Why Do I Gotta Pay For Something You Gave Away For Free?

Dre Space Age

...
Supporter
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
18,375
Reputation
2,414
Daps
35,491
If a woman is having sex with men who has never spent money or time on them outside of sex, why should another man put in work, pay for dates, put in time and effort for something another man got for free? :mjpls:
i agree. once you know a nicca got it for free, its a wrap

but hey... Get married brehs
 

Astroslik

Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
29,748
Reputation
3,086
Daps
88,644
This the key word ...men have a Scarcity MENTALITY. Men have to stop this all together. Men should be holding try out the cavs . If your secretary just up and leaves your company you to go back to the human resource department and look at applications. You as a man can't let your company fail.
This is why you need a roster

Diverse your portfolio so if one stock fails it won't sink you
 

⠝⠕⠏⠑

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
21,950
Reputation
26,530
Daps
116,811
I'm looking at it from evolutionary standpoint, in the fact that a woman who births children from the most genetically superior man willing to f**k her and THEN finds a man (simp) willing to help her take care of the children, is in the ideal situation. That's hitting the evolutionary jackpot and women are programmed to do so.

You don't have to pair bond with the man that gives you children, but you do have sleep with him. Yes, they have the desire for him to be their lifelong partner, but what's more important is that they have his seeds, and they will not even risk him being turned off by suggesting that they want more.

In today's society most women on a social level do not want to have children OOW, but their biology doesn't give a sh*t about that and there's still that impulse to let a top tier dude have their way with her.
But now we're comparing apples and oranges b/c we're not talking about top tier men and women. We're talking average people who think they can get away with what top tier dudes and chicks are doing. But even then the evolutionary standpoint isn't to fukk the best and get what they can get to raise it. It's to fukk and pairbond with the best period. That why you get chicks trying to trap at all stages. If they were okay or just fukking was beneficial then they wouldn't demonize men for only wanting sex. Sure some will settle on what they can get but it's still not benefiting them and thus the stigma on dudes who just wants to fukk remains...and sensibly so unless she on some different shyt. Lol!
I honestly don't think women necessarily hate men for it so much as it just doesn't fulfill the same needs. And yeah sometimes women do just want a nut:lolbron:but usually women don't view the orgasm itself as the valued experience, it's the interaction with the male and so the man who just wants a nut is a waste of time---unless his personal value is so high that it's worth valuing orgasms with him based on the possibility of pair-bonding with the best. I think there was a study somewhere that women enjoy sex more with rich men or something like that...lmao!
Evolutionarily a woman surrounded by stable alpha males to fukk/pair bond with is :lawd:. But evolution outside of reproduction also dictated that diversity is necessary so a wide variety of shyt became important in pair bonding.

But I digress. An average dude coming only with his nuts in his hands ain't gonna be looked upon favorably by most. Just like an average chick with super standards isn't taken seriously lol!
 

⠝⠕⠏⠑

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
21,950
Reputation
26,530
Daps
116,811
He's not :skip: he styled his shyt that way...I had to figure that out too
Lol! But still tho. Some bans I get but I rarely wanna see anybody banned. I'll talk to a rock even if it doesn't agree with me, as long as we can respectfully talk about shyt. (Sometimes I be disagreeing with people I actually agree with just to expand on ideas and shyt @Larry Lambo lol!)

Most people have a logic to what they are expressing even if I don't agree with it. It's still interesting to understand their perspectives. Reggie if ur reading this, sorry u got banned...(unless u was trolling elsewhere u sly dog you! Lol!)
I'm also sensitive to people feeling frustrated or misunderstood...so banning em just exacerbates that problem.
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
49,294
Reputation
1,127
Daps
140,197
Also welfare state has nothing to do with lames not getting booty. The "lames" themselves are just as unreasonable in their standards as the women are.
You have some very strange ideas about the way relationships work. None of this is based in reality.

Welfare isn't keeping women from choosing the men you want them to choose anymore than it's keeping men from choosing the right women.


I salute you for being the only woman on here willing to engage in a honest dialogue with brehs on here:salute:
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
12,988
Reputation
2,378
Daps
31,362
But now we're comparing apples and oranges b/c we're not talking about top tier men and women. We're talking average people who think they can get away with what top tier dudes and chicks are doing. But even then the evolutionary standpoint isn't to fukk the best and get what they can get to raise it. It's to fukk and pairbond with the best period. That why you get chicks trying to trap at all stages. If they were okay or just fukking was beneficial then they wouldn't demonize men for only wanting sex. Sure some will settle on what they can get but it's still not benefiting them and thus the stigma on dudes who just wants to fukk remains...and sensibly so unless she on some different shyt. Lol!
I honestly don't think women necessarily hate men for it so much as it just doesn't fulfill the same needs. And yeah sometimes women do just want a nut:lolbron:but usually women don't view the orgasm itself as the valued experience, it's the interaction with the male and so the man who just wants a nut is a waste of time---unless his personal value is so high that it's worth valuing orgasms with him based on the possibility of pair-bonding with the best. I think there was a study somewhere that women enjoy sex more with rich men or something like that...lmao!
Evolutionarily a woman surrounded by stable alpha males to fukk/pair bond with is :lawd:. But evolution outside of reproduction also dictated that diversity is necessary so a wide variety of shyt became important in pair bonding.

But I digress. An average dude coming only with his nuts in his hands ain't gonna be looked upon favorably by most. Just like an average chick with super standards isn't taken seriously lol!
Also welfare state has nothing to do with lames not getting booty. The "lames" themselves are just as unreasonable in their standards as the women are.
You have some very strange ideas about the way relationships work. None of this is based in reality.

Welfare isn't keeping women from choosing the men you want them to choose anymore than it's keeping men from choosing the right women.



Just like those black "educated lames" will get with the white girl or another race that held them down in college and build with him. Those women took a chance on a man's potential and later it paid off. It not too many black women that I know that want to trust the process. Lames don't have unrealistic perspectives trust I've been on a ton of college campuses and jobs.
 

⠝⠕⠏⠑

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
21,950
Reputation
26,530
Daps
116,811
Just like those black "educated lames" will get with the white girl or another race that held them down in college and build with him. Those women took a chance on a man's potential and later it paid off. It not too many black women that I know that want to trust the process. Lames don't have unrealistic perspectives trust I've been on a ton of college campuses and jobs.
They do. I see it every day and they aren't with whites that "held them down", they wanted them from the jump. These dudes either want dyme blk chicks or the next best thing in their minds which is white or non-blks.
They were never checking for most chicks like them anyway but will use that as a trope to justify their choices.
This fantasy is the standard blk female/male c00ning fairy tale.

"They never liked me in k-12 b/c I was a different special blk snowflake in a community of blks who only like rap music. (Actually it just meant that I took Asian cartoons too seriously when other people grew out of them.) So I worked hard and became an amazing catch and a white prince/princess came and appreciated me (showed me attention as their token and used my bashing of my own race as validation for their insecurities after I crawled thru glass for their affection.) and held me down when the evil black Jezebel/Buck rejected me. Ha! Take that blk dymes that didn't want me (even tho didn't want anybody else like me either). See?! Look at me with my non-blk mate. Now the world knows I'm worthy of affection."

You forget. All of us went to high school. I could tell exactly who was going to date a non-blk growing up. Why is that? Because they were marked by this resentment of feeling they weren't being worshipped enuff by their own race. That went inward and manifested itself as a preemptive rejection of their own race. It's clockwork.
 

⠝⠕⠏⠑

Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
21,950
Reputation
26,530
Daps
116,811
I salute you for being the only woman on here willing to engage in a honest dialogue with brehs on here:salute:
I have to unlock this woundology.
I have to show these men AND women that relationships are difficult but not impossible. However a heavy dose of accountability on both sides is needed. It isn't just female mate selection that's the issue.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
12,988
Reputation
2,378
Daps
31,362
They do. I see it every day and they aren't with whites that "held them down", they wanted them from the jump. These dudes either want dyme blk chicks or the next best thing in their minds which is white or non-blks.
They were never checking for most chicks like them anyway but will use that as a trope to justify their choices.
This fantasy is the standard blk female/male c00ning fairy tale.

"They never liked me in k-12 b/c I was a different special blk snowflake in a community of blks who only like rap music. (Actually it just meant that I took Asian cartoons too seriously when other people grew out of them.) So I worked hard and became an amazing catch and a white prince/princess came and appreciated me (showed me attention as their token and used my bashing of my own race as validation for their insecurities after I crawled thru glass for their affection.) and held me down when the evil black Jezebel/Buck rejected me. Ha! Take that blk dymes that didn't want me (even tho didn't want anybody else like me either). See?! Look at me with my non-blk mate. Now the world knows I'm worthy of affection."

You forget. All of us went to high school. I could tell exactly who was going to date a non-blk growing up. Why is that? Because they were marked by this resentment of feeling they weren't being worshipped enuff by their own race. That went inward and manifested itself as a preemptive rejection of their own race. It's clockwork.


Not true I know LAWRENCE'S in real life this a prespective thing as well. I know black people who swirl or go after white girls and I really could get deep on the white washing of America but not right now. I know guys that date nothing but white girl and yeah they have that aura or what not but like I said I know a lot of Lawrence's and trust they don't like anime outside of Afro samurai and DBZ. I know a lot of boss bytches like moly to thoe ...lol And can't keep a man for shyt. See the reason why nikka liked the ending of the show insecure is because the "Good Guy" wasn't suppose to win the good guy IS always suppose to lose. It the stoic alpha that gets all the chicks or the female prototype is at that time.
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
41,823
Reputation
2,597
Daps
104,557
I'm looking at it from evolutionary standpoint, in the fact that a woman who births children from the most genetically superior man willing to f**k her and THEN finds a man (simp) willing to help her take care of the children, is in the ideal situation. That's hitting the evolutionary jackpot and women are programmed to do so.

You don't have to pair bond with the man that gives you children, but you do have sleep with him. Yes, they have the desire for him to be their lifelong partner, but what's more important is that they have his seeds, and they will not even risk him being turned off by suggesting that they want more.

In today's society most women on a social level do not want to have children OOW, but their biology doesn't give a sh*t about that and there's still that impulse to let a top tier dude have their way with her.
It's not evolutionary. women going to simps after having babies by the men they really wanted is an act of desperation. And it breeds dysfunction and broken homes.. which create broken children.

If society continues down this road, fukkery, depression, and mental illness is gonna become the norm.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
12,988
Reputation
2,378
Daps
31,362
It's not evolutionary. women going to simps after having babies by the men they really wanted is an act of desperation. And it breeds dysfunction and broken homes.. which create broken children.

If society continues down this road, fukkery, depression, and mental illness is gonna become the norm.


....you mean is the NORM bro .
 
Top