Better player: Curry or Iverson?

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,937
Reputation
5,716
Daps
235,007
AI easily. Curry is now the most overrated player in the NBA. Dude has one lucky season and nikkas think he's better than an all-time legend.

Crakkkas please.
The man shot 49% from the field while making the most 3's in a single season in NBA history. You think that's luck?
 

LordTaskForce

All Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
3,242
Reputation
410
Daps
8,872
Reppin
Atlanta
I'm a Curry fan but Curry was non existing in the finals and would disappear all game until the end and his team still won.
Imagine if A.I. would have disappeared on his team the whole game until the end, they would have been blown out.

Curry would be a better fit if you had a team full of good to great players.
A.I. would be a better fit if you had no other talent on the team

I agree with this. Curry is a great shooter but Iverson was a better scorer.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,085
Reputation
6,422
Daps
170,780
If iverson could pass to someone like Klay Thompson do you honestly think he would shoot so much?

Iverson was a pure point guard. He shot so much because he had to.
iversonx-large.jpg
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
23,915
Reputation
4,289
Daps
101,193
All speculation. And if Barkley would've played on a stacked Suns team he would've won a title too :mjpls:

I'm only speaking on facts. At least iverson got to the finals. You can easily say of the Sixers played any other team than a lakers squad that swept the west they would've won the title as well. Just stop it yo. You regurgitation the same talking points.

A.I. got to the Finals, Nash & CP3 didn't. That is a fact. But let's not completely ignore context. Nash & CP3 played their entire careers in the West, A.I. was in his peak when the East was at it's absolute worst. The East during the early 2000's had a legitimate argument as the worst conference in pro sports history.
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
23,915
Reputation
4,289
Daps
101,193
I'm talking about the title. This topic woulda been laughable last year. Only reason nikkas are saying Curry now is cause of the lucky title run he had last year.

If Curry's title run was just a fluke then it's only right to say A.I.'s Finals run with Philly was a fluke too right?

I mean he played 10 seasons in Philly and that was the only year he won over 50 games, let alone got as far as the Finals. And that year was the only season of his career that he finished top 3 in MVP voting.

So it was obviously just an abnormal year right?
 
Top