Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Horry was trash in 2001.


He was still a better all-around player than McKie.
Horry was trash in 2001.
So McKie is a better player? Don't p*ssyfoot around the question
Stop with the revisionist bullshyt.He played 20 minutes a game.
![]()
He was still a better all-around player than McKie.
You are too stupid to be in here. Could you at least name Robinson. Jesus. Robinson with Allen and Sam.. that's actually better team than most of the east this season. Yes, the conference was weak. The east has been trash for over a decade yet we are going to hold it against AI and nobody else?
Plus, speaking of the trash East. You would think T-Mac would have gotten Orlando out the first round one of those years....![]()
What does that have to do with 2001?Okay, he had seasons where he averaged 6-7, close to 8 rebounds a game off the bench, he is also in the top 100 all time in defensive win shares.
Anything else?
Clowns![]()
What does that have to do with 2001?
Tracy was a better scorer, defender, rebounder, shooter and passing is debatable.
Horry didn't log many minutes in 2000-01 but if you are going to tell me McKie was a better all-around player... just exit the thread.
stick to football.
Horry was not better. 2001 was one of Horry's worst years as a Laker.He said "name a player that was better than McKie coming off the bench during this time"
![]()
Horry was not better. 2001 was one of Horry's worst years as a Laker.
yeah and the year before he was 4th in defensive rating. So what's your point?