Yung Knickas Wildin|Draft Picks Stylin|Grimes n Mcbride Got Bball God's Smilin NYK Discussion Thread

RickyGQ

No nikkas!
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,600
Reputation
2,709
Daps
64,839
Reppin
NJ
The only things they share are that they were super raw players that were drafted with development in mind and that they were obviously flawed on one end of the floor but had requisite skills that were NBA ready on the other side of the floor...and they were both among the three youngest players in their draft classes.

But they're basically polar opposites besides that. Knox has huge offensive upside that you want to unlock and defensive holes that you just want to bring up to competent. Frank has clear defensive upside (anyone arguing against this is reaching point blank) and offensive flaws that you just need to bring up to competent for him to become a valuable contributor.

I always wonder if the patience vs impatience with prospect thing relates to whether people got into basketball before or after the one and done rule got implemented. I've got nothing to go off on that, but I feel like prior to that rule you'd get a lot more super raw prospects drafted that took time to become finished products. Trevor Ariza being the first name that comes to mind.

And then the organization threw development out of the window.
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
17,731
Reputation
5,907
Daps
67,332
Reppin
NYC
Most teams would have traded both Frank and Knox a long time ago. Every young player that struggles isn't a late bloomer than turns into Steve Nash at 29. They said Trier was supposed to be the next Jamal Crawford but he cant even find a team.

I think the problem is that this conversation always turns into a binary between being out of the league in a year versus becoming a Steve Nash type star. There's a huge grey area in between where a player can be productive and valuable.
 

Geordi

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2018
Messages
3,029
Reputation
767
Daps
14,529
I think the problem is that this conversation always turns into a binary between being out of the league in a year versus becoming a Steve Nash type star. There's a huge grey area in between where a player can be productive and valuable.
I'm all into developing the guys that show promise Mitch, Obi, RJ. How often do the fringe NBA players like Dotson, Trier, Kornet turn into a valuable piece on another team? Frank and Knox are still on the team so we may as well give them some playing time and see what happens but I'm not losing sleep over their lack of minutes.
 

NY's #1 Draft Pick

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,851
Reputation
6,680
Daps
100,788
Reppin
305
I'm all into developing the guys that show promise Mitch, Obi, RJ. How often do the fringe NBA players like Dotson, Trier, Kornet turn into a valuable piece on another team? Frank and Knox are still on the team so we may as well give them some playing time and see what happens but I'm not losing sleep over their lack of minutes.

did you have another username before?
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
17,731
Reputation
5,907
Daps
67,332
Reppin
NYC
I'm all into developing the guys that show promise Mitch, Obi, RJ. How often do the fringe NBA players like Dotson, Trier, Kornet turn into a valuable piece on another team? Frank and Knox are still on the team so we may as well give them some playing time and see what happens but I'm not losing sleep over their lack of minutes.


I think promising is tough to define. Both Frank and Knox had interest from other teams in the league this offseason. That's not because they're sure things, but a few GM's see promise at a minimum. Frank's defensive chops and Knox's shooting ability + size make both kids worth some attention and development. That's especially true on a team that's projected to be worst in the league anyway.

Both Knox and Frank are younger right now than Dot, Trier and Kornet were as rookies. For sure, they need to show more than they have to stick around, but I wouldn't shut the door on them or compare them to those guys. They have better tools which is what got them drafted so young in the first place.

Just to add in, the only way I'm losing sleep over minutes is if a player earns them but isn't rewarded. Frank was the clear cut best PG in the preseason last year from a competition with DSJ and Payton involved. Allonzo Trier opened the season as starter. That sorta thing would make me pull my hair out but I don't think we have to worry about that type of thing with Thibs. I'm more concerned that he'll overplay vets than lack a coherent plan.
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
17,731
Reputation
5,907
Daps
67,332
Reppin
NYC


I'll say it straight out. If you tell me we can have Buddy Hield and be slightly better non-playoff team or we can have a shot at a top five pick in this draft class; I'm taking the lottery, new busted odds and all. I don't even have to think hard about it. Get these kids playing hard and learning defense for a season; hope to land a Cunningham or a Green or a Suggs or a Mobley; get yourself some Buddy Hield caliber players in Free Agency next season.
 

JerseyFinest!

All Star
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,672
Reputation
301
Daps
4,635
Reppin
Trenton, New Jerz
The only things they share are that they were super raw players that were drafted with development in mind and that they were obviously flawed on one end of the floor but had requisite skills that were NBA ready on the other side of the floor...and they were both among the three youngest players in their draft classes.

But they're basically polar opposites besides that. Knox has huge offensive upside that you want to unlock and defensive holes that you just want to bring up to competent. Frank has clear defensive upside (anyone arguing against this is reaching point blank) and offensive flaws that you just need to bring up to competent for him to become a valuable contributor.

I always wonder if the patience vs impatience with prospect thing relates to whether people got into basketball before or after the one and done rule got implemented. I've got nothing to go off on that, but I feel like prior to that rule you'd get a lot more super raw prospects drafted that took time to become finished products. Trevor Ariza being the first name that comes to mind.

Word!

I think for the older Knicks fans who are the same way, it’s the Mike Sweetney/Jordan Hill etc Trauma from having high draft picks that basically were bust for us....So now when a lottery pick doesn’t come out with a bang, the patience level isn’t there.

Frank and Knox were labeled projects...Those other picks were College made players who were expected to come in and contribute right away.

Knox and Frank are going to be good. Consistency is needed for young players. That’s THEE thing the Knicks have lacked.

At one point they literally tried to play Frank at SF

They had Moe Harkless playing over Knox

:mindblown: Who does these things to their project Lottery picks
 

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,731
Reputation
2,592
Daps
54,476
Reppin
NULL
i remember a time when ppl thought willy hermagomez was untradeable and our center of the future:mjlol:

sometimes you gotta cut your losses

last chance for knox, dennis smith, and frank. not askin you be world beaters, but its time to make significant progress and its time to play with consistent energy.

no more fukkin excuses
 
Last edited:

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
30,554
Reputation
6,700
Daps
116,909
Reppin
New York City
i remember a time when ppl thought willy hermagomez was untradeable and our center of the future:mjlol:

sometimes you gotta cut your losses

last chance for knox, dennis smith, and frank. not askin you be world beaters, but its time tomake significant progress and its time to play with consistent energy.

no more fukkin excuses

That’s the fairest way to look at it. Thibs is a good coach, there are actual development coaches for them. I don’t expect miracle but there should be some clear signs of inprovement.
 
Top