This is how you earned your WOAT² banner. We didn't forgetWhat do you mean by "rigging?"
It sounds like you don't understand what the parties are.
The PARTIES select their own candidates. No one forced to accept the 2 party system.
This is how you earned your WOAT² banner. We didn't forgetWhat do you mean by "rigging?"
It sounds like you don't understand what the parties are.
The PARTIES select their own candidates. No one forced to accept the 2 party system.
I'm willing to accept that some leaders are willing to twist some arms to get shyt done...
Yall gotta leave those comic books behind and join the ranks of power or learn how to change shyt without bytching aimlessly
Cmon son...sure they are. The reality is this. if hil is in office not much will change. thats a FACT. so not much will change for the people who want to vote for bernie.
what will happen if bernie wins is this. i've said this before. its not just about what HE can do. he can only do so much until congress has to do something also.
But if he's constantly pushing his views and everyone knows the only reason they are not getting thru is due to congress(repubs speficially). the people will start to realize, wait a second. maybe its time to change course. other politicians that think like bernie that would've never had a shot otherwise all of a sudden has a real shot to take some seats. because the people need to know its possible to put someone in office that isnt taking a bunch of money from the big boy corps and wall street. The people need to see it happen to realize its a real possibility. once that happens, other politicians will start to win with a similar take on politics as bern. If you keep refusing this reality and using the excuse "he wont get those things done..its not realistic." then nothing will ever change. so unless you like things how they currently are. You voting for status quo is worse than not voting at all.
Are niccas forgetting Candidate Obama and all the promises he made before the republicans came through and tossed them into the bushes? Is President Obama the status quo now? I would think it would be smart to build upon what Obama has already accomplished as Hillary wants to do and vote for her, and not govern from the Far left like Bernie is trying to do. What do you mean by "status quo" breh? You're using generalities because you and I know you don't want to get into specifics....because you don't know any.I know you two are OK with the status quo, but real change takes time. Nothing is overnight.
What is the status quo? Is Obama the status Quo?I know you two are OK with the status quo, but real change takes time. Nothing is overnight.

English. Speak it.How you changing the world when you a puppet of the person pulling the strings?!!?Cmon son...
same shyt I asked himWhat is the status quo? Is Obama the status Quo?![]()

You didn't say shyt.My words... CAN you read it...![]()
What do you mean by "status quo" breh? You're using generalities because you and I know you don't want to get into specifics....because you don't know any.
I have TONS of problems with the way things are, but you don't understand how power works or how to leverage your own interests in useful ways. Thus, you stick to empty platitudes.
What is the status quo? Is Obama the status Quo?![]()
Answer the question though. Are you accusing Obama of being the status quo? Because if Hillary is the status quo than Obama definitely had to be the status quo.Playing dumb, I see. :smhkobe:
What else should I have expected from two Hillary supporters? She's the most self serving candidate in the entire field including Trump and you're pleading ignorance on the status quo? :smhkobe:
You didn't say shyt.
Ya'll are the same ones mad that a successful woman makes money from other rich motherfukkers in a country that created the system.
You all will never be satisfied.
I'm not mad Hillary gave speeches for money. I don't give a fukk. I really don't.
Did she break the law with her emails though? Absolutely.

Now I'm mad she's a successful woman.... 






The parties select th e candidate in the general election. Am I talking about the general election or the primaries? When I ask you why there are only 2 democratic members as viable candidates, is that in reference to the general election or the primaries.What do you mean by "rigging?"
It sounds like you don't understand what the parties are.
The PARTIES select their own candidates. No one forced to accept the 2 party system.
This whole message is why Black people never get shyt. Cape for corruption, and KNOW it's happening, but it's okay, because Dems are doing it. Meanwhile, Hil ain't ssaid shyt about police brutality, and they're so resentful that Obama got Blacks in charge first, they're gonna do the same thing Obama did to you and sing some Negro spirituals to you, while pushing you outta the White liberal woman's way progression-wise.You didn't say shyt.
Ya'll are the same ones mad that a successful woman makes money from other rich motherfukkers in a country that created the system.
You all will never be satisfied.
I'm not mad Hillary gave speeches for money. I don't give a fukk. I really don't.
Did she break the law with her emails though? Absolutely.