his comparison to slavery is
but i think that point, minus that bullshyt, is valid. you can't say that people have a "right" to something as complicated, and expensive, and involves as many peoples services, as healthcare

you can argue that a country as rich as america SHOULD provide healthcare to all, without saying everyone has a 'right' to it. i dont think anyone does
it's different than some shyt like "the right to freedom", which doesn't actually require anything from anyone else, or "the right to free speech". you have the "right" to things that dont require anything from anyone else; the "right" means that no one else can
impede on them