stds" shyt doesn't cut it anymore

and not to disagree with my right hono(u)rable friend colicat
but statements like having multiple partners "diminish your spirit and suck the soul out of you" are completely meaningless unless we examine the diminished spirits and soul-sucking experienced by other lifestyles

Id call the benefit of not getting an STD that will stay with you for the rest of your life very beneficial lol.

You have sex with one or three woman unprotected is less of a risk than having sex with a lot unprotected.

Just because something has risks that doesnt mean that we should make it even more riskier lol.

Its like your telling me that crossing the road everyday is risky so crossing it blindfolded everyday as long as your walking in a straight line isnt so bad because there are risks everywhere.

 

[SirReginald]

Not a damn thing

 

[King Poetic]

 

[mamba]

Looks like a Brady Bunch spoof of underdeveloped minds.

 

[filial_piety]

hmm...from wha tI've seen, people with "too many" partners tend to be fuked up mentally.

 

[Mr.Forte]

I know one thing

My kids won't be HALF HOE

I love LADIES

Who RESPECT their MIND, BODY and SOUL

 

[Londilon]

As a man I dont subscribe to what some nikkas think that women have to stay chase while men can fukk anything at anytime. Both are hoes if they have a large body count. The problem is that women do not understand that this world is ran by men. So unfair standards will stay until things are equal between for both men and women and I dont see that happening anytime soon.

 

[philmonroe]

i never saw any problem with having lots of sexual partners
it's not like i am in danger of running out of body fluids

people use the risk of std as a reason
but that never seemed like a good explanation
there are also risks of NOT having sex
maybe someone should do a publicity campaign about that??
same with risk of knowing people, reputation, etc.
as an example??
it is like saying "walking across the street is risky"
yeah, welp, sitting inside an apartment has risks of its own (radon, mold, etc.)
you can't just pretend those inside risks don't exist

Potentially getting something that could change you life and way of living isn't a good reason to consider not taking as many risk? nikka must've just started getting p*ssy. Now admittedly people don't pay attention until that happens but acting like that isn't a good reason on maybe toning it down is crazy. Also even if people aren't haven't sex vast majority are having sex so outside a few cats relative of course people are having "sex". Also I like what @7Revo said regarding your walking the streets stuff.

hey...this is how society is constructed.

at the end of the day WHO GIVE A shyt about how other people are perceived.

If you find it disgusting for men to sleep around, then go for a dude who doesnt sleep around.
If you find it disgusting for women to sleep around, then do not sleep around.
If you want to sleep around, go ahead just dont complain years later when dudes aint trying to wife
If you want to get with a man who sleeps around, go ahead, just dont complain when he leaves you to sleep with a next chick.

What is the point of this thread. You are not going to kill any double standards with it.

Exactly but they don't really want to kill double standards they just want to kill the ones that don't benefit them. Where are all the chicks starting post on not paying for a date, stepping to a dude, us being stay at home dads(if that's what you wanted), them being the breadwinners, etc? Until people are willing to let go of their benefits do be so quick to speak on me giving up mine.

Men approach women in the way society is currently set up. It takes more for a man to bed multiple women than the other way around. And also, women admire qualities that can be found in men that can bed multiple women such as charisma, social skills, and a general air of confidence. Meanwhile, men value women that possess virginal-like qualities and are viewed as prizes. You want to keep the system in place in which women are considered the prize and are pursued? Then deal with the double standards that come from that.


No matter how much people dislike the facts, as long as the current model of dating exists in the West, the double standards will exist. Women seemingly want to have as much sex as possible, be excused from slut shaming, refuse to pursue men, and still want to be courted and treated as prizes. One end cannot exist without the other.

I agree with all of this but esp bold. When chicks want to get up off the things that benefit them then we can talk but until then its nothing to talk about.

Interesting perspective, but none of the reasons given in this thread for dislike of promiscuity tie into this. I'm also glad that someone is admitting that there are double standards that they like.

You benefit and like double standards too so stop fronting unless you are saying you pay for every date, court guys, etc.

Don't see a problem if you're smart about it .

I had a co worker tell me she was seeing four guys but unsure which one out of the four to keep. The dates with all of them went well but she just wants to date one of them exclusively, not be in a relationship (hearing this a lot from females lately)



I told her to give them all a "test drive" to figure it out. I gave her the analogy of her being at the car lot and test driving four cars to see which one she'll lease for a while. When the leasing agreement is up, she can upgrade to buy or trade it in for a new one She literally gave me the when I told her that. No different from us guys.



Ever since I've stopped giving a fukk and giving these broads at my job the honest truth about dating and what I know they really want out of it, they all of a sudden wanna talk to me more about it


I have a decorated sexual past but I looked out for myself doing so . Who am I to judge about a woman's sexual past as long as it's not broadcasted and she wasn't reckless about it?

They ain't fukking you breh you want props for being their emotional talk toy? Smdh

Women don't want men with a lot of partners though. That's especially true for women with "virginal-like qualities". Men confuse men having qualities that women like which allows them to sleep with their share of women, with women liking men who sleep with a lot of women. Women will take Idris Elba with 3 partners over Idris Elba the hoe 100% of the time.

And I don't think your double standard explanation is accurate. If it was, men who didn't fulfill their end of the deal wouldn't be applauded. For instance, men who don't court nor treat women like a prize are exalted as 'alphas' by men. The truth is the double standard doesn't exist as some way to benefit men and women mutually at all, its entirely for men and its allowed because this is a sexist society.

Another person only worried about what guys are doing. So as I asked the other chick you paying for dates, courting dudes, etc that chicks don't do as often on avg. Is that how you do things the majority of the time? If not neat talking like chicks have nothing that's a double standard.

Because as natural as people want to try and make it out to seem it isn't. Add to that the risk of running into STD and pregnancy's even with all kind of protection used, its just not whats suppose to go down.


Whats natural is to do what feels good, and sex feels good. It's natural to want what you like, and people you find attractive you want sex is the ultimate acquisition (or tagging) of a person for men and for women is the ultimate form of submission. Women don't like to think of it like that, but everything about sex is for a women is generally in the submissive realm, even those that like to dominate in the bed room when it comes down to it and time for the act, you are still getting f*kked no matter how you are working it.

Its natural to have one person and want to be with that one person only... Its also natural to fin other people attractive while in that relationship. So having a bunch of sexual partners is going to get old at some point, very old and it will leave a man feeling incomplete and a women soulless and used up

I agree with the whole post but def bold. If it didn't get old most people wouldn't settle down IMO. They would just keep dating and fukking randoms.

 

[old_timer]

Id call the benefit of not getting an STD that will stay with you for the rest of your life very beneficial lol.

You have sex with one or three woman unprotected is less of a risk than having sex with a lot unprotected.

Just because something has risks that doesnt mean that we should make it even more riskier lol.

Its like your telling me that crossing the road everyday is risky so crossing it blindfolded everyday as long as your walking in a straight line isnt so bad because there are risks everywhere.

you quote me twice
i write a reply, give you a link with some information, then 3 minutes later you've already replied with a twist on a point i've previously dealt with
the article is 18 pages- seriously, like you didn't even skim it??
that's your choice
but since you're too busy to assess my answers
why would i respond again??
good luck

 

[iBrowse]

I think it's gross. & I think that people with more sex partners will be more likely to cheat and there will be no emotional connection during sex because they are so used to having sex with any/everything without it.

This. And I'm sick of hearing women use the "men do it too" excuse. Not all of us are about that life.

 

[Blackout]

you quote me twice
i write a reply, give you a link with some information, then 3 minutes later you've already replied with a twist on a point i've previously dealt with
the article is 18 pages- seriously, like you didn't even skim it??
that's your choice
but since you're too busy to assess my answers
why would i respond again??
good luck

I am advocating sex with a low amount of partners to decrease the risk of catching an std.

So it looks like you read that whole thing.

Good then that means you can answer this question with a summarized response based on your link:

I am simply gonna ask you what risk from having low sexual partners and going the monogamy route is worse than the increased risk of getting an std by having sex with more than lets say 5 sexual partners?

Summarize from the info in the link if you have to if that will answer that question plz.