amount of points scored per 100 possessions based on him being on the floor
This might be 1000% percent true...
But compared to Lowry
I'm gonna just leave this here:
Jason Kidd vs. Kyle Lowry Comparison
I know but theyre comparing Kidd to Lowry. Click the link and you would see that even if all of what you said is true about Kidd, there is no real comparison
And the funny thing through this all is, I didn't like Lowry at all either (I wouldn't ever consider myself a fan of his now), in fact I thought he was a bum, albeit a legit defensive player who could playmake, but a bum nonetheless. My perception of him changed drastically as he fine-tuned his offensive game over the last 2-3 seasons and turned into one of the better PGs in the league. He went from being an inefficent, low-end scorer to a highly efficient high-end scorer, improving his scoring skillset in almost every notable area tenfold, and proved it over an extended period of time that it wasn't just a fluke.
The fact you linked that makes me want to vomit.This might be 1000% percent true...
But compared to Lowry
I'm gonna just leave this here:
Jason Kidd vs. Kyle Lowry Comparison
Breh watches every single NBA game past 20 years
Not true at all, especially since Kidd had the ball in his hands more than any other player on his team when he was the offensive anchor. If you're the offensive anchor, of course you're a detriment to your team's offense if you aren't a reliable/efficient scorer. It's the equivalent of having a defensive anchor and you know they can't protect the rim.......
It should...The fact you linked that makes me want to vomit.
It depends on what site you're getting the indvidual ORTG from - different sites have different formulas that estimate/calculate different things. That aside, how could you possibly think that Kidd had a good offensive rating everywhere he went. Have you seen his #s?amount of points scored per 100 possessions based on him being on the floor
that suppose to be rocket science?
your providing " TEAM RANK" which definitely puts him in the shadow...i rather look at when he is on the floor only
when the numbers are zoom in while he is impacting the game only.
It makes me want to vomit because the whole argument is going over your head, and you think it's a comparison of vague career achievements.It should...
Even though he didn't have a USG rate similar to Kobe or Iverson, he still had the ball in his hand the most out of all his teammates. How is that a good thing when he offered nothing on offense besides passing?
Not true at all, especially since Kidd had the ball in his hands more than any other player on his team when he was the offensive anchor. If you're the offensive anchor, of course you're a detriment to your team's offense if you aren't a reliable/efficient scorer. It's the equivalent of having a defensive anchor and you know they can't protect the rim.......
pretty simple.. if your ORTG is above your DRTG then your doing good O is how many point is scored while your on the floor.. D is how many is allowed.. that simple..It depends on what site you're getting the indvidual ORTG from - different sites have different formulas that estimate/calculate different things. That aside, how could you possibly think that Kidd had a good offensive rating everywhere he went. Have you seen his #s?
