Trip, lets set aside the argument yesj is making
Do you think the saints should have gameplanned (going into the game) to run a more pass heavy offense, vs the historically good seahawks defense in (what was forecasted to be) heavy downpour of rain? Do you believe that would have been more effective vs the seahawks?
Im saying once you go down 16-0 on the road this "gameplan" gets
into the bushes.


The saints offense is just not as good as the seahawks defense and theres no way in seattle they would've had a gameplan that could be executed to beat them.
Seahawks were pretty conservative down the stretch and played some prevent defense near the end of the game, which almost could have bit them in the end. Practically ever QB has shown signs of being rattled playing at Seattle since Wilson has been QB last season. There is a reason why nobody hardly throws it near Richard Sherman. Plus Earl Thomas & Kam Chancellor, they are scary as fukk for every QB in the league. Seattle are just on another level at home, and it helps cover the flaws on offense they have, which is that they don't have much weapons on offense. If anything, the Saints defense were able to contain Wilson and didn't let any WR go off on them, except Lynch, but he always kills the Saints so its nothing new.
And that emo canook @