Donald Trump: U.S. must "start thinking about" racial profiling
- Thread starter Saiyajin
- Start date
Ronnie Lott
#49erGang
MIKE SPLEAN
Superstar
This bytch dumb
@King Kreole @JudgeJoeGorilla
I don't know how anyone who has followed politics, or done even a modicum of research, think that Trump and Sanders are even close when it comes to war -- especially the war in Iraq.
Congress passed the Iraq resolution in October 2002. Months before, Trump was giving a radio interview where he, hesitantly, said he supported the war. Months later, in January and March, Trump still seems to have little reservations about going into Iraq, saying Bush either "needs to go in, or don't". He even says the war seemed to be a success from a military standpoint, and predicted the stock market to shoot up. What on Earth indicates this man, had he'd been a member of Congress, would have voted against it? He claims to have had this great foresight when it came to Iraq, but when it comes to what he actually said leading up to the war, he towed the line and supported the war. Trump, if he was against the war, was a little bytch and publicly supported it when it was safe, and publicly spoke against it when the war became unpopular. But it's hard to stand up in opposition of something the overwhelming majority of Americans support. It takes a man who has the courage of his convictions....
Which brings me to Mr. Bernard Sanders:
This is a video of him on the House floor days before the vote to invade Iraq was held. This wasn't 2004 or 2005 when we finally started realizing the quagmire we were in ... it was before Congress agreed to the invasion. His and Trump's position on Iraq around 2002 were clearly night and day. Sanders' isn't like "ehhh, I guess I'm okay with going to war". His position is a resounding No!
Trump has never held public office, so he doesn't have a record we can really critique as much as say a Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. But you people have got to stop fooling yourselves if you think Trump is anti-war, and would be immune to buckling to pressure from joint chiefs of staff, a secretary of defense, and other advisors.
I don't know how anyone who has followed politics, or done even a modicum of research, think that Trump and Sanders are even close when it comes to war -- especially the war in Iraq.
Congress passed the Iraq resolution in October 2002. Months before, Trump was giving a radio interview where he, hesitantly, said he supported the war. Months later, in January and March, Trump still seems to have little reservations about going into Iraq, saying Bush either "needs to go in, or don't". He even says the war seemed to be a success from a military standpoint, and predicted the stock market to shoot up. What on Earth indicates this man, had he'd been a member of Congress, would have voted against it? He claims to have had this great foresight when it came to Iraq, but when it comes to what he actually said leading up to the war, he towed the line and supported the war. Trump, if he was against the war, was a little bytch and publicly supported it when it was safe, and publicly spoke against it when the war became unpopular. But it's hard to stand up in opposition of something the overwhelming majority of Americans support. It takes a man who has the courage of his convictions....
Which brings me to Mr. Bernard Sanders:
This is a video of him on the House floor days before the vote to invade Iraq was held. This wasn't 2004 or 2005 when we finally started realizing the quagmire we were in ... it was before Congress agreed to the invasion. His and Trump's position on Iraq around 2002 were clearly night and day. Sanders' isn't like "ehhh, I guess I'm okay with going to war". His position is a resounding No!
Trump has never held public office, so he doesn't have a record we can really critique as much as say a Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. But you people have got to stop fooling yourselves if you think Trump is anti-war, and would be immune to buckling to pressure from joint chiefs of staff, a secretary of defense, and other advisors.
The American
Defending America against cacs
This forum remembers that better than anyone, that's why trill posters like 1984 burns their flag and most everyone here says fukk AMERIKKKA.
That's what I'm thinking. I bet they wished they kept their eye on homeboy at the gay club.
We live in a society where people do f'd up shyt but can't say it.
Even though I'm done with the Trump topic it's not about the world being simple. Before I start this off, I like BOTH the Israeli/Jews and Palestinian people. However, both should be separate and we need peace. BOTH are like cousin yes they have a relation. I want those Palestinian children to get a decent chance in life. It's a complex issue, but we need to have peace of some sort. There's Israeli's that want peace basically the left. However, with the right-wing in power it's legit hard. Also, Netanyahu isn't making the situation any better as Prime Minister. The Sephardi people used to be treated badly. Now, we have discrimination with the Ethiopian Jews over there. I want everyone to atleast have a chance in life. War in all occasions doesn't make a situation any better. It's nothing being p*ssy about.
P.S. look at the Mizrahi community over there. I've been subscribed to this guy for about a year now. He asks different communities questions in Israel and Palestine.
BTW, TWO EX- Israeli Defense Ministers have came out again Netanyahu attacking him. He's most definitely a problem.
Last edited:
So I guess we can start profiling white males, seeing how they've been responsible for the majority of domestic terrorism 
Did I miss something? Didn't the we always racially profile and don't we still do it now? I really think that Trump is low key retarded and I mean for real he's short bus slow.
Now the big question is how did this low IQ having b*stard get so well liked and well respected?
Now the big question is how did this low IQ having b*stard get so well liked and well respected?
Black Trump supporters are seriously dumb self hating c00ns that need to kill themselves.
I like the desert landcape better. It means i do t h ave to mow it o ce a week.
King Kreole
natural blondie like goku
1. I've never made a comparison between Trump and Sanders. I don't care which one of the two was more anti-war, because Bernie lost his primary. I'm judging Trump on his own merit.
2. Trump was a private citizen in 2002, so he wouldn't have been privy to the sort of information that a congressperson would have had. His statements on the war have to be analyzed through the lens of a private citizen. And remember, this was at a time when the war in Iraq had huge popular support.
3. Is this the smoking gun here? Because if so, that's the most tepid endorsement of a war i've ever heard. Saying an off the cuff "...yeah, I guess so" on Howard Stern a hawk does not make.
4. Trump's current anti-war stance has been fundamental to his campaign. It's an important part of his political ideology as an isolationist populist. Of course he'll have pressures in Washington to revert to the foreign policy status quo, but his political instinct isn't inclined towards war. Obama's administration has shown how important political instinct is, as he had to deal with the same pressures. Hillary pressured him to take military action in Libya, she pressured him to impose that idiotic red line in Syria, and then she tried to get him to take military action when Syria broke the red line. Hillary's instinct is hawkish. There's literally nothing to suggest Trump would be more hawkish than Hillary.
You added nothing to this topic. What you said had fukk all to do with Israel and Palestine. Now, move along Cody
Anyway, I'm just here for the comments continue
