Charles Barkley - "The NBA is the worst it's ever been"

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,543
Reputation
-2,770
Daps
29,998
Reppin
Chi-town
There's bigs just as athletic as him in the league now with a half foot height advantage :manny:

And we're moving into a new era of great big men...hell 2 of the top 3 scorers in the league are big men :whoo:


Blake and a few other were as explosive.

Barkley at 36 without any lift anymore and with a bad back was 2nd in the NBA in rebounds per game but prime Barkley wouldn't be able to perform in today's league?:mjlol:
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,543
Reputation
-2,770
Daps
29,998
Reppin
Chi-town
So the only thing that defines an era is how many times a particular player gets knocked out before the Finals? And Lebron got pushed to 6 or 7 in a series before the Finals every year but 2011, and even that year Boston and Chicago both were real series.

Bill Russell, Jerry West, Magic, and Jordan all had stretches were they rep'd their conference about as often as Lebron has now.






Keep going back.

Celtics went 12 out of 13 years in the 50s/60s. Faced the Lakers 7 years out of 8, Hawks 3 out of 4, and Warriors the other two. Lakers had three straight trips again right after that too.

George Milan Lakers won 5 out of 6 years in the 40s/50s.





Starks as a star? 35-year-old Stockton? Going to the Finals with Barkley and KJ as your big two?

1990s had parity because it was the expansion era and teams were diluted as hell. Most contenders were a superstar, a sidekick, and a couple strong role players. Some of those teams had starters who'd have trouble making a roster today. How did Terry Teagle get a Finals start for the 1991 Lakers? Who filled out the frontcourt with Barkley on the 1993 Suns? Who started at center for the 1996 Sonics? How were the Bulls/Jazz in the 1998 Finals when their starting guards were a combined 135 years old?




Because he was a lazy player who feasted on being naturally athletic and either exploding past weak competition or doing a 10-15 second backdown into the post. . He was 1993 athletic, but that's nothing in 2016. You don't see 6'6" guys in the league today with the muscle definition of Samoa Joe. And his skill set was great for a forward of his time, but forwards like like Lebron/Anthony Davis/Durant/Giannis/Kawhi show so much more skill today. What of Barkley's skill set is 2016 elite? Plus he didn't try on defense whatsoever and never developed a shot.





Not an era that actually required you to develop your game.


"According to Williams, Allen Iverson wasn’t the only Sixer who hated practice, because Barkley was the laziest teammate he ever had.

He was always late to practice, and even came in eating McDonalds on numerous occasions. He would ride an exercise bike while watching teammates practice, screaming profanities at them.

Williams says he saw Barkley practice three times in the two years he played in Philadelphia."

U one some troll shyt if you're gonna use Giannis as a way to bring downplay barkley:mjlol:

There is a PG out there in Boston putting up 27ppg at a 5'7 PG but a 6'6 player who was a lot better wouldnt adapt:russ:

Barkley took a dump on Shawn Kemp when they went head to head and how many PFs in the league now are as athletic as 90's Kemp ? Hell, how many of them are better than Kemp for that matter
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,517
Reputation
166
Daps
6,159
Reppin
i wanna hunnid and fitty thousand!
Blake and a few other were as explosive.

Barkley at 36 without any lift anymore and with a bad back was 2nd in the NBA in rebounds per game but prime Barkley wouldn't be able to perform in today's league?:mjlol:
c00nley was nowhere near as athletic as young Blake :what:

Chuck would probably be a 3 in this era if anything

:mjlol:@ him Tryna guard AD or KP
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,543
Reputation
-2,770
Daps
29,998
Reppin
Chi-town
c00nley was nowhere near as athletic as young Blake :what:

Chuck would probably be a 3 in this era if anything

:mjlol:@ him Tryna guard AD or KP


Barkley and Draymond Green are the same height. :comeon:

Either a 4 or 3, Barkley would be doing damage out there even more so now than back then.
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,543
Reputation
-2,770
Daps
29,998
Reppin
Chi-town
Draymond get's away with being undersized because of his defense that c00nley never had

Not to menton Dray shoots better from 3 as a stretch 4

Draymond can't score like Barkley either nor rebound

U talking out of your ass thinking Barkley won't be effective in today's League
 
Last edited:

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
21,161
Reputation
5,577
Daps
90,841
Reppin
The Arsenal
the nba has always been like this in most of our lifetimes and will continue to be like this because it's just the nature of the game with a starting 5 and generational talents having the ability to impact wins/losses in a more significant way than other sports. it's also why in college it would be easier to make a small basketball school a national champion vs a small football school.
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
44,443
Reputation
-697
Daps
92,562
hurts is running 2 much and is sloppy with the football kiffin needs to run his backs not his qb
 

JackRoss

Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2015
Messages
35,451
Reputation
3,311
Daps
76,203
1980: Lakers/Sixers
'81: Celtics/Rockets
'82: Lakers/Sixers
'83: Lakers/Sixers
'84: Lakers/Celtics
'85: Lakers/Celtics
'86: Celtics/Rockets
'87: Lakers/Celtics
'88: Lakers/Pistons
'89: Lakers/Pistons

That's hella repetitive. Only five teams made it to the finals in the 80s.


Magic and that weak ass Western Conference :troll:
 
Top