Why is stone cold steve austin above rock?

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
121,767
Reputation
8,216
Daps
143,777
Reppin
Westcoast
Do you think WWF would actually beat WCW if rock went there tho?

Austin vs rock?
The Rock wouldn't have went for the political nonsense of Nash and Bischoff. Just his temperament, personality, and desire was more serious than how they conducted business.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
53,190
Reputation
8,398
Daps
162,444
Rock would've never became who he was without Austin.

1. Austin SAVED the company, Rock would've never had time/freedom to develop into who he became b/c the company was headed out of business.

2. Austin was the star the Rock needed to compete against to become a huge star himself.

Austin was Austin with/without the Rock....but the Rock eventually took him higher. But Rock wouldn't have initially been The Rock without Austin.
 

Gangstar8

All Star
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
8,754
Reputation
-7,688
Daps
12,251
Rock would've never became who he was without Austin.

1. Austin SAVED the company, Rock would've never had time/freedom to develop into who he became b/c the company was headed out of business.

2. Austin was the star the Rock needed to compete against to become a huge star himself.

i dobut thats true

Rock would be a star with or without austin
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
121,767
Reputation
8,216
Daps
143,777
Reppin
Westcoast
Rock never was the guy while Austin was there. Austin was always higher on the pecking order
If you watched the WWF IN 2000, Austin was definitely behind the Rock when he came back. Rock wrestled more on Raw and Smackdown..his return match put the WCW TITLE over Austin after shooting the movie.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
121,767
Reputation
8,216
Daps
143,777
Reppin
Westcoast
Rock would've never became who he was without Austin.

1. Austin SAVED the company, Rock would've never had time/freedom to develop into who he became b/c the company was headed out of business.

2. Austin was the star the Rock needed to compete against to become a huge star himself.

Austin was Austin with/without the Rock....but the Rock eventually took him higher. But Rock wouldn't have initially been The Rock without Austin.


The Austin/Tyson angle flipped the mainstream press away from the Nwo

Steve Austin had nothing to do with the Rock becoming a draw in 98. I have no idea where u got that notion. The fans created the Rock phenom...they really wanted him to lose for a long time before marking out at Summerslam.

Austin/Rock is the highest drawing main event feud ever.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
53,190
Reputation
8,398
Daps
162,444
i dobut thats true

Rock would be a star with or without austin

Austin being the top star gave Rock a chance to grow as a character.

Vince needed a top babyface and wanted to make blue chipper -Rock a face. But it wasn't working. Austin being on top gave Rock time grow into a character and eventual #1 contender.

Again, the company might not have lasted much longer if there was no Austin.
 

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,803
Reputation
20,850
Daps
300,269
Reppin
Maryland
TBH HHH better than both:sas2:

Michael-Scott-Closes-The-Door-Awkwardly-On-The-Office.gif
 
Top