godkiller
"We are the Fury"
If that QB isn't Paxton Lynch the Eagles lost.
If that QB isn't Paxton Lynch the Eagles lost.
what does gabbert have to do with anything, especially math ? and lol at building around a quarterback. you never learn do you ?
Why worry about the only player who plays every snap of the season. Fantastic strategy. The denial of the QB's impact on a football team is my favorite coli take. You can only get that here.
yseJ
Empire strikes back
player who plays every snap of the season ?
what are you even talking about ? offenses dont play every snap of game, obviously, and they don't even play every snap when they have the ball (because punts and field goals happen)even if its every snap on offense, plenty of linemen and #1 receivers log every snap on offense. shyt you say makes zero sense.
here's some math for you tho, I always got some math
22. thats amount of players on field every snap.
53. thats amount of players on active roster
155 million. thats cap for 2016
13. thats number of qbs who are getting on average 19m or more a year for 2006
0. number of teams that won the superbowl with a qb who made 20m a year to date. the guy who came closest is peyton (after restructuring his contract before last year), in his worst ever year being a starting qb
so why is a qb getting like an eighth of total cap if they're not influencing winning it all ? if theyre most important to winning games, how come teams still dont even make offs with some of these guys getting 20m?
[mos]It's a number game, but shyt don't add up somehow[/def]the numbers actually say its cheaper and more viable to assemble a great defense and build around them via trading down in draft and signing them for cheap, than to build around a qb who you'll pay an eighth of total cap. now more true than ever. but youre still fascinated by the drum...I mean qbs arm
player who plays every snap of the season ?
even if its every snap on offense, plenty of linemen and #1 receivers log every snap on offense. shyt you say makes zero sense.
here's some math for you tho, I always got some math
22. thats amount of players on field every snap.
53. thats amount of players on active roster
155 million. thats cap for 2016
13. thats number of qbs who are getting on average 19m or more a year for 2006
0. number of teams that won the superbowl with a qb who made 20m a year to date. the guy who came closest is peyton (after restructuring his contract before last year), in his worst ever year being a starting qb
so why is a qb getting like an eighth of total cap if they're not influencing winning it all ? if theyre most important to winning games, how come teams still dont even make offs with some of these guys getting 20m?
the numbers actually say its cheaper and more viable to assemble a great defense and build around them via trading down in draft and signing them for cheap, than to build around a qb who you'll pay an eighth of total cap. now more true than ever. but youre still fascinated by the drum...I mean qbs arm
Oh my god at your first few paragraphs lol.
If every team who's locked in money to a quarterback currently released said player- who are they replacing him with? And Brady is paid under the table so 2014 should be given an asterisk bc he's obviously in that top tier.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
player who plays every snap of the season ?
even if its every snap on offense, plenty of linemen and #1 receivers log every snap on offense. shyt you say makes zero sense.
here's some math for you tho, I always got some math
22. thats amount of players on field every snap.
53. thats amount of players on active roster
155 million. thats cap for 2016
13. thats number of qbs who are getting on average 19m or more a year for 2006
0. number of teams that won the superbowl with a qb who made 20m a year to date. the guy who came closest is peyton (after restructuring his contract before last year), in his worst ever year being a starting qb
so why is a qb getting like an eighth of total cap if they're not influencing winning it all ? if theyre most important to winning games, how come teams still dont even make offs with some of these guys getting 20m?
the numbers actually say its cheaper and more viable to assemble a great defense and build around them via trading down in draft and signing them for cheap, than to build around a qb who you'll pay an eighth of total cap. now more true than ever. but youre still fascinated by the drum...I mean qbs arm
The Niners do need a different QB regardless of pay. Neither Gabbert nor Kaepernick are good enough to win.
duckbutta
eienaar van mans
So the Eagles sign Bradford to a deal...
Sign Daniels to a multi year deal...
And now they blowing draft picks to move up to take a QB...
All the while having to move a lot of chip kelly players...
Did I miss the part where Chip Kelly won a contest to be GM for a day in Philly and decided to fukk them over one last time ?
Sign Daniels to a multi year deal...
And now they blowing draft picks to move up to take a QB...
All the while having to move a lot of chip kelly players...
Did I miss the part where Chip Kelly won a contest to be GM for a day in Philly and decided to fukk them over one last time ?
the eagles are so worried about qb they are paying a guy who wont even be active game days 8th highest salary on the team. a complete shytshow in that front office. you can worry about who will be your qb, while at the same time build up the rest of your roster rather than reach and overspend/trade way too many assets for unproven or mediocre quarterbacks
levitate
I love you, you know.
Thanks, Eagles.
- Browns Fan.
- Browns Fan.
yseJ
Empire strikes back
now you're moving goalposts
classic trip
get confronted with facts aka math and move the goalposts