Jesus christ niccas bringing rings into a discussion about running backs brehs?
You can't use rings in the rb argument.
as, Jim brown is the all time king of the whole actual sport.
The ring argument is only relevant in QB discussions and basketball.
In basketball, it is relevant because of the Celtics and the makeup of what that org stands for all the way around from locale to race.
So, the ring argument exists because the celt's won the most.
Plus, race integrated successfully with ship based results.
So, they have a talking point to deflect against racism.
Yet, we all know better and if you watched celt's basketball in the 80's you know what time it is.
As, the white privilege and narcissism is in full effect in that sport and its discussion because of boston's legacy.
In football, the ring argument exists for qb's.
All because full leadership is deflected upon the QB position.
That is narcissistically platooned in the subject of race.
So, in that argument is why the QB ring argument is given precedence over actual skill/talent/numbers, in media/grassroots consciousness.
Yet, devoid of that white narcissism in the football argument, Jim brown is still the king and in life.
As, Jim brown is the archetypical male.
you are aspiring to be and white people don't want you to know Jim brown.
Which is all narcissism, and deflection.
So, that white America does not have to deal with the possibilities of Jim brown being a standard influence in American culture.
Race is the reason America does not want you to know jim brown and jack Johnson were and are the top American males in American history.
That personified everything a white man wants to do or be viewed as.
It is all racism why the ring argument exists and imo,...
I am glad guys like mj actually defeated that ideaology.
To become another black man who is known as a firm marker in the legend of American excellence
Art Barr