Pharell's Blurred Lines Deposition [LEAKED]...EDIT: More parts added #ImNotComfortable

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,152
Daps
641,744
Reppin
The Deep State
103ss5c.png
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
40,589
Reputation
3,808
Daps
111,050
Cause you are admitting what you created is a derivative work based off an existing work. Now if you don't plan on crediting the owner of the work who directly inspired your work that's fine. People get away with it all the time cause that's normally hard to prove unless your a dummy like Robin Thicke giving interviews stating the exact artist and song you used.
They said they were inspired by the record. The estate has to prove which part of blurred lines takes directly from got to give it up. You cannot even prove it. The judge gave a BS verdict and is trying to block an appeal knowing it BS. Show me undisputed evidence.
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
7,360
Reputation
2,078
Daps
32,330
Reppin
NULL
They said they were inspired by the record. The estate has to prove which part of blurred lines takes directly from got to give it up. You cannot even prove it. The judge gave a BS verdict and is trying to block an appeal knowing it BS. Show me undisputed evidence.
There is nothing left to prove. The case is over. Pharell and thicke lost. get over it.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,845
Daps
43,547
Maybe he didn't want to get into it about notes and stuff because the lawyer was setting up a trap. Not like he was asking these questions just for the hell of it, they were lead up questions to something else. Pharrell avoided answering questions about notes/structure of blurred lines and simiarities with got to give it up, so he just answered I'm not comfortable.

The only nikka in the thread who gets it :clap: Anybody remember "What is the meaning of is?" :russ:
 

scuba

All Star
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
1,374
Reputation
410
Daps
3,095
Cause you are admitting what you created is a derivative work based off an existing work. Now if you don't plan on crediting the owner of the work who directly inspired your work that's fine. People get away with it all the time cause that's normally hard to prove unless your a dummy like Robin Thicke giving interviews stating the exact artist and song you used.

this is the thing though... there is absolutely NOTHING legally wrong with making derivative works. Thats why this case was a shocker, not because it was ever in doubt that marvin gaye was the inspiration behind this record... the shocker was that they won a case without any legal violation of anything... its still amazing hope the precedent doesnt stick
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
40,589
Reputation
3,808
Daps
111,050
There is nothing left to prove. The case is over. Pharell and thicke lost. get over it.
They're going to appeal so it isn't over. The judge tried to block the block the appeal because it was a shady ruling. Like you and others, no one can actually point out anything b/w both records to prove an infringement.
 

Gaara

Pro
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
777
Reputation
-260
Daps
1,558
this is the thing though... there is absolutely NOTHING legally wrong with making derivative works. Thats why this case was a shocker, not because it was ever in doubt that marvin gaye was the inspiration behind this record... the shocker was that they won a case without any legal violation of anything... its still amazing hope the precedent doesnt stick


Still Hasn't Been Sued
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,152
Daps
641,744
Reppin
The Deep State
this is the thing though... there is absolutely NOTHING legally wrong with making derivative works. Thats why this case was a shocker, not because it was ever in doubt that marvin gaye was the inspiration behind this record... the shocker was that they won a case without any legal violation of anything... its still amazing hope the precedent doesnt stick
they copped to mimicking the song though. Thats the point

I can't see a jury just ignoring that...especially after Robin and Pharrell's testimonies...

 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,658
Reputation
-11,870
Daps
157,477
Reppin
Inches
the bluntness and disrespect of this reply :laff:
I respect Marv, but I doubt he was really making music outside of singing. Just like James Brown. JB couldn't read music like that, but I bet he got production credits too.
 
Top