yseJ
Empire strikes back
so if Niners and Seattle are rated last and second to last in passing offense then by your logic, passing the ball is coaching scared ?
Did Sean Peyton offer an explanation for that game plan Saturday?
- Thread starter CrimsonTider
- Start date
so if Niners and Seattle are rated last and second to last in passing offense then by your logic, passing the ball is coaching scared ?
lolwut
Points come from the passing game bruhso if Niners and Seattle are rated last and second to last in passing offense then by your logic, passing the ball is coaching scared ?
Do you know how hard it is to run a hurry up offense and huddle playing at Seattle? Did you not see the difficulties the Saints had just getting the play out for the huddle in time? It may not sound that hard to do until you are in there playing in these circumstances at Seattle. Plus the running game began to make the Seahawks honor the run game and opened up the passing game for the Saints.
They seemed to execute it just fine in the 4th qtr....I get it its loud there...but jesus the Seahawks arent invincible.
yseJ
Empire strikes back
exactly. just because youre not good at something, doesnt mean by utilizing that aspect of your offense against a weaker aspect of the defense is 'coaching scared'
the saints were advancing the football less by throwing the football than running the ball, in the first half. they were actually nearly doubling the yardage by rush vs the pass.
but then again, you probably think running the ball with a good qb is 'coaching scared'
why doesnt anyone say beli was 'coaching scared' by running the ball 3 times more than put it in his qb hands ?
The best thing about this thread, is that crimson thinks he's spitting knowledge like the overlysmart dumb nikka at the barbershop...
exactly. just because youre not good at something, doesnt mean by utilizing that aspect of your offense against a weaker aspect of the defense is 'coaching scared'
the saints were advancing the football less by throwing the football than running the ball, in the first half. they were actually nearly doubling the yardage by rush vs the pass.
but then again, you probably think running the ball with a good qb is 'coaching scared'
why doesnt anyone say beli was 'coaching scared' by running the ball 3 times more than put it in his qb hands ?
so much fail here
yseJ
Empire strikes back
What you're failing to realize is that there is ANOTHER fukkING TEAM THAT'S ON THE FIELD
You don't think they tried all this bullshyt you and these other fukktards are suggesting? Graham got locked the fukk up and they got beat by the better team, plain and simple.
why is this shyt 4 pages?
why doesnt anyone say beli was 'coaching scared' by running the ball 3 times more than put it in his qb hands ?
didnt you try to make a big deal about this yesterday?
malbaker86
Gators
I already got my nominee for worst poster of the year. Nobody will top this nikka
The Patriots ran the ball because they were winning the entire time and it was working.
Trip, lets set aside the argument yesj is making
Do you think the saints should have gameplanned (going into the game) to run a more pass heavy offense, vs the historically good seahawks defense in (what was forecasted to be) heavy downpour of rain? Do you believe that would have been more effective vs the seahawks?
yseJ
Empire strikes back
wheres the fail, phaggit ?
you idiot think running the ball is 'coaching scared'
theres nothing wrong with running the football. especially since it, over the course of season, is a key to winning against seahawks. its called adjusting.
but then youre the same guy who said pats run same 16 plays out of 1 formation
your idiot ass would abandon the run once down two scores
peyton had a decent plan, he just doesnt have the personnel to execute that plan. its like having a run/gun basketball team and you try to run a halfcourt offense for one game, it doesnt work.
you have to be physical on both lines, thats why the cardinals won in spite of their qb throwing 3-4 ints
you have to be physical on both lines, thats why the cardinals won in spite of their qb throwing 3-4 ints