Who created God?

[tuckgod]

I understood everything you said, i understand it even more clearly than you do.

Obviously you didn’t.

 

[Methodical]

Check this out, whether or not God has always existed or something created God, both beliefs lead to the same conclusion...eternity. If God-1 was created by God-2, then God-2 must've been created by God-3, and so on and so forth. If you're looking for the creator of the creator, than that creator must also have a creator. Let's be real, if something created God the next question would be what created that. It's never ending thus eternity.

God has always existed, because there is no beginning.

Exactly!

 

[levitate]

The fairytale is believing in gravity

The fairytale is believing in evolution

When there’s evidence for something belief doesn’t matter.

 

[Box Factory]

Liars

 

[God Almighty]

I'll tell y'all the truth if you can get my rep in the green.

 

[TL15]

It’s such a good semantics question and really shows each persons willingness to commit to their beliefs

The answer is the same though on both sides: nothing.

nothing created God as God has always existed (believer)

All the universe comes from nothing (non believer)

none of us will ever be able to answer this question so spend your life enjoying it

 

[AVXL]

“Before Me there was no God formed, nor shall there be after Me.”’-Isaiah 43:10

 

[xCivicx]

This is not facts this is occultism. This is Satanism, like he told you it is new age and esoteric spiritualism the roots of which are the demonic and the satanic, and him saying 'as above, so below' should have made that obvious to anyone who spent even an hour going down that rabbit hole. It is not facts it is a demonic lie.

But what else would i expect, you know nothing of what you speak, as long as it sounds good and is compatible with the type of lifestyle you would like to live

Nah occultism is a b*stardized from of ancient African spiritual practices, I know the difference

Occultists don't recognize a Creator, their god is "knowledge"

 

[xCivicx]

When there’s evidence for something belief doesn’t matter.

Which of those THEORIES do you have evidence proving them?

 

[levitate]

Which of those THEORIES do you have evidence proving them?

Uhh...let’s start with gravity.

Drop your phone...???

 

[xCivicx]

Uhh...let’s start with gravity.

Drop your phone...???

Again, that's not gravity

My phone is more dense than the air around it so it's potential energy above the ground turns to kinetic energy as is released and it falls through the air, then that kinetic energy reaches 0 as it hits the ground and comes to rest

If gravity were an actual real phenomenon then anything in a large body of water would also sink to the bottom of that large body of water, but humans, boats, trash etc floats in large bodies of water, because the density of the water is greater than the density of the the previously mentioned humans, boats and trash

 

[BXKingPin82]

I farted on my girls thigh

 

[levitate]

Again, that's not gravity

My phone is more dense than the air around it so it's potential energy above the ground turns to kinetic energy as is released and it falls through the air, then that kinetic energy reaches 0 as it hits the ground and comes to rest

If gravity were an actual real phenomenon then anything in a large body of water would also sink to the bottom of that large body of water, but humans, boats, trash etc floats in large bodies of water, because the density of the water is greater than the density of the the previously mentioned humans, boats and trash

breh, go look up the term buoyancy, study it, understand it, and get back to me later.

Don’t have time today...

 

[xCivicx]

breh, go look up the term buoyancy, study it, understand it, and get back to me later.

Don’t have time today...

Why would you assume that I don't know what "buoyancy" is??

I minored in physics at GT

Buoyancy is a function of density

Buoyancy (/ˈbɔɪənsi, ˈbuːjənsi/)[1][2] or upthrust, is an upward force exerted by a fluid that opposes the weight of an immersed object. In a column of fluid, pressure increases with depth as a result of the weight of the overlying fluid. Thus the pressure at the bottom of a column of fluid is greater than at the top of the column. Similarly, the pressure at the bottom of an object submerged in a fluid is greater than at the top of the object. The pressure difference results in a net upward force on the object. The magnitude of the force is proportional to the pressure difference, and (as explained by Archimedes' principle) is equivalent to the weight of the fluid that would otherwise occupy the volume of the object, i.e. the displaced fluid.

For this reason, an object whose average density is greater than that of the fluid in which it is submerged tends to sink. If the object is less dense than the liquid, the force can keep the object afloat. This can occur only in a non-inertial reference frame, which either has a gravitational field or is accelerating due to a force other than gravity defining a "downward" direction.[3]

You essentially believe that water is an anti-gravity device, which doesn't make any sense at all

Gravity supposedly keeps multi-ton vehicles on the ground, yet water is supposedly powerful enough to offset that force on a multi-ton object, even though according to the theory of gravity, the more mass something has, the more it pulls and is pulled on.

Again, that doesn't make any sense

 

[levitate]

You essentially believe that water is an anti-gravity device, which doesn't make any sense at all

Gravity supposedly keeps multi-ton vehicles on the ground, yet water is supposedly powerful enough to offset that force on a multi-ton object, even though according to the theory of gravity, the more mass something has, the more it pulls and is pulled on.

Again, that doesn't make any sense

You don’t seem to understand that local forces can overcome gravity. Gravity isn’t some all-encompassing insurmountable force... Hell, using your same logic my 20# dumbbell that I have on the floor should just tear through my bedroom floor because the dumbbell is more dense than the carpet and wood supporting it.
In your physics classes did you not take a simple statics lesson?