5G towers are being set on fire because of corona conspiracies

[Mr Hate Coffee]

So based on their logic, the developing countries have lower number of cases because they had less people exposed to 5G(due to less or no 5G towers), unless they got exposed to people who traveled to developing countries to cough out their viral toxins?

Just guessing at the logic.

How much 5G do you think Italy has?

 

[thekingsmen]

Talking about pets experiencing symptons

Answer @bnew graph where as cellular subscriptions goes up, cancer rates have remained stable, until then save your alarmist bullshyt for your "5G is the devil" buddies

You haven't been paying attention as no one has cited "Just cancer" stats. You also ignored World Bank as a source of info on cellphones..really?

I'm not surprised you think 5G is just about cellphones and cancer.

 

[Zero]

good. this will help slow the spread of coronavirus conspiracy theories

Rep worthy

 

[Threnody]

5G isn't even needed....like at all

 

[Phitz]

How much 5G do you think Italy has?

the logic goes like this

Italy gets ALOT of tourists and visitors from China, if the visitors are exposed to radiation in China and their body starts shedding virus based on the rise radiation caused by the change in electromagnetic frequency, the body is not gonna stop shedding virus once they leave China. Think of the virus like fleas that jump from dog to dog, instead human to human.

Again this is the logic/science, I'm not saying I believe it or saying it's true.

 

[null]

If you want truly autonomous vehicles then they need to be able to communicate with each other. How else will they avoid each other/drive in the most optimal way? This is why I think autonomous vehicles is 15 years away at earliest. The "infrastructure + majority of the vehicles on the road being autonomous" combo is not happening anytime soon.

They don't need 5G to talk to each other.

Routing itself we already have. That's text (non visual encoded data) and we already have that. You don't need 5G speeds for that.

Traffic routing is an algorithmically difficult problem not a network capacity problem and we already know how to route well enough.

Is your question how do two vehicles avoid colliding with each other? The answer to that is: not over the Internet.

Believe that the way to avoid an impending collision is to ask questions over a non-guaranteed medium of communication brehs.

That would be like phoning someone to get advice on how to dodge a bullet.

As an aside collision avoidance is far more likely to be agreed in advance i.e. model A adopts public plan 1 model B adopts public plan 2 then both A and B can predict (to some degree) what the other car will do.

The real answer to all of this waffling is video. 5G allows for real-time video communication and you don't need that to let cars drive themselves.

 

[thekingsmen]

They don't need 5G to talk to each other.

Routing itself we already have. That's text (non visual encoded data) and we already have that. You don't need 5G speeds for that.

Traffic routing is an algorithmically difficult problem not a network capacity problem and we already know how to route well enough.

Is your question how do two vehicles avoid colliding with each other? The answer to that is: not over the Internet.

Believe that the way to avoid an impending collision is to ask questions over a non-guaranteed medium of communication brehs.

That would be like phoning someone to get advice on how to dodge a bullet.

As an aside collision avoidance is far more likely to be agreed in advance i.e. model A adopts public plan 1 model B adopts public plan 2 then both A and B can predict (to some degree) what the other car will do.

The real answer to all of this waffling is video. 5G allows for real-time video communication and you don't need that to let cars drive themselves.

I appreciate you contributing to this thread like person with a brain and was dropping knowledgeable info and your thoughts.

 

[yyy]

This is silly, 5G's coming whether you like it or not. 5G in the 20s, 6G in the 30s, 7G in the 40s. The notion that human progress is going to stop is insane.

 

[---]

trust huwaei brehs

Going like any other company has better moral more standards stop with American narratives.

 

[HiphopRelated]

They don't need 5G to talk to each other.

Routing itself we already have. That's text (non visual encoded data) and we already have that. You don't need 5G speeds for that.

Traffic routing is an algorithmically difficult problem not a network capacity problem and we already know how to route well enough.

Is your question how do two vehicles avoid colliding with each other? The answer to that is: not over the Internet.

Believe that the way to avoid an impending collision is to ask questions over a non-guaranteed medium of communication brehs.

That would be like phoning someone to get advice on how to dodge a bullet.

As an aside collision avoidance is far more likely to be agreed in advance i.e. model A adopts public plan 1 model B adopts public plan 2 then both A and B can predict (to some degree) what the other car will do.

The real answer to all of this waffling is video. 5G allows for real-time video communication and you don't need that to let cars drive themselves.

real time routing, involving thousands of vehicles does require bandwidth. We're talking about vehicles where I can change my destination on a whim, and picking the best new route based on traffic, accidents, road works etc. You need real time data to apply those algorithms to with several other thousand people making new decisions.

And like I said, I don't like this argument because we're limiting ourselves to something that isn't available yet. I have no idea what people will come up with, I'm just stating ONE clear use case.

The internet was not viewed as a revolution by some in the early years that were IN tech.

 

[---]

This is silly, 5G's coming whether you like it or not. 5G in the 20s, 6G in the 30s, 7G in the 40s. The notion that human progress is going to stop is insane.

This, the internet of things is coming whether people like it not for that to work 5G needs to be a reality. None of the studies have shown a direct link to cancer. All that needs to be done is have better protocols for safety measures in order to mitigate the risk of potential side effects as 5g towers need to be closer together to work properly.

Anything new should always have better mitigation protocols that posses a risk to the general population.

 

[Floyd Pinkerton]

They’re being set on fire because 5G is a threat to the health of citizens. I know you idiots don’t like to read books and scientific articles so I’ll let y’all carry on

Man stop it.

 

[yyy]

This, the internet of things is coming whether people like it not for that to work 5G needs to be a reality. None of the studies have shown a direct link to cancer. All that needs to be done is have better protocols for safety measures in order to mitigate the risk of potential side effects as 5g towers need to be closer together to work properly.

Anything new should always have better mitigation protocols that posses a risk to the general population.

The cancer connection is silly. The impact of these waves can easily be measured on the radiation scale. If there were drastic increases in radiation we would already know. Radiation is all around us. Pretty sure getting an xray or a ct scan or an mri would expose you to more radiation than a 5G tower. This whole conversation is seeped in conspiracy theories. Companies work 10 years to create this technology to prevent things like this from happening in the first place. If any of this were true and there were real possibilities that 5G would cause cancer, what company would go ahead with implementation? That’s not something you can keep a secret and it is something that would bankrupt the company. People who burn down these towers should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

 

[Floyd Pinkerton]

*too

*ellipses need 3 periods

 

[altruicsense]

all jokes aside, requiring a 5G tower every 10 houses is stupid technology. 2020 and they can't come up with better tech?

Whoever erecting those towers is getting a hell of a paycheck.