Bill Burr is a real one. He called the Rittenhouse situation LAST YEAR

[EA]

The justice system is garbage

The fact that this kid can illegally cross state lines with guns that he wasn’t legally allowed to have access to, kill three people, claim self defence and people actually consider his point is hilarious

 

[ColdSlither]

People out here acting like 'I'm black, I do black things' is a proper deflection for parroting points that are not conducive to happy black existence.
Either there's internet anonymity allowing people to play their best digital blackface... or there's c00nery going on. Period. Acting like this case has fukk-all to do with black people in any positive sense is obtuse. There is nothing to be gained for us from this case going any way but him going to jail.

Anyone actually black knows this doesn't play out this way if Kyle doesn't shoot white people.
Anyone actually black knows this doesn't play out this way if Kyle isn't a white person.
Anyone actually black knows that, no matter how this plays out, the justice system we exist in wouldn't allow us to be in this situation and do these things and get even a tenth of the consideration given to this murderer. Period. Our fukking victims don't even get this level of consideration.

Anyone actually black knows that this trial is bullshyt and largely performative, and generally speaking is really just an indictment of the divergent justice systems in place that the whole fukking situation was about in the first place. Self-defense doesn't get to work like this for anyone but white boys who 'have their whole lives ahead of them'. Everyone else gets the circumstances of 'what were you doing to cause them to react like that' applied to them - black folk, brown folk, asian folk, women. But here we literally have the law coming in to protect this white boy from even being confronted with the fact that he has victims. Because that might make him feel like he did something wrong. And godforbid a white man gets his feelings hurt.

fukk this bullshyt.
fukk this case.
And fukk everyone trying to act like cheering on Kyle fukking Rittenhouse isn't being a c00n in all caps.
Point-blank period, argue with yo mama about it, I'm not hearing any counterpoints.

Justice for Ahmaud.

All of this... 100% agree.

 

[Marc Spector]

How you feel about this case basically comes down to whether you value capital over human lives, especially over the lives of your own countrymen, and we all know the answer to that n America.

 

[saturn7]

How is what I said wrong? You wanna call names? I couldn’t give any less of a fukk. You sound like a wannabe intellectual, but you sound like a clown.


None of what you’re spewing is the way things work in a court of law. The judge is setting the precedent at this trial. Everyone knows it. Everyone’s reporting it. To think that he’s not making his presence felt in this trial, makes you seem like a MAGA cac. In ANY other courtroom, white boy would be in cuffs, after being found guilty.. and he’d be awaiting a date for his sentencing.

Everything you said was wrong.
There was no "intent" proven that he came there to shoot. The fact that he was at the protest with a gun does not automatically mean he is guilty of murder. Did you hear the instructions to the jury? Did you hear the closing arguments.

The verdict will depend if the jury believes he had the right to self-defense at the time the shootings took place. Not because he was a cac with a gun in a place people feel he didn't belong.

 

[Trust Me]

Everything you said was wrong.
There was no "intent" proven that he came there to shoot. The fact that he was at the protest with a gun does not automatically mean he is guilty of murder. Did you hear the instructions to the jury? Did you hear the closing arguments.

The verdict will depend if the jury believes he had the right to self-defense at the time the shootings took place. Not because he was a cac with a gun in a place people feel he didn't belong.

The argument can be made that there was intent by simply showing UP to the protest, fully armed. From another state. For something that had nothing to do with him.

Matter of fact.. that would be the prosecutions strategy, and it would work in 95% of courtrooms across this country. The defense can try to throw all the shyt against the wall, in hopes of something sticking.. and thats fine. Some of the most successful lawyers in history take this approach. But at some point.. common sense rears its head in a courtroom.

But Im not holding my breath with this judge.

 

[ViShawn]

The argument can be made that there was intent by simply showing UP to the protest, fully armed. From another state. For something that had nothing to do with him.

Matter of fact.. that would be the prosecutions strategy, and it would work in 95% of courtrooms across this country. The defense can try to throw all the shyt against the wall, in hopes of something sticking.. and thats fine. Some of the most successful lawyers in history take this approach. But at some point.. common sense rears its head in a courtroom.

But Im not holding my breath with this judge.

Fully armed. As opposed to half armed?

 

[Cowboyz89]

Clearly this is not open and shut. Or else the jury would've announced a verdict yesterday.
If the jury believes he was legally defending himself at the time the shooting took place by law he is not guilty.
Again clouded by emotion.

I'm not defending dude. I'm just stating this is what the jury has to look at and make their decision on.
People adding extra shyt because they don't like him. I don't like him either but that doesn't change the fact that the jury is going to decide if he unlawfully shot those people.

Are you aware of how biased and corrupt the judge presiding over the case is?

 

[Trust Me]

Fully armed. As opposed to half armed?

The fact that that's all you got from my post, only tells me that you cant have a legit convo.

 

[Sterling Archer]

Everything you said was wrong.
There was no "intent" proven that he came there to shoot. The fact that he was at the protest with a gun does not automatically mean he is guilty of murder. Did you hear the instructions to the jury? Did you hear the closing arguments.

The verdict will depend if the jury believes he had the right to self-defense at the time the shootings took place. Not because he was a cac with a gun in a place people feel he didn't belong.

If he was anything other than white then this would be considered motive and a pattern of behavior consistent with intent. Now all of the sudden, social media posts arent relevant.

 

[saturn7]

Are you aware of how biased and corrupt the judge presiding over the case is?

The jury was still presented more than enough evidence to make a decision. The judge is irrelevant to me, as long as the jury got to hear and see all of the relevant evidence. The jury got to see multiple videos of the shootings, and got to hear witness testimony from those involved except the 2 deceased individuals.

They got to hear the prosecution's closing arguments and the closing statements from the defense.
It's all on them now.

 

[saturn7]

If he was anything other than white then this would be considered motive and a pattern of behavior consistent with intent. Now all of the sudden, social media posts arent relevant.

That had nothing to do with the night in question. He was there all night and didn't fire 1 shot until Rosenbaum chased him.

The jury will have to decide if the defendant was lawfully defending himself when the shootings took place. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

[Paper Boi]

we got Rottenhouse Sympathizers on here?

 

[Sterling Archer]

That had nothing to do with the night in question. He was there all night and didn't fire 1 shot until Rosenbaum chased him.

The jury will have to decide if the defendant was lawfully defending himself when the shootings took place. Nothing more, nothing less.

Just because you say it had nothing to do with it doesnt mean it has nothing to do with it. Its intent. It showed that even before he went there, he recorded himself saying he wished he could shoot people in this setting.
If I posted on IG that i wanted to kill you then a week later I drive across state lines to your home and I gun you down in the street, thats intent and I'd be charged and convicted as such.

 

[ViShawn]

The fact that that's all you got from my post, only tells me that you cant have a legit convo.

I get what you're saying but people talk about gun laws, etc. legality and are grossly misinformed or know nothing about the laws in place.

The 1st and 2nd Amendment allow us to protest how we want and assemble. Across the political spectrum. There have been BLM supporters out there like NFAC that perform armed protests. You're legally obligated to.

Myself an others have been asked by groups to go to annual marches in Tulsa, Oklahoma to commemorate the tragedy that was the Tusla Race Massacres. People protest for higher wages. People protest to vote, support or fight against wars. The fact that he came to a protest isn't anything new. He has family in Kenosha also he stated and that cane backed.

I'm not a protesting type nor am I going to endanger myself or loved ones over it. I've been in close proximity to some, more recent in Austin and I have footage of it.

I get it - just because you can doesn't mean you should. No question. If I was 17 I wouldn't be anywhere near that. That doesn't hold up legally in court though.

Just because you say it had nothing to do with it doesnt mean it has nothing to do with it. Its intent. It showed that even before he went there, he recorded himself saying he wished he could shoot people in this setting.
If I posted on IG that i wanted to kill you then a week later I drive across state lines to your home and I gun you down in the street, thats intent and I'd be charged and convicted as such.

Charge is one thing - conviction is another.

If you shoot in a self defense situation you are more than likely going to get charged with a murder. That's standard operating procedure. You may also get hit with civil law suits due to being liable for the death of that person, which I think that even if Kyle gets off he will have to face those.

This is something that is stressed in self-defense situations in legality. In some license to carry courses they talk about this.

 

[Ya' Cousin Cleon]

It's gun owners getting their panties in a bunch if anything.

we got Rottenhouse Sympathizers on here?