In economic development in college, my professor said poor people tend to have lower expectations for their children. I agree with that.





The family dynamics were different back then. You didn't have people waiting to have kids like they do now. People were getting married at 18. People are more career driven now than ever before. There were also far, far fewer single parent households than than there are now.
yall are unbelievable with your faux elitism. now all poor are just low iq savages that dont know any better ?
how about they just want to have a fukking kid and carry on their name/genes to another generation ?![]()
i think we need to make a rule that if you're on government assistance, you receive no additional assistance after three children. you can have the kids, but you gotta make do with the money you're given and earn, and the gov only recognizes your needs up to 3 kids if you want free moneyIf him and his partner make 30k each (assuming they are together) that is a decent amount to live on and raise a child, that being said as irresponsible as it may seem sometimes we can't put an income limit on procreation, because I can assure you there's people poorer than that doing more with less.
what do you think of what i said above. fair enough?yall are unbelievable with your faux elitism. now all poor are just low iq savages that dont know any better ?
how about they just want to have a fukking kid and carry on their name/genes to another generation ?![]()


kids were very useful and productive back in the days. Helped on the farm or in businesses.Why were they having so many children before these institutions existed?
people who can't afford children should be more concerned with improving their financial and educational status than worrying about their genes being passed along.