Diondon
Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
Bron stans getting desperate
This Laker run looking like a disaster
This Laker run looking like a disaster
Who is closer to GOAT status? Mahomes to Brady or MJ to Lebron
- Thread starter cobra
- Start date
Since when did quarterbacks start beating other quarterbacks? What are doing up here? Dudes claim to hate ESPN and the media pundits who create stupid scenarios, but here we are. This is a stupid topic on so many levels. 
ARE YOU INSINUATING ELI MANNINGIS AN ELITE QB?
Lucky_Lefty
Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Keep fishing for shyt that ain’t there or stated
IS AN ELITE QB?
DOES MAHOMES HAVE A LOSING RECORD IN THE SB?
thread
NAH IT WAS A SERIOUS QUESTION
CONSIDERING YOU TYPED ALL
OF THOSE NAMES
BUT OMITTED HIM FROM YOUR POST.
fifth column
Superstar
Mike is the standard so it’s Bron that has to make a compelling case
Lebron is “your goat” that’s it. MJ is the standard so it’s up to the next “MJ” to make a case vs him. Nobody looking for the next Bron breh
murksiderock
Superstar
My position on the Jordan thing is clear and straight to the point: he's the only other guy with a legit case as GOAT...He failed constantly and only won rings because he formed a superteam.
But my analysis of GOAT has a large onus on what you do when everything isn't going your way. The years Mike won the title he had the best roster in basketball. He was supposed to win it all---->and he did so in dominant fashion...
But Mike had years he didn't have the best roster, or best GM, or best coach, or Scottie Pippen, and in those years he never, not even once, elevated his team to contention...
This matters and for the life of me I'll never understand why this is ignored for Mike, because it certainly isn't ignored for the modern superstar...
You're not the GOAT if you need the best everything to win titles. The best coach, the best GM, the best #2, the best roster, a historically weak era. This was the environment Mike won his rings in...
Imagine saying that a guy who led a Finals run at age 22/Y4 with role players and G-Leaguers;
a guy who again led a Finals run with role players and G-Leaguers at age 33/Y15;
a guy who won 3 chips in a 5 year stretch;
a guy who won 4 chips in a 9-year stretch;
a guy who won 4 MVPs in 5 years;
A guy who went to 8 straight NBA Finals in a row;
a guy who went to 9 Finals in 10 years;
a guy who went to 10 Finals in a 14-year stretch, same 14-year stretch playing in the conference finals 11 times;
A guy who took 5 different coaches to The Finals, won 3 of them rings;
A guy who won championships for 3 different franchises and won championships in both conferences;
A guy who is #1 in EVERY metric correlated to winning and dominance thru a 21 year career;
a guy who did all of this in a prime that overlapped with everyone from Duncan and Kobe and Shaq and Dirk and Garnett to Curry and Durant and Kawhi and Giannis and Jokic, somehow with ALL these big names having moments in a 21-year stretch this guy is still #1 in EVERYTHING we use to measure greatness......
Imagine calling a player with this resume a "failure"
You guys are nuts. The only 1-man dynasty in the history of pro basketball, who accomplished all this without a Phil Jackson, accomplished it with different variants of Scottie Pippen, accomplished this stiff without a Scottie Pippen, accomplished this stuff without the consistently greatest roster, accomplished this stuff in a stacked era, and then you add on he was a better peak defender than Mike, substantially greater passer than Mike, the greatest transition scorer in league history, his biggest performances are arguably greater than Mike's biggest performances, not a greater natural scorer than Mike and yet has a list of explosive scoring performances in the postseason that may be second to ONLY Mike...
Michael Jordan was not a better basketball player than the player I just described above...
Imagine calling anyone with the resume a listed above a "loser" or "forced" media creation...
Mike is your standard. And sure, he's the standard to Bron and players of his age range, Bron was born in '84...
Mike isn't the standard to me and we have a list of current players from Giannis on down who quote Bron as their standard, and he's clearly the standard the current crop of stars are compared against. No one is looking for The "next" Bron but people are compared to him because he set the bar. That 90s Jordan run may as well have been what you Mike nikkas consider Russell's 60s Celtics run, far as I'm concerned. Mike wasn't doing that shyt in the 80s, when he was LeBron's current age he didn't look anything near as good as Bron looks now, I just have a list of basketball reasons against Mike as GOAT...
You nikkas have mythology. Congratulations...
fifth column
Superstar
So if we switched Mike’s and Bron’s resumes then your are saying with your chest that Mike would be the goat with a 4-6 finals record, 4 fmvps, 4 MVPs forming super teams over Lebron with a perfect 6-0 finals, 6 fmvps, leading a dynasty with 2 3-peats, 5 MVPs in less time and only 1 other all star in Scottie Pippen?My position on the Jordan thing is clear and straight to the point: he's the only other guy with a legit case as GOAT...
But my analysis of GOAT has a large onus on what you do when everything isn't going your way. The years Mike won the title he had the best roster in basketball. He was supposed to win it all---->and he did so in dominant fashion...
But Mike had years he didn't have the best roster, or best GM, or best coach, or Scottie Pippen, and in those years he never, not even once, elevated his team to contention...
This matters and for the life of me I'll never understand why this is ignored for Mike, because it certainly isn't ignored for the modern superstar...
You're not the GOAT if you need the best everything to win titles. The best coach, the best GM, the best #2, the best roster, a historically weak era. This was the environment Mike won his rings in...
Imagine saying that a guy who led a Finals run at age 22/Y4 with role players and G-Leaguers;
a guy who again led a Finals run with role players and G-Leaguers at age 33/Y15;
a guy who won 3 chips in a 5 year stretch;
a guy who won 4 chips in a 9-year stretch;
a guy who won 4 MVPs in 5 years;
A guy who went to 8 straight NBA Finals in a row;
a guy who went to 9 Finals in 10 years;
a guy who went to 10 Finals in a 14-year stretch, same 14-year stretch playing in the conference finals 11 times;
A guy who took 5 different coaches to The Finals, won 3 of them rings;
A guy who won championships for 3 different franchises and won championships in both conferences;
A guy who is #1 in EVERY metric correlated to winning and dominance thru a 21 year career;
a guy who did all of this in a prime that overlapped with everyone from Duncan and Kobe and Shaq and Dirk and Garnett to Curry and Durant and Kawhi and Giannis and Jokic, somehow with ALL these big names having moments in a 21-year stretch this guy is still #1 in EVERYTHING we use to measure greatness......
Imagine calling a player with this resume a "failure"
You guys are nuts. The only 1-man dynasty in the history of pro basketball, who accomplished all this without a Phil Jackson, accomplished it with different variants of Scottie Pippen, accomplished this stiff without a Scottie Pippen, accomplished this stuff without the consistently greatest roster, accomplished this stuff in a stacked era, and then you add on he was a better peak defender than Mike, substantially greater passer than Mike, the greatest transition scorer in league history, his biggest performances are arguably greater than Mike's biggest performances, not a greater natural scorer than Mike and yet has a list of explosive scoring performances in the postseason that may be second to ONLY Mike...
Michael Jordan was not a better basketball player than the player I just described above...
Imagine calling anyone with the resume a listed above a "loser" or "forced" media creation...
Mike is your standard. And sure, he's the standard to Bron and players of his age range, Bron was born in '84...
Mike isn't the standard to me and we have a list of current players from Giannis on down who quote Bron as their standard, and he's clearly the standard the current crop of stars are compared against. No one is looking for The "next" Bron but people are compared to him because he set the bar. That 90s Jordan run may as well have been what you Mike nikkas consider Russell's 60s Celtics run, far as I'm concerned. Mike wasn't doing that shyt in the 80s, when he was LeBron's current age he didn't look anything near as good as Bron looks now, I just have a list of basketball reasons against Mike as GOAT...
You nikkas have mythology. Congratulations...
It appears you didn’t just drink the kool aid, you drank the whole bowl
Greenhornet
A God Among Kings
lebron still chasing kobe
High quality poster
Veteran
You wrote a whole bunch of nothing. Mike won it the years he was suppose to win it so he ain’t goat? Lol wut? Your case makes no sense. Lebron has had a superteam every damn years minus 2007. What are you saying?My position on the Jordan thing is clear and straight to the point: he's the only other guy with a legit case as GOAT...
But my analysis of GOAT has a large onus on what you do when everything isn't going your way. The years Mike won the title he had the best roster in basketball. He was supposed to win it all---->and he did so in dominant fashion...
But Mike had years he didn't have the best roster, or best GM, or best coach, or Scottie Pippen, and in those years he never, not even once, elevated his team to contention...
This matters and for the life of me I'll never understand why this is ignored for Mike, because it certainly isn't ignored for the modern superstar...
You're not the GOAT if you need the best everything to win titles. The best coach, the best GM, the best #2, the best roster, a historically weak era. This was the environment Mike won his rings in...
Imagine saying that a guy who led a Finals run at age 22/Y4 with role players and G-Leaguers;
a guy who again led a Finals run with role players and G-Leaguers at age 33/Y15;
a guy who won 3 chips in a 5 year stretch;
a guy who won 4 chips in a 9-year stretch;
a guy who won 4 MVPs in 5 years;
A guy who went to 8 straight NBA Finals in a row;
a guy who went to 9 Finals in 10 years;
a guy who went to 10 Finals in a 14-year stretch, same 14-year stretch playing in the conference finals 11 times;
A guy who took 5 different coaches to The Finals, won 3 of them rings;
A guy who won championships for 3 different franchises and won championships in both conferences;
A guy who is #1 in EVERY metric correlated to winning and dominance thru a 21 year career;
a guy who did all of this in a prime that overlapped with everyone from Duncan and Kobe and Shaq and Dirk and Garnett to Curry and Durant and Kawhi and Giannis and Jokic, somehow with ALL these big names having moments in a 21-year stretch this guy is still #1 in EVERYTHING we use to measure greatness......
Imagine calling a player with this resume a "failure"
You guys are nuts. The only 1-man dynasty in the history of pro basketball, who accomplished all this without a Phil Jackson, accomplished it with different variants of Scottie Pippen, accomplished this stiff without a Scottie Pippen, accomplished this stuff without the consistently greatest roster, accomplished this stuff in a stacked era, and then you add on he was a better peak defender than Mike, substantially greater passer than Mike, the greatest transition scorer in league history, his biggest performances are arguably greater than Mike's biggest performances, not a greater natural scorer than Mike and yet has a list of explosive scoring performances in the postseason that may be second to ONLY Mike...
Michael Jordan was not a better basketball player than the player I just described above...
Imagine calling anyone with the resume a listed above a "loser" or "forced" media creation...
Mike is your standard. And sure, he's the standard to Bron and players of his age range, Bron was born in '84...
Mike isn't the standard to me and we have a list of current players from Giannis on down who quote Bron as their standard, and he's clearly the standard the current crop of stars are compared against. No one is looking for The "next" Bron but people are compared to him because he set the bar. That 90s Jordan run may as well have been what you Mike nikkas consider Russell's 60s Celtics run, far as I'm concerned. Mike wasn't doing that shyt in the 80s, when he was LeBron's current age he didn't look anything near as good as Bron looks now, I just have a list of basketball reasons against Mike as GOAT...
You nikkas have mythology. Congratulations...
Somehow clowns turned this thread into anti lebron which was the motive behind it from the beginning, anyone who doesnt agree with their lebron hate or believe mahomes is even close to brady at this point is a stan. just pathetic and a so called clown as a mod is the one propping it up
